21.07.2013 Views

Apartheid

Apartheid

Apartheid

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

88<br />

only, primarily by Jewish settlers and Israeli military personnel, would criss-cross the<br />

Palestinian cantons. These roads would in practice remain under Israeli sovereignty as well. In<br />

essence, the Israeli-American plan for the Palestinians meant that 200 small prisons would be<br />

turned into four or five larger ones, and Israel would control the land around them, between<br />

them, and the airspace above them. Palestine would not be allowed to border its neighbors,<br />

Jordan and Egypt. All land next to the borders would still be under Israeli control. The<br />

Palestinian people would thus remain under total Israeli military, political and economic<br />

control. Furthermore, as Seth Ackerman reported: ‘[i]n exchange for taking fertile West Bank<br />

lands that happen to contain most of the region’s scarce water aquifers, Israel [at Camp<br />

David] offered to give up a piece of territory in the Negev desert – about one-tenth the size of<br />

the land it would annex – including a former toxic waste dump.’ Nonetheless, the Israeli and<br />

US media somehow managed to produce and successfully spread a depiction of the Barak-<br />

Clinton plan as generous towards Palestinians, and PLO leader Arafat as the one who spoiled<br />

the party by subsequently rejecting the plan. 138<br />

The second major civilian Palestinian uprising, the Second Intifada or ‘Al-Aqsa<br />

Intifada’, erupted on September 28, 2000, and soon turned into a contained civil war,<br />

involving heavy weaponry on the Israeli side, again pitched against mainly stone-throwers but<br />

also a few light firearms, and from 2001 bombs and grenades for suicide attacks on the<br />

Palestinian side. Intense pressure from the US and other Israeli allies have so far kept the<br />

neighboring Arab states from attempting to intervene in the Intifadas as they had done in the<br />

wars of 1948, 1967 and 1973, although a majority of inhabitants of these countries would<br />

probably favor such an intervention, despite the overwhelming military hardware odds<br />

stacked against them.<br />

The promises to the Palestinians incorporated in the spirit of the Oslo accords, that a<br />

Palestinian sovereign state would be established by 1998, that the illegal settlements would<br />

disappear or at least stop expanding, had been postponed repeatedly or broken. The first five<br />

people to be killed in this Intifada, were again Palestinians, but somehow, the world’s<br />

dominant media, led by the pro-Israeli, privately-owned US media, managed to turn this<br />

around as well. Nine weeks later, at least 264 people had been killed in the violence in the<br />

Occupied Territories, all but 29 of them Palestinians (including ‘Israeli Arabs’) or foreign<br />

nationals killed by Israeli armed forces or settlers. 139 The US Secretary of State at the time,<br />

Madeleine Albright, referred to this situation as a ‘siege’ by the stone-throwing Palestinians of<br />

the state of Israel (see Chapter II.9.3). Youths with a Stone Age arsenal were allegedly<br />

besieging one of the five greatest military powers in the world, a diversified, hypermodern<br />

military machine with hundreds of nuclear bombs! In fact, the Israeli army had moved into<br />

nominally Palestinian territory, where almost all of the clashes were taking place. That is a sad<br />

138 See Ackerman, S.: The Myth of the Generous Offer: Distorting the Camp David Negotiations, 2002, for an<br />

excellent treatment of the subject. See also Chomsky: US-Israel-Palestine, 2002; Hass: The Myth of the State<br />

and the Reality of the Annexation, 2003. There is no known parallel to Bantustan policies in Graeco-Roman<br />

Egypt. The obvious reason is that there were no international laws or conventions at that time granting peoples<br />

the right to self-determination or demanding democracy, and consequently no need for such expensive and cruel<br />

hypocrisy. However, there were temples of the ancient Egyptian religion, within which impoverished Egyptian<br />

peasants were sometimes able to find asylum from the Ptolemaic or Roman state’s tax collectors. Led by the<br />

least unprivileged group of Egyptians – the priests – the temples, however, had no other known rights vis à vis<br />

the Graeco-Roman elites, and were thus much further away from true sovereignty than the Bantustans were.<br />

They were also of course even smaller in size, and the apartheid-regime-instated puppets, who were presumably<br />

in charge, had even less freedom than a South African or a Palestinian Bantustan authority did or does. Jews,<br />

similarly, were also granted asylum from tax collectors in the numerous synagogues that existed throughout<br />

Egypt in late ancient times. Fraser: Ptolemaic Alexandria, Volume I, 1972: 283f.<br />

139 N.N.: Israel Uses Excessive Force - Israeli Rights Group, December 6, 2000. Additionally, four foreign<br />

nationals had been killed by Israeli soldiers during this Intifada at this point in time. B’tselem, the Israeli human<br />

rights group, condemned Israel for ‘grave’ human rights violations. The news agency Reuters’ own, unofficial<br />

death toll was slightly higher, with at least 297 people killed, though that included people killed within Israel’s<br />

1967 borders, mainly Israeli Arabs, killed by Jews, which the B’tselem toll did not include.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!