21.07.2013 Views

Christian Theology - Media Sabda Org

Christian Theology - Media Sabda Org

Christian Theology - Media Sabda Org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to God and man. It is, however, in every case, the argument either of a<br />

shallow mind, or of a vain and corrupted heart.<br />

Simplicity reigned in primitive times; natural ornaments alone were<br />

then in use. Trade and commerce brought in luxuries; and luxury brought<br />

pride, and all the excessive nonsense of dress. No female head ever looks<br />

so well as when adorned with its own hair alone. This is the ornament<br />

appointed by God. To cut it off, or to cover it, is an unnatural practice;<br />

and to exchange the hair which God has given for hair of some other<br />

colour, is an insult to the Creator. How the delicacy of the female<br />

character can stoop to the use of false hair, and especially when it is<br />

considered that the chief part of this kind of hair was once the natural<br />

property of some ruffian soldier who fell in battle by many a ghastly<br />

wound, is more than I can possibly comprehend.<br />

It will rarely be found that women who are fond of dress, and<br />

extravagant in it, have any subjection to their husbands but what comes<br />

from mere necessity. Indeed, their dress, which they intend as an<br />

attractive to the eyes of others, is a sufficient proof that they have neither<br />

love nor respect for their own husbands. Let them who are concerned<br />

refute the charge.<br />

Should not the garments of all those who minister in holy things still<br />

be emblematical of the things in which they minister? Should they not be<br />

for glory and beauty, expressive of the dignity of the gospel ministry, and<br />

that beauty of holiness without which none can see the Lord? As the high<br />

priests' vestments, under the law, were emblematical of what was to<br />

come, should not the vestments of the ministers of the gospel bear some<br />

resemblance of what is come? Is then the dismal black, now worn by<br />

almost all kinds of priests and ministers, for glory and for beauty? Is it<br />

emblematical of any thing that is good, glorious, or excellent? How<br />

unbecoming the glad tidings announced by <strong>Christian</strong> ministers, is a<br />

colour emblematical of nothing but mourning and wo, sin, desolation, and<br />

death! How inconsistent the habit and office of these men! Should it be<br />

said, "These are only shadows, and are useless because the substance is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!