Apartheid
Apartheid
Apartheid
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Indeed, only half a year lies between the demise of the apartheid state and the end of<br />
the Soviet Union. South Africa and the former Soviet republics are at present also facing very<br />
similar restructuring problems manifesting themselves primarily as high unemployment, large<br />
informal economies, high crime-rates, and lingering structural and practical difficulties with<br />
adapting to globalized capitalism.<br />
There are substantial differences between apartheid South Africa and the Soviet<br />
Union, as well. Their governments were on opposite ends of the political scale, South Africa<br />
was a right-wing dictatorship, the Soviet Union a left-wing dictatorship, and they were almost<br />
at war against each other in Angola and Mozambique, whose anti-colonialist and antiapartheid<br />
movements and independent governments were supported by the Soviets. They also<br />
supported the African National Congress (ANC), the main South African resistance group, in<br />
its struggle against apartheid, though not as much as the ANC would have liked and nowhere<br />
near as much as the ANC’s African allies did. 62 At home, the Soviet elites appear to have<br />
targeted certain ethnic minorities as well as economic and cultural groups with war,<br />
discrimination and oppression, but their system of oppression was not ethnicist in kind. If<br />
anything it was an imperialist and colonialist kind of oppression, especially outside Soviet<br />
borders, in other Warsaw Pact countries, and in other more or less invaded countries, such as<br />
Afghanistan and Ethiopia. Lastly, the Soviet Communist Party was often supported by a<br />
majority at home, not least due to state-sponsored intimidation, terror, and propaganda – tools<br />
that were also employed to a great extent but were unable to triumph in forcing a similar nearconsensus<br />
in South Africa, partly because South Africa did have a far higher degree and a<br />
more obvious kind of exploitation and overt discrimination than the Soviet Union ever did.<br />
Comparisons with Other Kinds of Societies:<br />
Taliban ‘Gender <strong>Apartheid</strong>’<br />
Another society sometimes labeled ‘apartheid’ was (most of) Afghanistan under<br />
Taliban rule from 1996 to 2001. The targeted victims here were primarily women, who were<br />
separated not only from men outside of their families but also from society at large. This is<br />
how a journalist puts it: ‘Women were subjected to a dire form of gender apartheid under the<br />
Taliban. They could not attend school, were forbidden from leaving their homes without a<br />
male relative and some were beaten for exposing an ankle or too much of their wrists from<br />
under their head-to-toe veils.’ 63 This example of systematic human rights violations takes us<br />
further away from the common-sense understanding of ethnicity and ethnicism. Yet,<br />
obviously, women are biologically different from men. And that difference is in many ways<br />
greater than the biological differences between ethnicities. Gender and ethnicism, however,<br />
are in reality exclusively about culture. They are man-made forms of oppression. They are not<br />
natural, since gender and ethnicity are cultural constructs.<br />
The Taliban oppression of women was to a large extent about slavery, i.e. about<br />
unpaid, and thus devalued, housework and childrearing, which are actually important parts of<br />
a global phenomenon that has always accompanied societies that use money: patriarchy, i.e.<br />
male sexism. In Afghanistan under the Taliban, however, it went one step further. Women<br />
were not allowed to work for pay at all. The extent of the state-led oppression to which<br />
women were subjected in Afghanistan is perhaps, as we shall see in Chapter II.3.1,<br />
unparalleled in human history since the ancient Greeks, who treated their women similarly,<br />
62 Mandela 1995 (1994): 289ff. Apparently, the Soviet Union, a major diamond producer, was so weak<br />
economically that it also felt forced to come to terms with the white South Africans due to the worldwide price<br />
controls established and imposed by the giant South African diamond corporation, De Beers. See Duodu: The<br />
Oppenheimer Conundrum, 2000: 30f. Most of the ANC’s African allies were poor, newly independent, and<br />
militarily weak countries, conditions that made their assistance insufficient, especially when compared to the<br />
already militarily superior South African government’s even more powerful military allies, the USA, the UK,<br />
and Israel, in particular.<br />
63 Pleming: Afghan Women Push for End to Gender <strong>Apartheid</strong>, 2001<br />
53