Apartheid

Apartheid Apartheid

media.manila.at
from media.manila.at More from this publisher
21.07.2013 Views

260 opposed to the allegedly revelatory – claim to Palestine. (And the revelatory claim must by its own very nature remain ethnocentric in kind.) Many non-Jews have in fact converted to Judaism through history, mainly through intermarriage, but also collectives, for example, the inhabitants of the Khazar Empire, which consisted of an almost entirely non-Semitic population in a large area around the Caspian Sea. The Khazars converted to Judaism in the seventh and eighth centuries AD for political reasons (mainly in order to buttress the pressures from the neighboring Muslim and Christian powers). The Khazar Empire was eventually destroyed by Mongol invaders, and a great portion of its inhabitants fled, mainly into what is today Eastern Europe. Of course, this renders the ethnicist, apartheid Basic ‘Law of Return’ to Israel for all Jews (and for Jews only) arbitrary and even senseless if Jewishness is to be defined biologically, as well as plain discriminatory. Furthermore, around one million Jews – and 300,000 others who have become or are in the process of becoming Jews – have emigrated from the former Soviet Union to Israel. There are still another million Jews in Russia today, and many Zionists are doing their best to entice them and many others to immigrate to Israel. 640 The first break-up of the proto-Afroasiatic language – the hypothesized ancestor of the Semitic languages (including Hebrew and Arabic) as well as of ancient Egyptian, Hausa and Iraqw (spoken in Nigeria and Tanzania today) and other languages – is commonly assumed to have taken place no more than 10,000 years ago. The people who spoke this language most likely resided near or in the northern part of the East African Rift valley. All six or more branches of the Afroasiatic language family except the Semitic branch are geographically and historically confined to Africa. Moreover, the Semitic sub-family is also confined to Africa except for a minority of languages, including Arabic and Hebrew. 12 of the 19 Semitic languages still spoken today are only spoken in Ethiopia. 641 It therefore makes much sense to assume that the ancestors of many if not most Jews and Palestinians were all Africans as recently as 10,000 years ago. 642 At the very same time, however, there was already a fortified village at Jericho in Palestine, undoubtedly populated by non-Semites. Thus, the Israeli constitutional claims to Palestine, Cana’an or the area ‘from the river of Egypt unto…Euphrates’ as primordially Jewish land are rendered even more senseless. The Palestinians, however, are tied to the land in an unbroken chain at least since long before the British mandate, not unlike the dispossessed Blacks in Rhodesia. Not only the landowners and the former landowners among the Palestinians should be counted here, but also those who belong to the land, and to whom the land belongs in a cultural sense. Nonetheless, some Jews – and it is practically impossible to say who – do have a kind of relationship with historical Palestine which is historically deeper than the Whites’ to South Africa: a difference of degree, however, rather than of kind. A culture, which has for a long time reiterated the phrase ‘Next year in Jerusalem’, should not be expelled from it, nor be denied access to the city. However, there is, crucially, nothing in this phrase that implies statehood for the Jewish people, nor is there anything that prescribes exclusion of others from Jerusalem. Primarily, the phrase expresses and symbolizes hope for the future as well as commemorating pain over expulsion. It is also a reference to the Kingdom of Heaven, which is by definition not a place on earth. If Jews come in peace or live in peace, why should they 640 See Koestler: The Thirteenth Tribe: The Khazar Empire and Its Heritage, 1976, Wexler: The Khazars, The Writings of Israel Shamir, no date. See also N.N.: Russia’s Putin Meets Jewish Leaders, March 19, 2002 and footnotes 338-343, above. For the wider problem of biased justification attempts through history and especially through archaeology, see Fagan: Israel – Archaeology (General Feature): Digging for History or Politics in Israel? 2000; Said 2003: 45-50. Against the grain of recent, mainly biblically and nationalistically inspired, Israeli archaeology, Leeman 2004 argues that the origin of the Jewish religion may lie in Western Arabia. On the intellectual appropriation (and obfuscation) of Historical Palestine, which has retroactively obliterated Palestinian history or turned it into footnotes of Israeli history, see Whitelam 1996. 641 Diamond 1998 (1997): 383 642 Bernal 1991 (1987): 11f

261 be denied access to or be expelled from the city? A truly liberated Jerusalem should therefore be accessible to all, regardless of religion or ethnicity, and without exception. 643 Similarly, White families who have inhabited South Africa for three centuries or more could not possibly be expected to feel that any other place is home. The Jews have an older recorded relationship with Palestine than the Whites to South Africa, but it is cultural, not ethnic or biological, and it cannot be respected as an exclusive claim by any reading of international law or secular ethics informed by the concept of equal human rights. Furthermore, it is not an unbroken relationship. In political and judicial regards, it is both ancient and very recent, but with large gaps and discontinuities. Muslims, Christians, and others, need to be respected equally for their special relationship to the land, to the ancient institutions, and to the symbols of their faiths. The descendants of the first white settlers in the Cape may, on the other hand, have more ancestors born in South Africa than modern Israeli Jews who descend from ancient ones have in Israel, modern and ancient, in relative as well as absolute numbers. Furthermore, archaeoanthropologically speaking, all human beings have African heritage. In this sense, all Whites who came to South Africa came home, whereas all Jews who came to Israel certainly did not come home in any biological sense whatsoever. Most importantly, however, the Zionists responsible for systematic gross human rights violations in Palestine since 1948 cannot be exonerated on any form of historical or religious grounds, since the Jews’ alleged exclusive right to the land is practically nullified by the historical distance. The final loss of sovereignty by Jews over (some of) the land that other Jews now occupy to the Romans over 2,000 years ago simply cannot be rectified, since the Roman Empire no longer exists. For Jews to claim the land ‘back’ on historical grounds would be akin to Mayans – assuming they had an independent homeland – today claiming land back that they had lost to the Toltecs, long before any Spaniards, French or Austrians, the next great waves of invaders, even knew about what is today Mexico, Honduras and Guatemala. In the USA it would mean that 99 per cent of the population would have to leave, and with better justification, since it was only invaded a quarter of the years ago compared with the Jews, and since the same white ethnicity has held power and wealth in the USA ever since; in Britain, about as many would have to hand over all their land to the Celts and the Welsh. The historical claim to Israel by Jews and for Jews alone, therefore, is a preposterous and extremely arrogant claim, not matched by any other people’s claims to land. Attempts at Zionist justification usually pursues the same logic but in a different, more secular way. It starts with the alleged need for a Jewish state, and then asks: where should we put it? Since the Jewish claim on the rest of the world is even more tenuous, that leaves only Palestine. The Greeks’ relationship with Egypt prior to their de facto invasion was of yet another kind: at times intense cultural interaction, trade and Greek mercenary services. Whether the depth of that relationship can be compared at all with the depth of Jewish ties to historical Palestine is hard, if not impossible, to determine. Obviously, the Greeks had had a more intense relationship with Egypt during the centuries preceding invasion. But the Jews had had a more intense relationship in the few decades preceding invasion of Palestine, most conspicuously Zionist plans and activities (including terrorist activities against both Palestinians and British colonialists) to bring about that invasion. The Israeli ex-prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, has described this secular view of the nature of the relationship between Jews and the lands of Israel and Palestine as a kind of eurocentric illusion, and, ultimately, an ‘Arab lie’: Almost all European nations have had the experience of colonialism, 643 Cunin: This Year in Jerusalem, no date; Starhawk: Next Year in Mas’Ha, 2003. Jerusalem has of course also been interpreted as a spiritual place. See Löwstedt: Jerusalem in My Heart, 2005.

260<br />

opposed to the allegedly revelatory – claim to Palestine. (And the revelatory claim must by its<br />

own very nature remain ethnocentric in kind.) Many non-Jews have in fact converted to<br />

Judaism through history, mainly through intermarriage, but also collectives, for example, the<br />

inhabitants of the Khazar Empire, which consisted of an almost entirely non-Semitic<br />

population in a large area around the Caspian Sea. The Khazars converted to Judaism in the<br />

seventh and eighth centuries AD for political reasons (mainly in order to buttress the pressures<br />

from the neighboring Muslim and Christian powers). The Khazar Empire was eventually<br />

destroyed by Mongol invaders, and a great portion of its inhabitants fled, mainly into what is<br />

today Eastern Europe. Of course, this renders the ethnicist, apartheid Basic ‘Law of Return’ to<br />

Israel for all Jews (and for Jews only) arbitrary and even senseless if Jewishness is to be<br />

defined biologically, as well as plain discriminatory. Furthermore, around one million Jews –<br />

and 300,000 others who have become or are in the process of becoming Jews – have<br />

emigrated from the former Soviet Union to Israel. There are still another million Jews in<br />

Russia today, and many Zionists are doing their best to entice them and many others to<br />

immigrate to Israel. 640<br />

The first break-up of the proto-Afroasiatic language – the hypothesized ancestor of the<br />

Semitic languages (including Hebrew and Arabic) as well as of ancient Egyptian, Hausa and<br />

Iraqw (spoken in Nigeria and Tanzania today) and other languages – is commonly assumed to<br />

have taken place no more than 10,000 years ago. The people who spoke this language most<br />

likely resided near or in the northern part of the East African Rift valley. All six or more<br />

branches of the Afroasiatic language family except the Semitic branch are geographically and<br />

historically confined to Africa. Moreover, the Semitic sub-family is also confined to Africa<br />

except for a minority of languages, including Arabic and Hebrew. 12 of the 19 Semitic<br />

languages still spoken today are only spoken in Ethiopia. 641 It therefore makes much sense to<br />

assume that the ancestors of many if not most Jews and Palestinians were all Africans as<br />

recently as 10,000 years ago. 642 At the very same time, however, there was already a fortified<br />

village at Jericho in Palestine, undoubtedly populated by non-Semites. Thus, the Israeli<br />

constitutional claims to Palestine, Cana’an or the area ‘from the river of Egypt<br />

unto…Euphrates’ as primordially Jewish land are rendered even more senseless. The<br />

Palestinians, however, are tied to the land in an unbroken chain at least since long before the<br />

British mandate, not unlike the dispossessed Blacks in Rhodesia. Not only the landowners and<br />

the former landowners among the Palestinians should be counted here, but also those who<br />

belong to the land, and to whom the land belongs in a cultural sense.<br />

Nonetheless, some Jews – and it is practically impossible to say who – do have a kind<br />

of relationship with historical Palestine which is historically deeper than the Whites’ to South<br />

Africa: a difference of degree, however, rather than of kind. A culture, which has for a long<br />

time reiterated the phrase ‘Next year in Jerusalem’, should not be expelled from it, nor be<br />

denied access to the city. However, there is, crucially, nothing in this phrase that implies<br />

statehood for the Jewish people, nor is there anything that prescribes exclusion of others from<br />

Jerusalem. Primarily, the phrase expresses and symbolizes hope for the future as well as<br />

commemorating pain over expulsion. It is also a reference to the Kingdom of Heaven, which<br />

is by definition not a place on earth. If Jews come in peace or live in peace, why should they<br />

640<br />

See Koestler: The Thirteenth Tribe: The Khazar Empire and Its Heritage, 1976, Wexler: The Khazars, The<br />

Writings of Israel Shamir, no date. See also N.N.: Russia’s Putin Meets Jewish Leaders, March 19, 2002 and<br />

footnotes 338-343, above. For the wider problem of biased justification attempts through history and especially<br />

through archaeology, see Fagan: Israel – Archaeology (General Feature): Digging for History or Politics in<br />

Israel? 2000; Said 2003: 45-50. Against the grain of recent, mainly biblically and nationalistically inspired,<br />

Israeli archaeology, Leeman 2004 argues that the origin of the Jewish religion may lie in Western Arabia. On the<br />

intellectual appropriation (and obfuscation) of Historical Palestine, which has retroactively obliterated<br />

Palestinian history or turned it into footnotes of Israeli history, see Whitelam 1996.<br />

641<br />

Diamond 1998 (1997): 383<br />

642<br />

Bernal 1991 (1987): 11f

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!