A Short History Of The Methodists... - Media Sabda Org

A Short History Of The Methodists... - Media Sabda Org A Short History Of The Methodists... - Media Sabda Org

media.sabda.org
from media.sabda.org More from this publisher
21.07.2013 Views

1780.-- On the 24th day of April, the eighth conference met in Baltimore, where the northern preachers only attended; for the Virginia preachers had a conference appointed in that state. The proceedings of both must be considered together, as it respects the general work. At the conference which was held in Baltimore, and that which was held in Virginia, there were three new circuits taken in: one in Delaware state called Sussex, and one on the eastern shore of Maryland, called Dorset; and one in North Carolina, called Yadkin. Some of the old circuits were left out of the minutes, and we had only twenty circuits this year, which was the same number that we had the year preceding. We had thirty-six preachers to travel in the above number of circuits. They admitted fourteen young preachers on trial. At this conference it was concluded on, 1st, for all the preachers to change circuits at the end of six months. 2d, That all the assistants should see to the settling of all our meeting houses by trustees; and for regular deeds to be taken for the houses. 3d, That all the preachers should take a written license from the conference, certifying that they were either assistants or helpers in connection with the Methodists, and that these certificates should be signed by Mr. Asbury in behalf of the conference. It was also concluded on, that every local preacher and exhorter should have a license every quarter (if required,) to speak in public, and that none of them should attempt to speak in public without such license. They also made a rule for all our preachers to rise at four o'clock in the morning, or at farthest at five o'clock. They also agreed for the first time to allow the wives of our traveling preachers as much money for each quarter (if they needed it) as was allowed to the preachers. They also advised for our quarterly meetings in future to be held on Saturdays and Sundays, where it was convenient. Before this plan was adopted, the quarterly meetings were generally held on the week days. They also concluded to have a fast day in each circuit on the Friday after each quarterly meeting. The conference disapproved of the practice of distilling spirits out of grain, and they agreed to disown our friends who would not renounce the practice. They concluded that the preachers should meet the black people in class; and appoint white men to lead them, and not let them stay late at meeting, nor allow them to meet by themselves. The conference took under consideration the subject of slavery, and required all the traveling preachers who belonged to the Baltimore conference to promise that if they held slaves they would set them free. They went farther, and said, that they believed that keeping of slaves was contrary to the laws of God, of man, and of nature, and that it was hurtful to society, and contrary to the dictates

of conscience, and pure religion. They then say," We pass our disapprobation on all our friends who keep slaves." It is evident that the preachers in this case went too far in their censures; and their language in their resolves was calculated to irritate the minds of our people, and by no means calculated to convince them of their errors. The whole of the conference that met in Baltimore agreed in disapprobating the conduct of the preachers in Virginia, in respect to their ordination, and their administering the ordinances, and concluded that they did not look upon the Virginia preachers as Methodists in connection with Mr. Wesley, and that conference; neither could they consider them as such unless they came back to their former standing, and to their elder brethren. The Baltimore conference then appointed brother Asbury, brother William Waters, and brother Freeborn Garrettson to attend the conference in Virginia, and to inform the preachers in that conference of what had been determined on in the Baltimore conference; and to let them know withal that the only condition upon which they could be united was, that they (the Virginia preachers) should suspend the administration of the ordinances for one year; and then all the preachers to meet together at the next annual conference to be held in Baltimore. In the spring of the year, some time in April, Mr. Asbury left his quiet retreat in Delaware state, where he had been lying by, (and for the most part of the time at Thomas White's) for two years and one month; and then met with the preachers in conference at Baltimore, as has been already mentioned. He then visited his brethren in Virginia, and attended the conference at the Manakin town, which began on the 8th day of May, 1780. At that time Mr. Asbury had to exert all his powers, and to use all possible prudence in order to bring about a settled peace and union among all the preachers. The most influential preachers in that separation in favor of the ordinances, were Philip Gatch, John Dickins, and James O 'Kelly. These men were much respected for their usefulness in the ministry. After much contention, and distress, Mr. Asbury proposed to the southern preachers a plan for union which was this; that they should not administer the ordinances for a twelve-month, and that they should all then meet together in conference at Baltimore. And in the course of the year they would write to Mr. Wesley in England, and lay their situation before him and get his advice. The plan took with the Virginia preachers, and they consented to the proposal. By this prudent step a division was prevented, and a blessed union restored. The preachers pretty generally went from that conference to their circuits, with thankful hearts that the breach was healed, and union restored to the connection. A few of the preachers were so fond of their new self-made ordination, that it was with some reluctance that they gave it up, and submitted to the proposed plan for union. Mr. Asbury then traveled through the different circuits in the south parts of Virginia, and from thence into North Carolina, through Roanoak, Tar River, and New Hope circuits; and by his being often with the preachers, and among the people in the south, the divisive spirit died away; and the

of conscience, and pure religion. <strong>The</strong>y then say," We pass our disapprobation on all our friends who<br />

keep slaves."<br />

It is evident that the preachers in this case went too far in their censures; and their language in<br />

their resolves was calculated to irritate the minds of our people, and by no means calculated to<br />

convince them of their errors.<br />

<strong>The</strong> whole of the conference that met in Baltimore agreed in disapprobating the conduct of the<br />

preachers in Virginia, in respect to their ordination, and their administering the ordinances, and<br />

concluded that they did not look upon the Virginia preachers as <strong>Methodists</strong> in connection with Mr.<br />

Wesley, and that conference; neither could they consider them as such unless they came back to their<br />

former standing, and to their elder brethren.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Baltimore conference then appointed brother Asbury, brother William Waters, and brother<br />

Freeborn Garrettson to attend the conference in Virginia, and to inform the preachers in that<br />

conference of what had been determined on in the Baltimore conference; and to let them know withal<br />

that the only condition upon which they could be united was, that they (the Virginia preachers)<br />

should suspend the administration of the ordinances for one year; and then all the preachers to meet<br />

together at the next annual conference to be held in Baltimore.<br />

In the spring of the year, some time in April, Mr. Asbury left his quiet retreat in Delaware state,<br />

where he had been lying by, (and for the most part of the time at Thomas White's) for two years and<br />

one month; and then met with the preachers in conference at Baltimore, as has been already<br />

mentioned. He then visited his brethren in Virginia, and attended the conference at the Manakin<br />

town, which began on the 8th day of May, 1780. At that time Mr. Asbury had to exert all his powers,<br />

and to use all possible prudence in order to bring about a settled peace and union among all the<br />

preachers. <strong>The</strong> most influential preachers in that separation in favor of the ordinances, were Philip<br />

Gatch, John Dickins, and James O 'Kelly. <strong>The</strong>se men were much respected for their usefulness in<br />

the ministry.<br />

After much contention, and distress, Mr. Asbury proposed to the southern preachers a plan for<br />

union which was this; that they should not administer the ordinances for a twelve-month, and that<br />

they should all then meet together in conference at Baltimore. And in the course of the year they<br />

would write to Mr. Wesley in England, and lay their situation before him and get his advice. <strong>The</strong><br />

plan took with the Virginia preachers, and they consented to the proposal. By this prudent step a<br />

division was prevented, and a blessed union restored. <strong>The</strong> preachers pretty generally went from that<br />

conference to their circuits, with thankful hearts that the breach was healed, and union restored to<br />

the connection.<br />

A few of the preachers were so fond of their new self-made ordination, that it was with some<br />

reluctance that they gave it up, and submitted to the proposed plan for union.<br />

Mr. Asbury then traveled through the different circuits in the south parts of Virginia, and from<br />

thence into North Carolina, through Roanoak, Tar River, and New Hope circuits; and by his being<br />

often with the preachers, and among the people in the south, the divisive spirit died away; and the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!