21.07.2013 Views

History of the M.E. Church, Vol. IV - Media Sabda Org

History of the M.E. Church, Vol. IV - Media Sabda Org

History of the M.E. Church, Vol. IV - Media Sabda Org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1 General Conference Journal,, vol.1, p.71.<br />

2 Dr. Lee's, Life <strong>of</strong> Lee, p.429.<br />

3 Elliott's Life <strong>of</strong> Bishop Roberts, p.159.<br />

4 Bangs' "<strong>History</strong>," <strong>Vol</strong>. ii, p.281.<br />

5 See vol. iii, p. 41.<br />

ENDNOTES<br />

6 Coke's Letter to <strong>the</strong> General Conference <strong>of</strong> 1808, in Bangs, vol. ii, p.207. There is an important<br />

passage in this letter which fur<strong>the</strong>r decides <strong>the</strong> question, (treated in a long note on page 37 <strong>of</strong> my<br />

third volume,) whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re was a session <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> General Conference between 1784 and 1792. Coke<br />

says, January 29, 1808, "There are few <strong>of</strong> you who can possibly recollect anything <strong>of</strong> what I am next<br />

going to add. Many <strong>of</strong> you were <strong>the</strong>n only little children. We had at that time [1791] no regular<br />

General Conference. One only had been held in <strong>the</strong> year 1784. I had indeed, with great labor and<br />

fatigue, a few months before I wrote this letter to Bishop White, prevailed on James O'Kelly to<br />

submit to <strong>the</strong> decision <strong>of</strong> a General Conference. This Conference was to be held in about a year and<br />

a half after my departure from <strong>the</strong> States. And at this Conference, held, I think, <strong>the</strong> latter end <strong>of</strong> 1792,<br />

I proposed and obtained that great blessing to <strong>the</strong> American connection, a permanency for General<br />

Conferences, which were to be held at stated times. Previously to <strong>the</strong> holding <strong>of</strong> this Conference<br />

(except <strong>the</strong> general one held in 1784) <strong>the</strong>re were only small district meetings, excepting <strong>the</strong> council<br />

which was held at Cokesbury College ei<strong>the</strong>r in 1791 or 1792." This, even without <strong>the</strong> decisive<br />

citation I make from Asbury in my former note, sets at rest <strong>the</strong> question.<br />

7 The Italics are his own.<br />

8 Lee's Life <strong>of</strong> Lee, see p.435.<br />

9 Lee's Life <strong>of</strong> Lee, p. 475, note. Bangs (ii, 332) is erroneous in supposing that <strong>the</strong>re is nothing in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Conference records relating to this question from 1792 to 1808. The record <strong>of</strong> 1800 shows that<br />

it was <strong>the</strong>n acted upon.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!