Apartheid
Apartheid
Apartheid
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Third Reich Racism<br />
The South African NP had close ties with the Nationalist Socialists in Germany and<br />
openly supported them, but the former were not yet in power when World War II broke out.<br />
The slightly less racist Union Party, which had strong ties to Britain, formed the government<br />
at the time, and South Africa, a dominion of the British Empire, joined the war on the allied<br />
side against Nazi Germany. After the war, however, the NP unexpectedly won the 1948 all-<br />
White elections – they were to stay in government until 1994. Already in their first few years<br />
in power, the NP freed and rehabilitated South African Nazi supporters, some of whom had<br />
been incarcerated, including prime minister-to-be John Vorster, and (re-)introduced racist<br />
laws and covert operations reminiscent of Hitler’s ‘master race’ policies. Indeed, the racist<br />
regimes of the Third Reich and South Africa are commonly considered the worst outgrowths<br />
of white racism. 39<br />
The ideology was also strikingly similar in these cases. Winners rewrite history, but<br />
oppressors do so even more. In order to elevate themselves to superhuman or divine status, the<br />
oppressive elites even construct or re-construct religion and science. The centuries-old<br />
Afrikaner Dutch Reformed Church idea of the white invaders being ‘God’s Chosen People’ 40<br />
– which of course goes back to the millennia-old Jewish Biblical idea, if not even further –<br />
was mirrored in the Nazi notion of Aryans or Germans being ‘Nature’s Chosen People’, the<br />
insanely supposed be-all and end-all of natural selection. Especially anthropology and<br />
biology, but also the whole range of social sciences and the humanities, were systematically<br />
misused and distorted, even invented to a great extent, in order for Whites in South Africa and<br />
Germany, as well as in the rest of Western Europe, in North America and elsewhere, to<br />
earnestly and systematically attempt to prove this kind of preposterous idea. 41<br />
Again, as Whites were quickly to become in Australia, New Zealand and the USA, the<br />
German Nazis and their fellow travellers, who had after all voted Hitler into power, were a<br />
majority against their preferred victims – the ‘retarded’ and ‘handicapped’, the Jews, the Slavs<br />
(both within the German Reich and eventually throughout its conquered Lebensraum), the<br />
39<br />
Mandela 1995 (1994): 110ff; McGreal: Brothers in Arms – Israel’s Secret Pact with Pretoria (Israel and<br />
<strong>Apartheid</strong>: Part 2), 2006. The 1935 law forbidding intermarriage between Germans and Jews, for example, has<br />
few parallels aside from South African laws, and Graeco-Roman parallels in law and an Israeli parallel in<br />
institutional practice. See Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honour of 15 September 1935,<br />
in Wikipedia: Nuremberg Laws, no date. Handicapped or disabled people, and other carriers of what the Nazi<br />
state decided to consider ‘hereditary degeneracy’, were also prohibited altogether from marrying from 1935<br />
onwards. See Finkelstein, M.: The Other Victims, 2000. Already in 1933, an order was circulated forbidding<br />
Germans to marry ‘Gypsies, Negroes, and their bastard offspring’. By 1938, a “person could be judged as having<br />
too much ‘Gypsy blood’ to be allowed to live if two of the individual’s eight great-grandparents were even part<br />
Gypsy.” Miller, S.: The Road to Porrajmos: the Gypsy Holocaust, no date; see also Section II.2, below. See<br />
Kaufman: Kristallnacht, 2003: 318, for a likening of apartheid South Africa with Nazi Germany prior to the<br />
Second World War, and Mandela 2002 (1965): 30 for a likening of South Africa’s National Party government<br />
with the Nazi government of Germany.<br />
40<br />
Mandela 1995 (1994): 111. In Graeco-Roman Egypt, the qualification ‘divine’ for designating people was<br />
formally reserved for the royal families who were absolute rulers. However, many other members of the Greek<br />
upper classes also appear to have considered themselves divine or superhuman, as opposed to how they<br />
considered other people, including, especially, the indigenous Egyptians. Moreover, the general trend in Egypt<br />
during this era was the ‘de-secularization’ of society, which reached a peak during the Graeco-Roman era and<br />
could be correlated with the increasing degree of oppression. Assmann: Ma`at, Gerechtigkeit und Unsterblichkeit<br />
im Alten Ägypten, 1995 (1990): 9, 287f; Assmann: Religion und kulturelles Gedächtnis, 2000b: 204; Green:<br />
Classical Bearings: Interpreting Ancient History and Culture, 1998 (1989): 183; Gehrke: Geschichte des<br />
Hellenismus, 1990: 78ff; Kemp: How Religious were the Ancient Egyptians? 1995: 25-54. See also Chapter<br />
II.9.1, below.<br />
41<br />
Hardt & Negri: Empire, 2000: 125f; Gould: The Mismeasure of Man, 1981. On the idea of a human population<br />
being God’s Chosen People, see Section II.9, below.<br />
41