Apartheid

Apartheid Apartheid

media.manila.at
from media.manila.at More from this publisher
21.07.2013 Views

84 made on the curious premise that Africans did not naturally like bread, which was a more sophisticated or ‘Western’ taste. The diet for white detainees was far superior to that of Africans. So color-conscious were the authorities that even the type of sugar and bread supplied to whites and nonwhites differed: white prisoners received white sugar and white bread, while Coloured and Indian prisoners were given brown sugar and brown bread. 125 Apartheid laws started being repealed in the 1980s amid growing international pressure as well as continuous internal unrest and violence. At the same time, however, the apartheid-induced wars in neighboring Angola and Mozambique intensified. Then, suddenly and fully beyond the control and input by southern African players, the Cold War ended in 1989. Henceforth, South Africa’s main perceived usefulness for NATO, as a southern front against the communist-led former Portuguese colonies, evaporated. In 1990, Nelson Mandela was released from prison. In 1991, the remaining racist laws were scrapped. Three years later, Mandela’s political party, the ANC, won the country’s first democratic elections and led the design of South Africa’s new, non-racist Constitution, which has become one of the most liberal and inclusive ones in the world. Yet, formidable problems still plague South Africa. The country remains deeply divided between rich and poor, between white and non-white. Black poverty, rampant crime and high unemployment levels appear to be persistent after-effects of apartheid. For instance, 96 per cent of the share value at the Johannesburg Stock Exchange and 87 per cent of the land was still in white owners’ hands in November 2002, over eight years after ‘liberation’. Hardly any of the Whites responsible for apartheid had been punished or sanctioned for their crimes in any way. At this stage, the white population in the country amounted to only 10.7 per cent of the total population. 126 3. Israel The Israeli occupation of Palestine, even though it is still not generally regarded as a system of apartheid, very closely resembles the white racist practices against the non-Whites of South Africa between 1948 and 1994, with the Israeli government playing the role of the white South African government, the non-Jews corresponding to the non-Whites and the Palestinians corresponding to the Blacks. The South African liberation movement and currently ruling party, the ANC, condemned Israeli apartheid in 2001 (see Conclusions, Chapter III.2, below). The former Israeli prime minister, Ariel Sharon, has admitted practicing apartheid, though not in public. Abdel Rahman, special envoy of the Palestinian president Yasser Arafat, to South Africa, once stated: ‘...The Palestinian people have much in common with South Africans’ anti-apartheid movement...but [they] are still under a colonial apartheid system.’ 127 The immediate historical background to this system is succinctly summarized by 125 Mandela 1995 (1994): 244. This degree of idiocy is unlikely to ever have occurred in other apartheid societies. It remains, however, a mere matter of degree. It is also idiotic to heap privileges on one atheist because he is considered a Jew, and deny them all to another atheist, who grew up around the corner from the first one, because he is considered an Arab. However, as a ‘prize’ for the imbecility of white South African racial classification practices as described here by Mandela, one might say, this form of oppression – apartheid – warrants and deserves being given an Afrikaans name. 126 Commey: South Africa – Land: A Ticking Time Bomb, 2002: 12-16. Some of the white shareholders, as during the reign of political apartheid, were Europeans and Americans. 127 N.N.: Arafat Aide Asks South Africa to Promote Mideast Peace, February 9, 1998. Of course modern Israel was never a colonial power in the traditional sense. Yet, the predominance of European and North American Jews in Israel and its close ties with NATO and with individual NATO member countries have in many ways made it an outpost of a North Atlantic-led global hegemonic system. See Chomsky Fateful Triangle: The United States, Israel and the Palestinians, 2 1999. There are also efforts being made to bring Israel into the European Union. In May 2003, the Israeli foreign minister, Silvan Shalom, confirmed that Israel was in fact pursuing this goal. See N.N.: Radical Deputies Urge EU Membership for Israel, January 30, 2001; N.N.: Israel Considers

Alex and Stephen Shalom: More than half a century ago, the United Nations (which at the time had comparatively few Third World members) recommended the partition of Palestine into Palestinian and Jewish states, and an internationalized Jerusalem, with the Jewish [and most recently immigrated] minority to receive the majority of the land, as well as most of the fertile land. A civil war and then a regional war ensued and when the armistice agreements were signed there was Israel, the Jewish state, but no Palestinian state and no international Jerusalem, both of these being taken over and divided between Israel and Jordan [and the Gaza strip by Egypt]. The occupying Israelis, however, were not content to block the emergence of a Palestinian state; they wanted as well to expel as many Palestinians as possible. This ethnic cleansing – forced expulsions facilitated by acts of terror – drove hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from their ancestral lands, to refugee camps where they lived in squalor, longing to return [and with international law on their side]. In 1967, Israel conquered Jordan’s [and Egypt’s] share of Palestine, creating a new wave of Palestinian refugees, and subjecting many more to ruthless Israeli rule in the occupied territories. 128 There were only 24,000 Jews in Palestine in 1881. At that point in time Arabs made up 95 per cent of the population of Palestine. Although ruled by Turks, Arabic-speaking Palestinians had continuously owned the territory of Palestine for over a millennium. After the birth of the Zionist movement in 1896 (see Chapter II.9.3, below), however, Jewish immigration into the country gathered steam, so that around 60,000 Jews inhabited the country when the British took over the province from the Turks at the end of World War I. Yet, they were still only around ten per cent of the total population. In 1917, Britain issued its ‘Balfour declaration’, in the words of the Guardian newspaper: a “masterpiece of political obfuscation, in which the British foreign secretary, Arthur Balfour, writing to Lord Rothschild of the World Zionist Organisation, promises all things to all men: ‘His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.’” And so, it did not quite promise all things to all men. In particular, the political, social, and economic rights of the indigenous 90 per cent of the population are conspicuously absent. Yet the British had previously promised Arabs political independence if the Arabs would help them topple Ottoman rule, a promise that was broken. The British foreign secretary, Jack Straw, admitted in November 2002 that the British had helped create the Israeli-Palestinian conflict with the Balfour Declaration. But it should not be forgotten that it was also the result of Zionist lobbying, and more generally of western nationalism and racism against Arabs. In the years following the Balfour declaration, another 35,000 Jews arrived, many with a Zionist notion of creating a Jewish national home in Palestine, and clashes between them and the indigenous Palestinians started to erupt. 129 Applying to Join EU, May 20, 2003. See also Löwstedt: Comparing Israeli Oppression with South African Apartheid, 2005, and footnote 415 below on Sharon’s admission to be practicing apartheid. 128 Shalom & Shalom: Turmoil in Palestine: The Basic Context, no date. I will deal with the wider historical ramifications of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in detail in Chapter II.9.3. 129 Abi-Aad & Grenon: Instability and Conflict in the Middle East: People, Petroleum and Security Threats, 1997: 6f; Brown: Israel and the Middle East: Key Events, 2002; N.N.: British Empire Blamed for Modern Conflicts, November 15, 2002 85

84<br />

made on the curious premise that Africans did not naturally like bread,<br />

which was a more sophisticated or ‘Western’ taste. The diet for white<br />

detainees was far superior to that of Africans. So color-conscious were<br />

the authorities that even the type of sugar and bread supplied to whites<br />

and nonwhites differed: white prisoners received white sugar and<br />

white bread, while Coloured and Indian prisoners were given brown<br />

sugar and brown bread. 125<br />

<strong>Apartheid</strong> laws started being repealed in the 1980s amid growing international<br />

pressure as well as continuous internal unrest and violence. At the same time, however, the<br />

apartheid-induced wars in neighboring Angola and Mozambique intensified. Then, suddenly<br />

and fully beyond the control and input by southern African players, the Cold War ended in<br />

1989. Henceforth, South Africa’s main perceived usefulness for NATO, as a southern front<br />

against the communist-led former Portuguese colonies, evaporated. In 1990, Nelson Mandela<br />

was released from prison. In 1991, the remaining racist laws were scrapped. Three years later,<br />

Mandela’s political party, the ANC, won the country’s first democratic elections and led the<br />

design of South Africa’s new, non-racist Constitution, which has become one of the most<br />

liberal and inclusive ones in the world.<br />

Yet, formidable problems still plague South Africa. The country remains deeply<br />

divided between rich and poor, between white and non-white. Black poverty, rampant crime<br />

and high unemployment levels appear to be persistent after-effects of apartheid. For instance,<br />

96 per cent of the share value at the Johannesburg Stock Exchange and 87 per cent of the land<br />

was still in white owners’ hands in November 2002, over eight years after ‘liberation’. Hardly<br />

any of the Whites responsible for apartheid had been punished or sanctioned for their crimes<br />

in any way. At this stage, the white population in the country amounted to only 10.7 per cent<br />

of the total population. 126<br />

3. Israel<br />

The Israeli occupation of Palestine, even though it is still not generally regarded as a<br />

system of apartheid, very closely resembles the white racist practices against the non-Whites<br />

of South Africa between 1948 and 1994, with the Israeli government playing the role of the<br />

white South African government, the non-Jews corresponding to the non-Whites and the<br />

Palestinians corresponding to the Blacks. The South African liberation movement and<br />

currently ruling party, the ANC, condemned Israeli apartheid in 2001 (see Conclusions,<br />

Chapter III.2, below). The former Israeli prime minister, Ariel Sharon, has admitted practicing<br />

apartheid, though not in public. Abdel Rahman, special envoy of the Palestinian president<br />

Yasser Arafat, to South Africa, once stated: ‘...The Palestinian people have much in common<br />

with South Africans’ anti-apartheid movement...but [they] are still under a colonial apartheid<br />

system.’ 127 The immediate historical background to this system is succinctly summarized by<br />

125 Mandela 1995 (1994): 244. This degree of idiocy is unlikely to ever have occurred in other apartheid<br />

societies. It remains, however, a mere matter of degree. It is also idiotic to heap privileges on one atheist because<br />

he is considered a Jew, and deny them all to another atheist, who grew up around the corner from the first one,<br />

because he is considered an Arab. However, as a ‘prize’ for the imbecility of white South African racial<br />

classification practices as described here by Mandela, one might say, this form of oppression – apartheid –<br />

warrants and deserves being given an Afrikaans name.<br />

126 Commey: South Africa – Land: A Ticking Time Bomb, 2002: 12-16. Some of the white shareholders, as<br />

during the reign of political apartheid, were Europeans and Americans.<br />

127 N.N.: Arafat Aide Asks South Africa to Promote Mideast Peace, February 9, 1998. Of course modern Israel<br />

was never a colonial power in the traditional sense. Yet, the predominance of European and North American<br />

Jews in Israel and its close ties with NATO and with individual NATO member countries have in many ways<br />

made it an outpost of a North Atlantic-led global hegemonic system. See Chomsky Fateful Triangle: The United<br />

States, Israel and the Palestinians, 2 1999. There are also efforts being made to bring Israel into the European<br />

Union. In May 2003, the Israeli foreign minister, Silvan Shalom, confirmed that Israel was in fact pursuing this<br />

goal. See N.N.: Radical Deputies Urge EU Membership for Israel, January 30, 2001; N.N.: Israel Considers

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!