Apartheid
Apartheid
Apartheid
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
282<br />
‘apartheid’ cannot usefully or even meaningfully be restricted to refer to policies and actions<br />
formulated and carried out by a government or state alone.<br />
With the Israeli elites so unanimously intent on warfare, so remarkably spearheaded by<br />
an opposition politician rather than the government, it calls for the earnest question whether<br />
Israel is even a democracy for its Jewish citizens. It does not appear so. How can non-elite<br />
Israelis carry any burden of responsibility for apartheid when they are being deceived by their<br />
politicians, generals and media? But they can. They do have access to foreign media, and<br />
although most of these were also deceptive in an anti-Palestinian way, many were not.<br />
Moreover, ‘Israeli Arabs’ did not swallow the lies. Finally, Israeli Jews in general have<br />
enough free time, financial and technological resources and means to inform themselves. That<br />
is their civic duty, one that they have failed. Yet most of the responsibility must lie with the<br />
Israeli elites, including also the business elites in general, i.e. not just the media, but also the<br />
advertisers.<br />
Less than 25 per cent of all those killed in the Second Intifada, so far, have been Jews.<br />
Almost all killings and clashes at first took place on occupied territory, on which the Israeli<br />
forces had moved in, surrounding and bombarding Palestinian cities, towns and settlements<br />
with tanks, artillery and (US-made and -delivered) helicopter gunships as well as (US-made<br />
and -delivered) F-16 bomber jet planes. The killings that did take place on Israeli soil in the<br />
initial fighting were the killings of 13 Israeli Arabs, some at demonstrations, some in their<br />
own homes. These killings and other attacks on Palestinians with Israeli citizenship were<br />
carried out by Jewish mobs, police and soldiers. But the US Secretary of State, Madeleine<br />
Albright, insisted that Palestinians were ‘laying siege to Israel’. 702 Youths armed with rocks<br />
besieged one of the world’s most formidable military powers! The Cable News Network<br />
(CNN), part of the largest media corporation in the world, Time Warner Turner, reported on<br />
its website on the first day of hostilities that Palestinian protesters had pelted Israeli<br />
702 Interview with Madeleine Albright, NBC ‘Meet the Press’, Sunday, October 8, 2000, quoted in Ashrawi: A<br />
Tragic Reversal: Madeleine Albright’s View of Reality, 2000 (emphasis, H.A.). According to Ashrawi, Albright<br />
even repeated herself and exclaimed: ‘Those Palestinian rock throwers have placed Israel under siege,’ adding,<br />
again, that the Israeli army is defending itself. She is also quoted thus in Said: Double Standards, 2000. Albright<br />
went on to bless the sale and delivery of more attack helicopters for the Israelis to use in assaults on Palestinian<br />
civilians, in spite of a campaign by human rights organizations such as Amnesty International, Human Rights<br />
Watch, and others, to stop the deal. See their Suspend Helicopter Sale to Israel (A Joint Letter to Madeleine K.<br />
Albright), 2000. On the continued unsuccessful efforts to stop western powers from supplying Israel with the<br />
means to commit grave human rights violations, see N.N.: Amnesty Seeks to Halt UK Arms Exports to Israel,<br />
August 16, 2001; Evans, D.: Britain Under Fire Over Israel Arms Report, 2002. After Amnesty International had<br />
published an investigative report accusing Israelis of being behind the great majority of human rights violations<br />
in the first year of the Second Intifada, Israel’s Foreign Ministry called the non-governmental human rights<br />
organization ‘biased and not objective’ and said Israel considered Amnesty International’s reports on the conflict<br />
‘a product of its political agenda’. N.N.: Amnesty International Calls for Mideast Observers, November 13,<br />
2001. On the most pro-Israeli media in the world (even more so than the Israeli media themselves), see Said:<br />
American Zionism: For US Media, Israel is the Victim, 2000. The USA is the only country in the world that has<br />
more Jewish citizens than Israel does, although Jews only make up 2 per cent of the entire US population.<br />
American Jews’ view of Israel is often a more romanticized and extremist one than that of most Israeli Jews. In<br />
both views, Arabs play an unambiguously evil role and simply do not belong. See Giacomo: Powerful U.S.<br />
Jewish Lobby Flexes Political Muscle, 2002. As a result, US citizens in general are very anti-Palestinian.<br />
Furthermore, the indoctrination in schools starts early and never lets up: ‘For decades it has been decreed to [US]<br />
schoolchildren there were no Palestinians when the Zionist pioneers arrived [in Palestine] and so those<br />
miscellaneous people who throw stones and fight occupation are simply a collection of terrorists who deserve<br />
killing. Palestinians, in short, do not deserve anything like a narrative or collective actuality, and so they must be<br />
transmuted and dissolved into essentially negative images. This is entirely the result of a distorted education,<br />
doled out to millions of youngsters who grow up without any awareness at all that the Palestinian people have<br />
been totally dehumanised to serve a political-ideological end, namely to keep support high for Israel. What is so<br />
astonishing is that notions of co-existence between peoples play no part in this kind of distortion. Whereas<br />
American Jews want to be recognised as Jews and Americans in America, they are unwilling to accord a similar<br />
status as Arabs and Palestinians to another people that has been oppressed by Israel since the beginning.’ Said:<br />
Crisis for American Jews, 2002