21.07.2013 Views

A Presentation of Perfection - Media Sabda Org

A Presentation of Perfection - Media Sabda Org

A Presentation of Perfection - Media Sabda Org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Like John Wesley, Clarke was a consistent promoter <strong>of</strong> the experience <strong>of</strong> holiness. However; there<br />

are at least three ways in which Clarke approached the doctrine <strong>of</strong> holiness differently from Wesley<br />

First, Clarke thought there should have been more emphasis put on the fact that sanctification was<br />

wrought in the heart instantaneously. "In fact, the instantaneous is the only method he recognizes as<br />

scriptural. Unlike Wesley and Fletcher he rules out altogether the idea <strong>of</strong> gradual attainment," [12]<br />

notes Peters. Secondly, Clarke dogmatically proclaimed the experience <strong>of</strong> holiness was obtainable<br />

in this life on earth. Wesley wanted to find out if others had received the blessing before he preached<br />

about it, whereas Clarke said he would preach about it and live it even if no one else ever claimed<br />

the experience <strong>of</strong> holiness. Thirdly, Clarke left a written emphatic testimony to his personal holiness<br />

experience, whereas Wesley did not. Other than these items, Clarke was faithful to expound the<br />

doctrine <strong>of</strong> holiness as proclaimed by Wesley and, ultimately, by Scripture.<br />

Richard Watson<br />

Watson, a few years younger than Clarke, is also remembered as an influential early Methodist<br />

theologian. This scholar is known as the first person to systematize the theology <strong>of</strong> Methodism. His<br />

best known work is Theological Institutes. At least two things are noteworthy about Watson and his<br />

teaching <strong>of</strong> sanctification. In the first place, he held a high view <strong>of</strong> the work that takes place in<br />

regeneration. Watson emphasized that one must really be saved before he can receive the second<br />

work <strong>of</strong> grace. Secondly, he <strong>of</strong>ten spoke <strong>of</strong> a person "gradually" experiencing sanctification. Peters<br />

has said,<br />

Moreover, while Clarke was tending to move to the left <strong>of</strong> the standard set by Wesley<br />

and Fletcher (by his emphasis on the instantaneous), Watson was moving to the right<br />

(by his emphasis on the gradual). [13]<br />

William Pope<br />

William Pope is best known for his three-volume work entitled Compendium <strong>of</strong> Christian<br />

Theology published in 1875. In this work Pope quotes extensively from Wesley's Plain Account <strong>of</strong><br />

Christian <strong>Perfection</strong>. Later Pope wrote another book, Higher Catechism <strong>of</strong> Theology. In this volume<br />

he gave more <strong>of</strong> his own view about Christian <strong>Perfection</strong> and summarizes and simplifies the<br />

Compendium <strong>of</strong> Christian Theology. William Greathouse has pointed out:<br />

What Pope wishes to make most clear about the Wesleyan view is given under the<br />

heading "cardinal teaching." And this is that perfection is solely the Spirit's work in<br />

the believer; but implies his most strenuous cooperation: as to the former, it is<br />

received merely by faith and hence may be given instantaneously, in a moment; as<br />

to the latter, this is a gradual work, both preceding and following that instant. [14]<br />

It is evident that Pope believed in both the instantaneous and gradual aspects <strong>of</strong> Christian<br />

<strong>Perfection</strong>.<br />

There was one point upon which Pope is controversial among holiness theologians. "A distinct<br />

assurance, connected with the moment <strong>of</strong> final deliverance from sin, and as it were apart from the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!