21.07.2013 Views

Apartheid

Apartheid

Apartheid

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

40<br />

by the people from the far north of the other hemisphere started in the southern extremities of<br />

the continents. And they were no doubt most destructive there. Naturally, the northern<br />

European conquerors were most interested in and likely to easily adapt to land and climate<br />

similar to what they had known in Europe.<br />

The Koori, the Aboriginal people of Australia, were reduced from one hundred to two<br />

per cent of the entire population in the space of two centuries; they were ethnically cleansed<br />

from their ancestral lands in a period of time comparable to their brethren in the Western<br />

Hemisphere. The indigenous Maori, on the other hand, still make up around ten per cent of<br />

New Zealand’s population. Hundreds of thousands of native Australians and New Zealanders<br />

were killed directly or indirectly by the white invaders. After having seen their land stolen, reappropriated,<br />

and to a large extent either destroyed or altered beyond recognition, and<br />

renamed, the remaining Koori population still suffers from grossly discriminatory treatment<br />

by Whites in the realms of police policy and practice, health care, housing, and access to<br />

education, to name but a few. Their life-expectancy is 18 to 20 years shorter than that of<br />

Australian Whites, not least because they receive 25 per cent less state health care per person<br />

than Whites do. They were only allowed to participate in elections from 1962, only three<br />

decades before Blacks were finally allowed to vote in South Africa. The 400,000 remaining<br />

Koori are the poorest and most imprisoned ethnic group in Australia today, not least because<br />

of racist police practices, but also because of the stubborn refusal, by the white governments<br />

and the white majorities who elected them, to redress or even admit the wrongs done to the<br />

indigenous. 37<br />

Once white supremacy had been established, the white elites on the southwestern<br />

Pacific Rim also flourished economically and technologically, like the ones in South Africa.<br />

Both Pacific Rim countries, however, had low initial population densities and were conquered<br />

relatively quickly. Neither of them achieved the high degrees of concentration of wealth or<br />

power that South Africa did. Being islands, they also lacked immediate threats from<br />

neighboring countries with apartheid refugees and ties to the oppressed and murdered<br />

indigenous people. During the course of colonialism, moreover, Britain had obviously also<br />

learned – the hard way – from its own older former colonies, the USA and South Africa, not<br />

to let its colonialists empower and arm themselves so much that they would become or feel<br />

enabled to secede from the mother country. And so, Australia and New Zealand never<br />

declared independence from Britain, although there were some futile attempts along those<br />

lines. Most importantly, from the theoretical perspective, the Whites soon became an<br />

overwhelming majority in both Australia and New Zealand, as in the USA or Canada, where<br />

the white elites were, not only with regard to origin and numbers, similarly genocidal in their<br />

treatment of the indigenous people. 38<br />

37 Pilger: The New Rulers of the World, 2003 (2002): 172ff; Diamond: The Third Chimpanzee: The Evolution<br />

and Future of the Human Animal, 1993 (1992); N.N.: Aborigines Riot after Death of Teen, February 16, 2004<br />

38 Stone, B.: Genocide in Australia: Report Details Crimes Against Aborigines, 1999; Fenton 1999: 41ff; Pilger:<br />

Australia: <strong>Apartheid</strong>? 2002. The latter article considers the racist attitudes towards and the ethnic cleansing and<br />

genocide of the Koori, but restricts its one-to-one comparison to the following paragraph: “Andrea Durbach,<br />

formerly of Cape Town and now a prominent human rights advocate in Sydney, said she did not believe the<br />

horrors of apartheid South Africa would ever be reproduced in Australia. ‘What may be coming is not as crude,’<br />

she said. ‘The language is not as crude. It’s much more subtle; it’s much more consensual.’” In terms of cultural<br />

and linguistic genocide, however, the ‘horrors of apartheid South Africa’ were arguably surpassed by Australia.<br />

But Durbach is almost certainly restricting her comparison to South Africa from 1948 to 1994, i.e. to apartheid in<br />

a narrow sense. During that time and since then, Australia does not match South Africa in terms of the horrors of<br />

racism, though racist crimes and structural racism against the indigenous Australians do persist. See further<br />

Pilger 2003 (2002): 12, 195f; Pilger: In John Howard’s Backyard, 2002, in which the author comes out even<br />

more directly in favor of using ‘apartheid’ and ‘genocide’ to describe white treatment of Blacks in Australia<br />

since the first invasion. See also N.N.: Australia Police Use Aborigines’ Photos as Targets, July 7, 2003; Fenton<br />

1999: 40f; N.N.: The Report of the Regional Meeting of Indigenous Peoples of Australia, New Zealand, Canada,<br />

Hawaii and the United States, on the World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and<br />

Related Intolerance held at Sydney, Australia, 2001.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!