21.07.2013 Views

Christian Theology - Media Sabda Org

Christian Theology - Media Sabda Org

Christian Theology - Media Sabda Org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Christ will never accommodate his morality to the times, nor to the<br />

inclinations of men.<br />

Every thing that our blessed Lord did he performed either as our<br />

pattern or as our sacrifice.<br />

The incarnation of Christ might have been supposed sufficient to<br />

answer all the purposes of reconciling men to God. Could it be supposed<br />

that the good and benevolent God would look on those with indifference<br />

who were represented by so august a person; one who shared their nature,<br />

who assumed it for the very purpose of recommending them to God, and<br />

who, while he felt the sympathies and charities of humanity, was equally<br />

concerned for the honour and justice of God; and who, from the<br />

perfection of his nature, could feel no partialities, nor maintain nor<br />

advocate the interests of one against the honour of the other! I believe the<br />

reason of man could not have gone farther than this; and had revelation<br />

stopped here, reason would have thought that the incarnation was<br />

sufficient, and that even divine Justice could not have withheld any<br />

favour from such an Intercessor. Even this would have appeared a noble<br />

expedient, worthy of the benevolence of God; and a sufficient reason why<br />

he should receive into his favour the beings who were, by this<br />

incarnation, united to Him who from eternity lay in the Father's bosom,<br />

and in whom he ever delighted. But God's "ways are not as our ways, nor<br />

his thoughts as our thoughts." Had man never sinned, and was only to be<br />

recommended to the divine notice, in order to receive favours, or even to<br />

obtain eternal life, this might have been sufficient; but, when he had<br />

sinned, and become a rebel and traitor against his Maker and Sovereign,<br />

the case was widely different. Atonement for the offence was<br />

indispensably requisite; in default of which the penalty, fully known to<br />

him previously to the offence, must be exacted: "In the day thou eatest<br />

thereof thou shalt surely die;" "for the soul that sinneth it shall die." On<br />

this account the incarnation alone could not be sufficient, nor did it take<br />

place in reference to this, but in reference to his bearing the penalty due<br />

to man for his transgression; for without being incarnated he could not<br />

have suffered nor died.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!