Apartheid
Apartheid Apartheid
270 Africans), but they are being oppressed by a society which was closely allied to the apartheid oppressors of South Africa. Both of the latter were mostly close allies of and aided by the USA and western Europe. The differences between the main victims are thus fairly equal in kind. The main perpetrators, however, are all European or of European descent. This has some theoretical significance, because Palestinians are among the many latter-day victims to the same racist, hegemonic idea of ‘European’ excellence and dominance that Africans (and others) were and are. This idea is described succinctly in Edward Said’s ‘Orientalism’: [A] collective notion identifying ‘us’ Europeans as against all ‘those’ non-Europeans, and indeed it can be argued that the major component in European culture is precisely what made that culture hegemonic both in and outside Europe: the idea of European identity as a superior one in comparison with all the non-European peoples and cultures. 665 The US Empire, which during the 20 th century took over the reins as the world’s leading military, political and economic power from the last hegemonic European one, the British Empire, is as connected to it as ancient Rome was to ancient Greece, if not even closer. The North American elites today generally speak English, a European language, whereas the Romans mainly spoke Latin, not Greek. In any case, western Europe has made sure it will not upset the new master, again like the late ancient Greeks did not anger Rome, with a few exceptions in both instances. In each case, the earlier hegemonic power found it relatively easy to switch its opportunist strategy from that of a supreme oppressor to that of a privileged collaborator, as for instance observable in the UK’s behavior in the US-led wars on Iraq and others during the last decades. The ethnicist, hegemonic culture was also transplanted westwards with surprising smoothness and continuity in both cases. Today, the Palestinians, and Arabs in general, are culturally mainly victims of American, white, and western European ethnicism. The web of racism, cultural stereotypes, political imperialism, dehumanizing ideology holding in the Arab or the Muslim is very strong indeed, and it is this web which every Palestinian has come to feel as his uniquely punishing destiny. 666 Since many Jews have worked hard and earnestly at assimilating – for instance, they have intermarried with Europeans (but also, marginally, with others) for centuries – they themselves have been able to ‘pass’ as Whites, and their Jewish religion as an integral part of the ‘western’ cultural heritage. The other Semitic-speaking peoples, however, are neither considered white, nor western, nor European. Their chief religion, Islam, comparably similar to Christianity, and similarly intertwined historically, has not been considered part of ‘western’ or European culture. One often speaks of ‘Judeo-Christian civilization’ today without even considering the exclusivist aspects of this expression. If labels for civilizations must be religious, then the ‘Christian-Muslim’, ‘Islamo-Christian’, and ‘Judeo-Muslim’ or ‘Islamo-Jewish’ civilizations are in fact at least as important realities as the ‘Judeo-Christian’ one is. In fact, the expression ‘Judeo-Christian’ was hardly ever used prior to the Second World War. Its current popularity is due to sympathy towards Jews after the Holocaust, guilt over the Holocaust, as well as a thus far rather successful concerted attempt to create and uphold emotional and spiritual distance and prejudice towards Islam. 667 665 2 Said 1979 (1978): 7. Said refers to Hay: Europe: The Emergence of an Idea, 1968. 666 Ibid.: 27; Löwstedt 2004 667 Nettnin: Islamo-Christian Civilization, 2005
271 This prevalent hypocrisy inherent in treating Jews as ‘westerners’ and Muslims as ‘non-westerners’ is all the more annoying to Palestinians, since Zionism usually lays claim to Palestine without invoking the fact that Jewish people and cultures have always mixed with European (and other) people and cultures, but rather by claiming the opposite of that idea, namely, the idea of Jewish ethnic and cultural purity and Jewish uniqueness. The situation of Sephardic or Oriental Jews in Israel further illustrates the European lop-sidedness of Israeli elite culture. Sephardic Jews today make up around one third of all Jews in Israel. They are very poorly represented in the elites, who proudly nurture their European roots, while tacitly or loudly accusing Sephardic Jews of having avoided the Holocaust. Thus, the descendants of Holocaust survivors somehow manage to consider themselves superior, by invoking their origins in the historically worst judeophobic area in the world, as if the European experience were better for Jews than the much less devastating experience among Muslims and Arabs. There is also a color-coded racism involved here since the European Jews generally have lighter skin. 668 In 1896, the father of Zionism, Theodor Herzl, wrote in his ‘Judenstaat’ that the Jewish state would constitute a ‘fortification’, or a ‘wall’ of ‘civilization against barbarity’, meaning Muslim or Arab culture. This idea has been plausibly linked to one of Ariel Sharon’s many illegal legacies: the infamous apartheid wall (see Chapter II.6.3, above). It could also be considered a legacy in the so-called ‘Iron Wall’, the militaristic, hard-line Israeli, yet mainstream Zionist policy of never negotiating with Arabs except from a position of military strength. 669 There is nothing at all idealistic, in a humanist sense, about Zionism. The eminent Israeli historian who brought the central importance of the Iron Wall doctrine for Zionist and Israeli politics to the attention of the world, Avi Shlaim, has also identified Zionism’s fundamental if not fundamentalist opportunism. Zionists never chiefly negotiated with Palestinians about anything in Palestine. Their main negotiating partners about everything in Palestine have been, in chronological order, the Ottomans, the British, and the Americans, i.e. whoever was most powerful in the region at the time. 670 In this regard, Jewish nationalism has also been compared to Darwinian nationalism and ethnicism: ‘the fittest (nation or people) survives’. 671 And to ensure that, apparently, all and any tricks are basically allowed. Zionism and Social Darwinism both belong to the ‘web of ideas’ that Said describes. They are both products of late 19 th -century European elitist thought. The following quote from the then Israeli foreign minister, Shimon Peres, brings home the eminent applicability of the term ‘ethnicism’ for Zionism: ‘There were Palestinians who lived on that land but were never a people, and there were Jews who were a people but who never had a land.’ 672 Groups of human beings (or super-human beings) who are ‘people’ apparently deserve land and statehood, whereas groups of humans (or sub-human beings) who are not ‘people’ do not even deserve the most basic of human rights. This use of the term,’people’, is indeed very similar to the dominant use of the German concept of ‘Volk’ 668 Plathe: Viele Israeli mögen nicht zum Nahen Osten gehören: Die arabische Welt ist ganz nah und wird geschmäht, 2004 669 Bunzl: Der Wall, der Zaun, die Mauer, 2004. The German original quote from Herzl in Bunzl’s rendition is: ‘Wall der Zivilisation gegen die Barbarei’. See also Schoenman: The Hidden History of Zionism, 1988; and Shlaim 2001 (2000): 4: Herzl ‘viewed the natives [of Palestine] as primitive and backward, and his attitude towards them was rather patronizing’. See, further, the thoughtful review of Shlaim’s book: Halper: Eight Decades of the ‘Iron Wall’ Concept, 2001: 97-102. 670 Shlaim 2001 (2000): 17f. 671 2 Ezrah: Rubber Bullets, 1998: 89; Chomsky 1999: 153ff 672 Quoted in Pumpyansky July 2002; see footnote 19 and Ashrawi: Peace in the Middle East: A Global Challenge and a Human Imperative, 2003, where Ashrawi speaks of the “myth of a ‘land without a people for a people without a land’ that has long framed the rationalization for the most extreme forms of Zionism that sought to deny the very existence and humanity of the Palestinians.” On the genocidal/pro-ethnic cleansing aspects of Zionist ideology, see further Said 1992 (1979): 83ff, and Chapters II.1.3 and II.2.3, above.
- Page 219 and 220: 219 that in the Palestinian territo
- Page 221 and 222: 221 Third World citizens or worse:
- Page 223 and 224: 223 Manetho’s account. 501 From M
- Page 225 and 226: From the second and third centuries
- Page 227 and 228: education is inferior and a crime a
- Page 229 and 230: 229 on the other hand, aid from the
- Page 231 and 232: 8. Language Who is to say that robb
- Page 233 and 234: 233 case in the Americas during the
- Page 235 and 236: therefore throws into high profile
- Page 237 and 238: 237 Today, there are still many tow
- Page 239 and 240: 239 Learning Hebrew, on the other h
- Page 241 and 242: 241 be overemphasized. The South Af
- Page 243 and 244: 243 It might seem vastly exaggerate
- Page 245 and 246: 245 and it continued throughout the
- Page 247 and 248: 247 A prime example of the classica
- Page 249 and 250: 249 greedy, cunning, unreliable and
- Page 251 and 252: 251 behind nuclear physics being su
- Page 253 and 254: 253 argued, already in the sixth ce
- Page 255 and 256: 255 at the end of the 19 th century
- Page 257 and 258: Inevitably, these racist stereotype
- Page 259 and 260: 259 edge of the sword’ (ibid: 6:2
- Page 261 and 262: 261 be denied access to or be expel
- Page 263 and 264: 263 ‘unified’ their countries d
- Page 265 and 266: 265 can be observed as in the cases
- Page 267 and 268: 267 of Arabs that are essentially t
- Page 269: 269 shocking and unacceptable as th
- Page 273 and 274: inclusive, democratic and secular v
- Page 275 and 276: 275 The misrepresentation and the l
- Page 277 and 278: 277 militants on September 5-6, 197
- Page 279 and 280: 279 Palestinian and otherwise, are
- Page 281 and 282: on Soviet Jewish immigration. 699 2
- Page 283 and 284: 283 worshippers at the Wailing Wall
- Page 285 and 286: 285 most expensive propaganda enter
- Page 287 and 288: 287 1948 - or actually accompanied
- Page 289 and 290: 289 corresponding way, as majority
- Page 291 and 292: 291 dependent on Israeli and US dir
- Page 293 and 294: 293 may yet take a long time until
- Page 295 and 296: 295 with the vast majority of atten
- Page 297 and 298: 297 There is an enormous potential
- Page 299 and 300: 299 Moreover, if laws and decrees a
- Page 301 and 302: 301 Palestinian violence. 6. All Is
- Page 303 and 304: 303 started working in 1996. But fo
- Page 305 and 306: 305 disappeared, it may drop Israel
- Page 307 and 308: 307 law, is not justice and it neve
- Page 309 and 310: 309 around, the future for justice
- Page 311 and 312: 311 Expressions in 2005, while 148
- Page 313 and 314: 313 meaningful way to their pre-vic
- Page 315 and 316: Bibliography 315 Abashiya-Malepe, M
- Page 317 and 318: 317 Amnesty International & Human R
- Page 319 and 320: 319 Barghouti, Omar: The Israeli El
270<br />
Africans), but they are being oppressed by a society which was closely allied to the apartheid<br />
oppressors of South Africa. Both of the latter were mostly close allies of and aided by the<br />
USA and western Europe. The differences between the main victims are thus fairly equal in<br />
kind.<br />
The main perpetrators, however, are all European or of European descent. This has<br />
some theoretical significance, because Palestinians are among the many latter-day victims to<br />
the same racist, hegemonic idea of ‘European’ excellence and dominance that Africans (and<br />
others) were and are. This idea is described succinctly in Edward Said’s ‘Orientalism’:<br />
[A] collective notion identifying ‘us’ Europeans as against all ‘those’<br />
non-Europeans, and indeed it can be argued that the major<br />
component in European culture is precisely what made that culture<br />
hegemonic both in and outside Europe: the idea of European identity<br />
as a superior one in comparison with all the non-European peoples<br />
and cultures. 665<br />
The US Empire, which during the 20 th century took over the reins as the world’s<br />
leading military, political and economic power from the last hegemonic European one, the<br />
British Empire, is as connected to it as ancient Rome was to ancient Greece, if not even closer.<br />
The North American elites today generally speak English, a European language, whereas the<br />
Romans mainly spoke Latin, not Greek. In any case, western Europe has made sure it will not<br />
upset the new master, again like the late ancient Greeks did not anger Rome, with a few<br />
exceptions in both instances. In each case, the earlier hegemonic power found it relatively<br />
easy to switch its opportunist strategy from that of a supreme oppressor to that of a privileged<br />
collaborator, as for instance observable in the UK’s behavior in the US-led wars on Iraq and<br />
others during the last decades. The ethnicist, hegemonic culture was also transplanted<br />
westwards with surprising smoothness and continuity in both cases. Today, the Palestinians,<br />
and Arabs in general, are culturally mainly victims of American, white, and western European<br />
ethnicism.<br />
The web of racism, cultural stereotypes, political imperialism,<br />
dehumanizing ideology holding in the Arab or the Muslim is very<br />
strong indeed, and it is this web which every Palestinian has come to<br />
feel as his uniquely punishing destiny. 666<br />
Since many Jews have worked hard and earnestly at assimilating – for instance, they<br />
have intermarried with Europeans (but also, marginally, with others) for centuries – they<br />
themselves have been able to ‘pass’ as Whites, and their Jewish religion as an integral part of<br />
the ‘western’ cultural heritage. The other Semitic-speaking peoples, however, are neither<br />
considered white, nor western, nor European. Their chief religion, Islam, comparably similar<br />
to Christianity, and similarly intertwined historically, has not been considered part of<br />
‘western’ or European culture. One often speaks of ‘Judeo-Christian civilization’ today<br />
without even considering the exclusivist aspects of this expression. If labels for civilizations<br />
must be religious, then the ‘Christian-Muslim’, ‘Islamo-Christian’, and ‘Judeo-Muslim’ or<br />
‘Islamo-Jewish’ civilizations are in fact at least as important realities as the ‘Judeo-Christian’<br />
one is. In fact, the expression ‘Judeo-Christian’ was hardly ever used prior to the Second<br />
World War. Its current popularity is due to sympathy towards Jews after the Holocaust, guilt<br />
over the Holocaust, as well as a thus far rather successful concerted attempt to create and<br />
uphold emotional and spiritual distance and prejudice towards Islam. 667<br />
665 2<br />
Said 1979 (1978): 7. Said refers to Hay: Europe: The Emergence of an Idea, 1968.<br />
666<br />
Ibid.: 27; Löwstedt 2004<br />
667<br />
Nettnin: Islamo-Christian Civilization, 2005