Apartheid
Apartheid
Apartheid
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
267<br />
of Arabs that are essentially the same as the racist images of Jews promoted by the Nazi<br />
German film industry. The similarities do in fact seem to outnumber the differences by far.<br />
The most important difference, it should be mentioned, is that there are in fact a few<br />
exceptions to Anti-Arab and anti-Muslim propaganda (still) coming out of Hollywood, but at<br />
the time of writing there are hardly any. In Nazi Germany, however, there were of course no<br />
exceptions to anti-Jewish propaganda in the rigidly state-controlled national and local mass<br />
media. 656 Jews, on the other hand, have due to Hollywood become the film victims of racism<br />
par excellence. I am not saying that the Nazi death camps at Auschwitz and elsewhere did not<br />
contain some of the worst manifestations of racism in history. They did. But the American<br />
filmmakers have since almost made genocide, in the popular mind, synonymous with<br />
Auschwitz, thus also sweeping under the carpet the white-led genocides in the Western<br />
Hemisphere and others, as well as the ideologically very inconvenient fact that wealth and<br />
power of the western Europeans and North Americans today depend on gains made from<br />
those conquests, genocides, and the unparalleled theft and exploitation that came with them.<br />
And the idea of an incompatibility between Judaism and Islam, or between Jews and Arabs, is<br />
further fueled by European repression of European anti-Semitism through history. ‘They’ are<br />
the extremes, whereas ‘we’ – the Europeans, the Christians – are in-between, calm, and peaceloving.<br />
Nothing could be further from the truth. The crusades as well as the Christian Roman<br />
Empire, for instance, reveal this attitude to be an upside-down account of intercultural<br />
relations historically.<br />
Out of hundreds of movies since 1980, Jack Shaheen, the Arab-American film critic<br />
and author of ‘Reel Bad Arabs: How Hollywood Vilifies a People’, and ‘The TV Arab’, found<br />
only 12 that contained positive portrayals of Arab people. Dating back to 1914, but especially<br />
since the end of the Cold War, Hollywood has presented Arabs as ‘quintessential evil’. For<br />
instance, the 2000 Paramount release, ‘Rules of Engagement’, shows Arab children and<br />
women firing at and killing heroic US elite soldiers by deviously using firearms hidden under<br />
their clothes during a stone-throwing demonstration outside the US Embassy in Sana’a,<br />
Yemen. To the best of my knowledge, it is the only work of fiction that effectively manages to<br />
accuse women and children – facing armed, foreign, elite soldiers employed by the world’s<br />
sole military superpower – of cowardice! That film and 13 others that show Americans killing<br />
Arabs (including women and children) credit the US Defense Department for providing<br />
equipment, personnel and technical assistance. The prevalent anti-Arab racism in the US,<br />
however, must also partly be blamed on the strong effects of an older, eurocentric tradition of<br />
Orientalism, as Edward Said has shown.<br />
The American literary critic, Greta D. Little, has identified five stereotypes that have<br />
persisted during the last two-and-a-half centuries of western literature on Arabs for adults and<br />
children: 1.) Arabs are dirty and lazy. 2.) Arabs are ignorant, superstitious and silly. 3.) Arabs<br />
are irrational, cruel, and violent. 4.) Arabs mistreat women. 5.) Arabs hate Christians and<br />
engage in the slave trade (nowadays: in hostage-taking). Of course, there are exceptions, but,<br />
again, not many, and not prominent. Moreover, Arabs are portrayed in centuries of western<br />
literature as needing western guidance and western values. One of the worst examples of this<br />
kind of racism is the book, ‘The Arab Mind’, by Raphael Patai, which was published in 1976.<br />
The book was being used as late as 2003 by the US military to brainwash its own soldiers in<br />
preparation for invading Iraq and for the ensuing US military occupation of that country. Its<br />
long chapter on the purported Arab sexual taboo ridden with shame and repression is<br />
supposed to have shaped US military torture techniques during that occupation, as<br />
exemplified in the infamous Abu Ghraib prison murders and extreme humiliation of<br />
indigenous suspects by illegal US occupation personnel. 657<br />
656 Sardar: Orientalism, 1999: 95ff<br />
657 Shalal-Esa: Writer Documents Hollywood’s Vilification of Arabs, 2001. See also Shaheen: “Rules of<br />
Engagement”: A Highwater Mark in Hollywood Hate Mongering with U.S. Military “Cooperation”, 2000: 15f,