A Short History Of The Methodists... - Media Sabda Org
A Short History Of The Methodists... - Media Sabda Org
A Short History Of The Methodists... - Media Sabda Org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
He made note of the many changes that had taken place in the town since he was there thirteen<br />
years before, when he had preached the first Methodist sermon in an old vacant house in the outer<br />
edge of the city. <strong>The</strong>re were now two congregations with houses to worship in and comfortable<br />
homes open for the traveling preachers. <strong>The</strong> Conference began and ended in great peace. Mr. Lee<br />
then passed on into Georgia, where he spent twenty-seven days and was much pleased with the new<br />
country. "I have seldom seen a new country I liked as well as Georgia." Most of the people where<br />
he visited were from Virginia. He traveled through several counties, going as far south as the<br />
boundary line between Georgia and Florida. From there he turned north, to be at the Conference at<br />
Salem, Va., April 9. He preached at this Conference with much power, and was followed oftentimes<br />
by Bishop Asbury in exhortation. He was from this time on constantly with the bishop, holding<br />
Conferences, acting sometimes as secretary to the Conference, preaching and doing all the work of<br />
a bishop except to ordain preachers, until the meeting of the General Conference, in Baltimore, on<br />
May 6, 1800. He went to the Conference with high hopes and a holy desire for the office of bishop.<br />
This writer thinks that if there ever was a man who had a right to expect to be elected to this high<br />
office, it was Jesse Lee.<br />
When Bishop Asbury called him, in 1797, to become his traveling companion and assistant, he<br />
also suggested a way by which the Conferences might elect three men to the office of bishop, one<br />
of whom was Mr. Lee. He appointed him, and two or three Conferences did the same, as Mr.<br />
Asbury's assistant and companion; and for almost three years he filled the place of a bishop.<br />
Furthermore, he was a much-talked of man for the place -- he was a native of Virginia, perhaps the<br />
best-known man in the connection, one of the best preachers, and a man of splendid executive<br />
ability. He was by constitution and temperament specially fitted for the work of a pioneer bishop.<br />
<strong>The</strong> other man mentioned for the place was Richard Whatcoat, who had been in America only<br />
sixteen years.<br />
<strong>The</strong> day of election arrived, and it seems that, from some cause or other, there was much<br />
excitement. <strong>The</strong> first ballot showed a scattering vote, the second was a tie between Richard Whatcoat<br />
and Jesse Lee, while on the third ballot Richard Whatcoat was elected by a majority of four. From<br />
the information we gather concerning what had gone on for several years and at this Conference, we<br />
are constrained to say that this disappointment crushed Mr. Lee, and that he never again attained to<br />
the heights which he had reached before his defeat. We do not desire to be understood as saying that<br />
the days of his usefulness were over, for that was not the case; but the fiery zeal of this once flaming<br />
evangel of the gospel began to smolder. He can tell the story in his journal, as follows:<br />
May 13th. <strong>The</strong>re was some uneasiness in the mind of some of the preachers respecting a report<br />
which had been circulated, by some person or persons, in order to prevent my election to the bishop's<br />
office. <strong>The</strong> report was this: That Mr. Asbury had said that Brother Lee had imposed himself on him<br />
and on the connection, for eighteen months past, and he would have gotten rid of him long ago if he<br />
could. <strong>The</strong>y came to me about it, and I told them I did not believe Mr. Asbury said it; but if he had<br />
reported it, I could prove to the reverse. So I went to Mr. Asbury about it. He denied it, and said he<br />
wished me to consent to travel at large in the future, and to attend the Conference. I told him I<br />
despised the idea of doing anything out of resentment, and that I had two things in view respecting<br />
my manner of traveling -- one was the peace and happiness of my own mind, and the other was the<br />
good of the Church and Methodism at large -- and that I had but little expectation of complying with