21.07.2013 Views

Godbey's Commentary - Acts - Romans - Enter His Rest

Godbey's Commentary - Acts - Romans - Enter His Rest

Godbey's Commentary - Acts - Romans - Enter His Rest

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

13. “Then was that which is good made death to me? It could not be so; but sin, that it may<br />

appear sin, was working out death to me through that which is good, in order that sin may appear<br />

exceedingly sinful through the commandment.” Here he describes inbred sin, the soul-poison born<br />

in him, interpenetrating his organism with the virus of depravity and spontaneously working out<br />

death in him as indicated by the middle voice of the verb, thus exhibiting sin in its real horrific<br />

turpitude, malignity and deformity, awfully intensified by the incoming of the law, like a rattlesnake<br />

enraged when disturbed in his lair by an effort to kill him.<br />

14. “But we know that the law is spiritual, but I am carnal, having been sold under sin.” The law<br />

is the very splendor radiating from the throne of God and revealing sin in its horrific deformity.<br />

Hence the law is perfectly pure and holy, and, of course, spiritual, i.e., consentaneous with the Holy<br />

Spirit. We have here carnal “I” and spiritual “I” used contrastively ever and anon. We must not<br />

identify them, for the one represents the old and the other the new man, different as sin is from<br />

holiness, and Satan from God. “Having been sold under sin,” an allusion to the Fall, when father<br />

Adam sold us all out for a mess of apples. The Greek is the perfect tense, as I here translate,<br />

involving the whole human race in original sin.<br />

15. “For that which I do I know not; for I do that which I do not wish, but I do that which I hate.<br />

16. “But if I do that which I do not wish, I consent to the law that it is good: now it is no longer<br />

I that do this, but sin that dwelleth in me.” You recognize the error in E.V., and see how Paul<br />

certifies that he commits neither known nor willing sin. Can you apply this statement to a sinner?<br />

I know not. The normal character of a sinner is to commit known and willing sin. You see positively<br />

that this is not only a justified man, but he is living in a very high state of justification, which may<br />

be said of few, i.e., that our people in the churches who claim justification could truthfully say that<br />

they commit neither known nor willing sin! Let those Christians who apply this chapter to the sinner<br />

make the application to themselves, and see whether they are living on a plane superior to Paul at<br />

this time in his experience when he certifies twice over that he commits neither known nor willing<br />

sin. This is truly the Bible standard of justification. Paul was a man of gigantic mentality and intense<br />

moral and spiritual acumen. Hence he thinks, speaks and acts in the superlative degree. In verse 15<br />

he positively certifies that he commits neither known or willing sin. In verse 17 most unequivocally<br />

abnegates all personal identity with the sin-trouble in which he is involved.<br />

17. “It is no longer I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.” Enoikousa is from en, “in,” and<br />

oikos, “a house.” Hence it means the housed-up sin, i.e., the old sin born in him, and still to his<br />

sorrow living in him, though under his bitter protest. Hence you see the source of all the trouble.<br />

Despite his will and intelligence to the contrary, this old enemy still occupies the citadel in the deep<br />

interior of his heart, never having been dislodged in his miraculous conversion, though so stunned<br />

and paralyzed that Paul thought he was gone, and went to preaching heroically in Damascus. Soon<br />

the enemy stirs so discernibly that recognition is inevitable. Paul is too intense and thorough-going<br />

to wink at the Stygian monster and enter into a compromise. He calls to witness heaven, earth and<br />

hell, that this vexatious problem must reach a final solution. He quits the ministry and goes away to<br />

the Arabian desert to settle the matter with God. He is determined to strike bottom rock before he<br />

leaves the lonely wilderness. Hence he keeps company with the wild beasts three years, but he settles<br />

the matter for time and eternity, coming back to Damascus a cyclone of fire. So he moved a flaming

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!