Apartheid

Apartheid Apartheid

media.manila.at
from media.manila.at More from this publisher
21.07.2013 Views

270 Africans), but they are being oppressed by a society which was closely allied to the apartheid oppressors of South Africa. Both of the latter were mostly close allies of and aided by the USA and western Europe. The differences between the main victims are thus fairly equal in kind. The main perpetrators, however, are all European or of European descent. This has some theoretical significance, because Palestinians are among the many latter-day victims to the same racist, hegemonic idea of ‘European’ excellence and dominance that Africans (and others) were and are. This idea is described succinctly in Edward Said’s ‘Orientalism’: [A] collective notion identifying ‘us’ Europeans as against all ‘those’ non-Europeans, and indeed it can be argued that the major component in European culture is precisely what made that culture hegemonic both in and outside Europe: the idea of European identity as a superior one in comparison with all the non-European peoples and cultures. 665 The US Empire, which during the 20 th century took over the reins as the world’s leading military, political and economic power from the last hegemonic European one, the British Empire, is as connected to it as ancient Rome was to ancient Greece, if not even closer. The North American elites today generally speak English, a European language, whereas the Romans mainly spoke Latin, not Greek. In any case, western Europe has made sure it will not upset the new master, again like the late ancient Greeks did not anger Rome, with a few exceptions in both instances. In each case, the earlier hegemonic power found it relatively easy to switch its opportunist strategy from that of a supreme oppressor to that of a privileged collaborator, as for instance observable in the UK’s behavior in the US-led wars on Iraq and others during the last decades. The ethnicist, hegemonic culture was also transplanted westwards with surprising smoothness and continuity in both cases. Today, the Palestinians, and Arabs in general, are culturally mainly victims of American, white, and western European ethnicism. The web of racism, cultural stereotypes, political imperialism, dehumanizing ideology holding in the Arab or the Muslim is very strong indeed, and it is this web which every Palestinian has come to feel as his uniquely punishing destiny. 666 Since many Jews have worked hard and earnestly at assimilating – for instance, they have intermarried with Europeans (but also, marginally, with others) for centuries – they themselves have been able to ‘pass’ as Whites, and their Jewish religion as an integral part of the ‘western’ cultural heritage. The other Semitic-speaking peoples, however, are neither considered white, nor western, nor European. Their chief religion, Islam, comparably similar to Christianity, and similarly intertwined historically, has not been considered part of ‘western’ or European culture. One often speaks of ‘Judeo-Christian civilization’ today without even considering the exclusivist aspects of this expression. If labels for civilizations must be religious, then the ‘Christian-Muslim’, ‘Islamo-Christian’, and ‘Judeo-Muslim’ or ‘Islamo-Jewish’ civilizations are in fact at least as important realities as the ‘Judeo-Christian’ one is. In fact, the expression ‘Judeo-Christian’ was hardly ever used prior to the Second World War. Its current popularity is due to sympathy towards Jews after the Holocaust, guilt over the Holocaust, as well as a thus far rather successful concerted attempt to create and uphold emotional and spiritual distance and prejudice towards Islam. 667 665 2 Said 1979 (1978): 7. Said refers to Hay: Europe: The Emergence of an Idea, 1968. 666 Ibid.: 27; Löwstedt 2004 667 Nettnin: Islamo-Christian Civilization, 2005

271 This prevalent hypocrisy inherent in treating Jews as ‘westerners’ and Muslims as ‘non-westerners’ is all the more annoying to Palestinians, since Zionism usually lays claim to Palestine without invoking the fact that Jewish people and cultures have always mixed with European (and other) people and cultures, but rather by claiming the opposite of that idea, namely, the idea of Jewish ethnic and cultural purity and Jewish uniqueness. The situation of Sephardic or Oriental Jews in Israel further illustrates the European lop-sidedness of Israeli elite culture. Sephardic Jews today make up around one third of all Jews in Israel. They are very poorly represented in the elites, who proudly nurture their European roots, while tacitly or loudly accusing Sephardic Jews of having avoided the Holocaust. Thus, the descendants of Holocaust survivors somehow manage to consider themselves superior, by invoking their origins in the historically worst judeophobic area in the world, as if the European experience were better for Jews than the much less devastating experience among Muslims and Arabs. There is also a color-coded racism involved here since the European Jews generally have lighter skin. 668 In 1896, the father of Zionism, Theodor Herzl, wrote in his ‘Judenstaat’ that the Jewish state would constitute a ‘fortification’, or a ‘wall’ of ‘civilization against barbarity’, meaning Muslim or Arab culture. This idea has been plausibly linked to one of Ariel Sharon’s many illegal legacies: the infamous apartheid wall (see Chapter II.6.3, above). It could also be considered a legacy in the so-called ‘Iron Wall’, the militaristic, hard-line Israeli, yet mainstream Zionist policy of never negotiating with Arabs except from a position of military strength. 669 There is nothing at all idealistic, in a humanist sense, about Zionism. The eminent Israeli historian who brought the central importance of the Iron Wall doctrine for Zionist and Israeli politics to the attention of the world, Avi Shlaim, has also identified Zionism’s fundamental if not fundamentalist opportunism. Zionists never chiefly negotiated with Palestinians about anything in Palestine. Their main negotiating partners about everything in Palestine have been, in chronological order, the Ottomans, the British, and the Americans, i.e. whoever was most powerful in the region at the time. 670 In this regard, Jewish nationalism has also been compared to Darwinian nationalism and ethnicism: ‘the fittest (nation or people) survives’. 671 And to ensure that, apparently, all and any tricks are basically allowed. Zionism and Social Darwinism both belong to the ‘web of ideas’ that Said describes. They are both products of late 19 th -century European elitist thought. The following quote from the then Israeli foreign minister, Shimon Peres, brings home the eminent applicability of the term ‘ethnicism’ for Zionism: ‘There were Palestinians who lived on that land but were never a people, and there were Jews who were a people but who never had a land.’ 672 Groups of human beings (or super-human beings) who are ‘people’ apparently deserve land and statehood, whereas groups of humans (or sub-human beings) who are not ‘people’ do not even deserve the most basic of human rights. This use of the term,’people’, is indeed very similar to the dominant use of the German concept of ‘Volk’ 668 Plathe: Viele Israeli mögen nicht zum Nahen Osten gehören: Die arabische Welt ist ganz nah und wird geschmäht, 2004 669 Bunzl: Der Wall, der Zaun, die Mauer, 2004. The German original quote from Herzl in Bunzl’s rendition is: ‘Wall der Zivilisation gegen die Barbarei’. See also Schoenman: The Hidden History of Zionism, 1988; and Shlaim 2001 (2000): 4: Herzl ‘viewed the natives [of Palestine] as primitive and backward, and his attitude towards them was rather patronizing’. See, further, the thoughtful review of Shlaim’s book: Halper: Eight Decades of the ‘Iron Wall’ Concept, 2001: 97-102. 670 Shlaim 2001 (2000): 17f. 671 2 Ezrah: Rubber Bullets, 1998: 89; Chomsky 1999: 153ff 672 Quoted in Pumpyansky July 2002; see footnote 19 and Ashrawi: Peace in the Middle East: A Global Challenge and a Human Imperative, 2003, where Ashrawi speaks of the “myth of a ‘land without a people for a people without a land’ that has long framed the rationalization for the most extreme forms of Zionism that sought to deny the very existence and humanity of the Palestinians.” On the genocidal/pro-ethnic cleansing aspects of Zionist ideology, see further Said 1992 (1979): 83ff, and Chapters II.1.3 and II.2.3, above.

270<br />

Africans), but they are being oppressed by a society which was closely allied to the apartheid<br />

oppressors of South Africa. Both of the latter were mostly close allies of and aided by the<br />

USA and western Europe. The differences between the main victims are thus fairly equal in<br />

kind.<br />

The main perpetrators, however, are all European or of European descent. This has<br />

some theoretical significance, because Palestinians are among the many latter-day victims to<br />

the same racist, hegemonic idea of ‘European’ excellence and dominance that Africans (and<br />

others) were and are. This idea is described succinctly in Edward Said’s ‘Orientalism’:<br />

[A] collective notion identifying ‘us’ Europeans as against all ‘those’<br />

non-Europeans, and indeed it can be argued that the major<br />

component in European culture is precisely what made that culture<br />

hegemonic both in and outside Europe: the idea of European identity<br />

as a superior one in comparison with all the non-European peoples<br />

and cultures. 665<br />

The US Empire, which during the 20 th century took over the reins as the world’s<br />

leading military, political and economic power from the last hegemonic European one, the<br />

British Empire, is as connected to it as ancient Rome was to ancient Greece, if not even closer.<br />

The North American elites today generally speak English, a European language, whereas the<br />

Romans mainly spoke Latin, not Greek. In any case, western Europe has made sure it will not<br />

upset the new master, again like the late ancient Greeks did not anger Rome, with a few<br />

exceptions in both instances. In each case, the earlier hegemonic power found it relatively<br />

easy to switch its opportunist strategy from that of a supreme oppressor to that of a privileged<br />

collaborator, as for instance observable in the UK’s behavior in the US-led wars on Iraq and<br />

others during the last decades. The ethnicist, hegemonic culture was also transplanted<br />

westwards with surprising smoothness and continuity in both cases. Today, the Palestinians,<br />

and Arabs in general, are culturally mainly victims of American, white, and western European<br />

ethnicism.<br />

The web of racism, cultural stereotypes, political imperialism,<br />

dehumanizing ideology holding in the Arab or the Muslim is very<br />

strong indeed, and it is this web which every Palestinian has come to<br />

feel as his uniquely punishing destiny. 666<br />

Since many Jews have worked hard and earnestly at assimilating – for instance, they<br />

have intermarried with Europeans (but also, marginally, with others) for centuries – they<br />

themselves have been able to ‘pass’ as Whites, and their Jewish religion as an integral part of<br />

the ‘western’ cultural heritage. The other Semitic-speaking peoples, however, are neither<br />

considered white, nor western, nor European. Their chief religion, Islam, comparably similar<br />

to Christianity, and similarly intertwined historically, has not been considered part of<br />

‘western’ or European culture. One often speaks of ‘Judeo-Christian civilization’ today<br />

without even considering the exclusivist aspects of this expression. If labels for civilizations<br />

must be religious, then the ‘Christian-Muslim’, ‘Islamo-Christian’, and ‘Judeo-Muslim’ or<br />

‘Islamo-Jewish’ civilizations are in fact at least as important realities as the ‘Judeo-Christian’<br />

one is. In fact, the expression ‘Judeo-Christian’ was hardly ever used prior to the Second<br />

World War. Its current popularity is due to sympathy towards Jews after the Holocaust, guilt<br />

over the Holocaust, as well as a thus far rather successful concerted attempt to create and<br />

uphold emotional and spiritual distance and prejudice towards Islam. 667<br />

665 2<br />

Said 1979 (1978): 7. Said refers to Hay: Europe: The Emergence of an Idea, 1968.<br />

666<br />

Ibid.: 27; Löwstedt 2004<br />

667<br />

Nettnin: Islamo-Christian Civilization, 2005

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!