A Presentation of Perfection - Media Sabda Org

A Presentation of Perfection - Media Sabda Org A Presentation of Perfection - Media Sabda Org

media.sabda.org
from media.sabda.org More from this publisher
21.07.2013 Views

silent seal of the indwelling Spirit, is sometimes looked for without any express warrant of [15] Scripture," stated Peters. Pope believed you could know that you were sanctified by the witness of the Spirit but that some people expected too much out of the doctrine of assurance. In other words, Pope did not believe a person should necessarily display some kind of a physical demonstration (i.e., shouting) to validate receiving the work of entire sanctification. Thomas Ralston Thomas Ralston upheld a Wesleyan position of Christian Perfection. He was of the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, and was very influential both as a scholar and a preacher. His work Elements of Divinity was a required textbook for many years for those wanting to be ordained in the Methodist Church, South. There were a couple of variations from Wesley's view in Ralston's presentation of entire sanctification. Ralston believed that Christian Perfection was simply regeneration grown to maturity. Writing of Ralston's views, Greathouse stated: While insisting that regeneration and entire sanctification are the same in nature and differ only in degree, Ralston emphasizes that Christian Perfection involves entire consecration to God and a complete cleansing of the soul from all unrighteousness. [16] Also, Ralston did not hold entirely to the Wesleyan position of a person being able to know that his soul was separated from sin, enabling him to live his life in perfect love. Ralston stated the following: It matters but little whether this eminent state of holiness is gained by a bold, energetic, and determined exercise of faith and prayer, or by a more gradual process whether it is instantaneous or gradual, or both the one and the other. The great matter is, with each and all of us, that we lose no time, but arise at once, and "press toward the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus." [17] Randolph Foster By the middle of the nineteenth century many views were in circulation about the meaning of Christian Perfection. Even in the Methodist Church some were beginning to question the correctness of the Wesleyan position on holiness. One such doctrine circulating was that sanctification was synonymous with regeneration. Foster came on the religious scene as a staunch supporter of the Wesleyan view of Christian Perfection. He was concerned about the deviation from the Wesleyan doctrine and wrote a book in 1851 to present his views about the matter. The book was called The Nature and Blessedness of Christian Purity. It was received well and printed in a second edition a few years later. In his book Foster pointed out that the Wesleyan view of Holiness does not support the idea that being saved and entirely sanctified are the same experience. He made this clear when he said,

But it may be asked with earnestness, "Is not the work of God perfect in regeneration?" and we answer, it is a perfect regeneration. But a perfect regeneration is not a perfect sanctification, no more than perfect penitence is regeneration. The soul is perfectly born anew, but it is not perfectly made holy. [18] Foster in his writings was also concerned about what he considered negative aspects of Palmer's "altar theology." She encouraged seekers to come to the altar to literally present their bodies a living sacrifice to God. Foster, among others, felt that sometimes this methodology caused people to experience sanctification by mental assent only. He believed there was more to becoming entirely sanctified than just believing and the work would be done. Foster says, Those who teach this new doctrine tend to substitute 'mere belief' for 'confiding trust.' For Wesley, sanctifying faith, like justifying faith, is more than intellectual assent; it is the warm trust of the heart. [19] Miner Raymond There was still an unrest in Methodism over holiness when Raymond wrote his work. Greathouse has written, During the holiness controversy in American Methodism, Miner Raymond (1811-97), professor of systematic theology at Darrett Biblical Institute, produced his three-volume Systematic Theology. Published in 1877, it was placed in the Methodist Episcopal Course of Study in 1880, where it remained until 1908. [20] Raymond, like Foster, was a staunch supporter of a Wesleyan view of Christian Perfection. He did point out a couple of things to which Methodism should be aware. First, no person should build his faith on another person's experience. He said that God works individually with us in our experiencing sanctification. Secondly, he did admit that it was difficult to define Christian Perfection. However, he wholeheartedly believed in the experience. He said, The propriety of affirming the doctrine of Christian Perfection cannot be denied. The Scriptures recognize a state of grace which they speak of as a state of maturity, and they call that grace perfect love. They further assure that this is a state of grace which [21] may be sought, obtained, and enjoyed. Christian perfection, therefore, despite the difficulty of definition, includes at least these two ideas: maturity and perfect love. Explore those concepts and the breadth of the doctrine is evident. [22] John Miley John Miley was a professor of systematic theology at Drew Theological Seminary. His two-volume Systematic Theology was published in 1894 and was reprinted as recently as 1989. The conclusions he arrived at had a far-reaching effect in the religious world, especially in Methodism.

silent seal <strong>of</strong> the indwelling Spirit, is sometimes looked for without any express warrant <strong>of</strong><br />

[15]<br />

Scripture," stated Peters. Pope believed you could know that you were sanctified by the witness<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Spirit but that some people expected too much out <strong>of</strong> the doctrine <strong>of</strong> assurance. In other words,<br />

Pope did not believe a person should necessarily display some kind <strong>of</strong> a physical demonstration (i.e.,<br />

shouting) to validate receiving the work <strong>of</strong> entire sanctification.<br />

Thomas Ralston<br />

Thomas Ralston upheld a Wesleyan position <strong>of</strong> Christian <strong>Perfection</strong>. He was <strong>of</strong> the Methodist<br />

Episcopal Church, South, and was very influential both as a scholar and a preacher. His work<br />

Elements <strong>of</strong> Divinity was a required textbook for many years for those wanting to be ordained in the<br />

Methodist Church, South.<br />

There were a couple <strong>of</strong> variations from Wesley's view in Ralston's presentation <strong>of</strong> entire<br />

sanctification. Ralston believed that Christian <strong>Perfection</strong> was simply regeneration grown to maturity.<br />

Writing <strong>of</strong> Ralston's views, Greathouse stated:<br />

While insisting that regeneration and entire sanctification are the same in nature and<br />

differ only in degree, Ralston emphasizes that Christian <strong>Perfection</strong> involves entire<br />

consecration to God and a complete cleansing <strong>of</strong> the soul from all unrighteousness.<br />

[16]<br />

Also, Ralston did not hold entirely to the Wesleyan position <strong>of</strong> a person being able to know that<br />

his soul was separated from sin, enabling him to live his life in perfect love. Ralston stated the<br />

following:<br />

It matters but little whether this eminent state <strong>of</strong> holiness is gained by a bold,<br />

energetic, and determined exercise <strong>of</strong> faith and prayer, or by a more gradual process<br />

whether it is instantaneous or gradual, or both the one and the other. The great matter<br />

is, with each and all <strong>of</strong> us, that we lose no time, but arise at once, and "press toward<br />

the mark for the prize <strong>of</strong> the high calling <strong>of</strong> God in Christ Jesus." [17]<br />

Randolph Foster<br />

By the middle <strong>of</strong> the nineteenth century many views were in circulation about the meaning <strong>of</strong><br />

Christian <strong>Perfection</strong>. Even in the Methodist Church some were beginning to question the correctness<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Wesleyan position on holiness. One such doctrine circulating was that sanctification was<br />

synonymous with regeneration.<br />

Foster came on the religious scene as a staunch supporter <strong>of</strong> the Wesleyan view <strong>of</strong> Christian<br />

<strong>Perfection</strong>. He was concerned about the deviation from the Wesleyan doctrine and wrote a book in<br />

1851 to present his views about the matter. The book was called The Nature and Blessedness <strong>of</strong><br />

Christian Purity. It was received well and printed in a second edition a few years later.<br />

In his book Foster pointed out that the Wesleyan view <strong>of</strong> Holiness does not support the idea that<br />

being saved and entirely sanctified are the same experience. He made this clear when he said,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!