Scriptural Sanctification - Media Sabda Org

Scriptural Sanctification - Media Sabda Org Scriptural Sanctification - Media Sabda Org

media.sabda.org
from media.sabda.org More from this publisher
21.07.2013 Views

And it is well known that men have, hence, adopted two methods of inquiry into the truth and divinity of Christianity -- the argumentative and experimental methods. In the first we argue from given facts -- facts outside of consciousness -- to a conclusion as to the truth of the theory supposed to be supported by them. From the facts of miracles and prophecy, for example, we argue to the conclusion that the God who wrought the one and inspired the other authorized and approved the utterances of those through whose instrumentality he did these things. The other is the experimental method, already adverted to. In it the testimony of consciousness or experience brings us to a more satisfactory conclusion as to the truth and value of Christianity. The knowledge or proof received in this way comes from experimental tests, while in the other it results from a more or less intricate process of reasoning. We need hardly say that an experiment is an act or series of acts by which we try to discover something unknown, to establish something only partially known, or to test the truth of a theory about which there is doubt. It is an attempt to discover the unknown by the use of the known; to test the truth of a theory that occurs to us or which others claim to have established, and about which there is doubt -- to test it by applying a principle or method suggested by them or known to us or others. Simple experiments test the theory that fire warms us, that food nourishes us, that water quenches our thirst, and that certain medicines heal us. The conviction or experience resulting from such experiment is very decided, and the testimony to others coming from such experience ought to be most decisive and satisfactory -- much more so than that which springs from the result of a process of reasoning. Our Lord prescribed the experimental method of investigation, and enjoined the duty of testifying or witnessing to others of the result of such experiment. To the Jews who questioned his Messiahship and the authority of his utterances, he said: "If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself." Whatever else the Saviour means to teach here, he evidently leaves us to infer that experiment is practicable and valuable in matters of religion. Also that we may test the truth of his doctrines by the experiment here suggested -- the wishing to know and the effort at doing God's will. We are aware of the construction put on these words, which leaves out the latter part of the experiment just stated, and makes our Lord say, "If any man wills or wishes to do God's will," etc., without any reference to his doing it. But we insist that any man who wishes to know or do God's will is ready and is trying to do it, so far as it is already known to him -- shows the sincerity of his desire by such a course. As already suggested, the Jews, to whom he addressed these words, denied or doubted his divinity and his authority to teach them, and virtually charged him with being an impostor. Then "Jesus answered them and said, If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine," etc. He said substantially: "I tell you what I know to be God's truth; test the authority and truthfulness of my utterances by an experiment. I declare to you what I know to be God's will; satisfy yourselves by the test of the experience, which will come to you if you will do his will, as it is revealed by your prophets, or as I make it known to you. The result will be that you shall know as I do, that my doctrine is from God."

Peter's case illustrates the meaning of our Lord and the truth of his declaration. He seems to have been the most candid and teachable, the most earnest and obedient, of his first twelve followers. He seemed ever willing and anxious to know and do God's will, as it was revealed to him by his Master. He promptly followed Jesus at his first call, and on all occasions seems to have been foremost in his devotion to him and his cause. And we find, hence, that he was first to become convinced of his divinity and Messiahship. At least, he was first to openly avow his faith. For when Jesus asked them all, "Whom do ye say that I am?" Peter promptly replied, "Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God." The rejoinder of our Lord is significant and instructive: "Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona; for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven." He knew this not from the testimony of men or that of Christ's miracles merely -- for the others had these as well as he -- but from a direct communication from God to his spiritual consciousness -- an experience of the fact derived from the experiment of doing God's will. Paul's case is another illustration in point. His history and declaration not only prove that he was all along willing and anxious to know God's will, but also that he was trying to do it as he then understood it. He undoubtedly came up to his creed, living "in all good conscience" while persecuting the Church. For, he says, "I verily thought with myself that I ought to do many things contrary to the name of Jesus," unconsciously fulfilling the prophecy of his Lord that, "the time cometh that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service." The language of his heart to God before his arrest on the Damascan road was doubtless that which he then addressed to our Lord: "What wilt thou have me to do?" As a result, Jesus appeared unto him, and, by both an objective and subjective revelation, imparted a knowledge of his Messiahship and of Paul's duty -an experimental as well as a theoretical knowledge of his divinity and power to save. Cornelius, the devout and guileless; the earnest and candid Gentile, who "feared God and wrought righteousness" up to his creed -- did God's will as he understood it -- and who wanted to know it more perfectly, had such fuller revelation made to him by Peter and the Holy Ghost at Caesarea. And Paul teaches, in Romans xii. 1, 2, that consecration to the work of doing God's will and the spiritual transformation that results therefrom will enable us to "prove," or, as Dr. Clarke puts it, "have practical proof and experimental knowledge of the will of God." It is believed that in this way the truth of nearly or quite all the doctrines of Christianity may be tested; that the man who earnestly and conscientiously improves the light he has, let it be much or little, shall have that light increased until he has "abundance" for all his need. This is in harmony with the general law relating to God's gifts, so often stated by our Lord, and as it is written in nature and runs through the spiritual realm, namely, that improvement conditions increase -- that use insures enlargement: "Unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance." It is believed that in this way the sincere atheist may "feel after" and surely "find" our God, and that the honest skeptic and Jew may come to believe in our Bible and the Messiah of the New Testament. And it is confidently claimed that the troubled penitent may in this way find promised pardon, and the renewed soul be lifted to the heights where perpetual sunshine and perennial peace will be his heritage. In this way one can by experiment test the truth of these doctrines, from the basal one of God's existence to the crowning one of the believer's privilege to be thoroughly saved from sin and completely filled with the Spirit of love and power.

Peter's case illustrates the meaning of our Lord and the truth of his declaration. He seems to have<br />

been the most candid and teachable, the most earnest and obedient, of his first twelve followers. He<br />

seemed ever willing and anxious to know and do God's will, as it was revealed to him by his Master.<br />

He promptly followed Jesus at his first call, and on all occasions seems to have been foremost in his<br />

devotion to him and his cause. And we find, hence, that he was first to become convinced of his<br />

divinity and Messiahship. At least, he was first to openly avow his faith. For when Jesus asked them<br />

all, "Whom do ye say that I am?" Peter promptly replied, "Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living<br />

God." The rejoinder of our Lord is significant and instructive: "Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona; for<br />

flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven." He knew this not<br />

from the testimony of men or that of Christ's miracles merely -- for the others had these as well as<br />

he -- but from a direct communication from God to his spiritual consciousness -- an experience of<br />

the fact derived from the experiment of doing God's will.<br />

Paul's case is another illustration in point. His history and declaration not only prove that he was<br />

all along willing and anxious to know God's will, but also that he was trying to do it as he then<br />

understood it. He undoubtedly came up to his creed, living "in all good conscience" while<br />

persecuting the Church. For, he says, "I verily thought with myself that I ought to do many things<br />

contrary to the name of Jesus," unconsciously fulfilling the prophecy of his Lord that, "the time<br />

cometh that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service." The language of his heart<br />

to God before his arrest on the Damascan road was doubtless that which he then addressed to our<br />

Lord: "What wilt thou have me to do?" As a result, Jesus appeared unto him, and, by both an<br />

objective and subjective revelation, imparted a knowledge of his Messiahship and of Paul's duty -an<br />

experimental as well as a theoretical knowledge of his divinity and power to save.<br />

Cornelius, the devout and guileless; the earnest and candid Gentile, who "feared God and wrought<br />

righteousness" up to his creed -- did God's will as he understood it -- and who wanted to know it<br />

more perfectly, had such fuller revelation made to him by Peter and the Holy Ghost at Caesarea. And<br />

Paul teaches, in Romans xii. 1, 2, that consecration to the work of doing God's will and the spiritual<br />

transformation that results therefrom will enable us to "prove," or, as Dr. Clarke puts it, "have<br />

practical proof and experimental knowledge of the will of God."<br />

It is believed that in this way the truth of nearly or quite all the doctrines of Christianity may be<br />

tested; that the man who earnestly and conscientiously improves the light he has, let it be much or<br />

little, shall have that light increased until he has "abundance" for all his need. This is in harmony<br />

with the general law relating to God's gifts, so often stated by our Lord, and as it is written in nature<br />

and runs through the spiritual realm, namely, that improvement conditions increase -- that use insures<br />

enlargement: "Unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance."<br />

It is believed that in this way the sincere atheist may "feel after" and surely "find" our God, and<br />

that the honest skeptic and Jew may come to believe in our Bible and the Messiah of the New<br />

Testament. And it is confidently claimed that the troubled penitent may in this way find promised<br />

pardon, and the renewed soul be lifted to the heights where perpetual sunshine and perennial peace<br />

will be his heritage. In this way one can by experiment test the truth of these doctrines, from the<br />

basal one of God's existence to the crowning one of the believer's privilege to be thoroughly saved<br />

from sin and completely filled with the Spirit of love and power.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!