Apartheid
Apartheid
Apartheid
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
242<br />
9. Thought<br />
The most potent weapon in the hands of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed.<br />
(Steve Biko) 574<br />
Abstract phenomena or concepts – such as ‘culture’, ‘race’, ‘nationality’, ‘ethnicity’<br />
and ‘religion’ – are habitually invoked by apartheid oppressors and their sympathizers as<br />
bastions separated by unbridgeable divides. Nothing could of course be further from the truth,<br />
but the strategic and political function of such reasoning is almost invariably to avoid or to<br />
marginalize the more concrete and material facts of discrimination, i.e. of apartheid violence,<br />
repopulation, citizenship, land, work, access, education and language. Especially when a<br />
violent conflict flares, the underlying apartheid is disguised by the elites responsible for them<br />
as somehow inevitable, and even more importantly as a clash of cultures, or even as a clash of<br />
different human natures. The background information of oppression is conveniently forgotten<br />
and, in many cases, itself repressed.<br />
A clever trick is achieved by sympathy thus being generated for the ‘beleaguered<br />
minority’, the most common reaction to typical western media reports about and from both<br />
apartheid South Africa (at least until the 1970s) and apartheid Israel (until the present). This<br />
card is also played cunningly by the apartheid governments and their allies, e.g. by the US<br />
Secretary of State in October 2000 (see below). And today the mass media do, to a large<br />
extent, govern and control political opinion. Especially when it comes to world affairs, of<br />
which there is even less direct knowledge among the public than of local, national or regional<br />
affairs, public opinion is published opinion.<br />
<strong>Apartheid</strong> thought is therefore neither unimportant nor unessential unto apartheid<br />
itself. It is an exceptionally extremist, elitist kind of thinking, which attempts to justify gross<br />
human rights violations, and even to make them appear as moral duties. And in order for the<br />
entire system of oppression to function, this variety of extremist thought has to become<br />
internalized by each generation of an entire people – the oppressive minority. 575 That is<br />
sufficient. But it usually goes further than that.<br />
<strong>Apartheid</strong> thought also targets the oppressed majority as well as any other minorities<br />
aside from the most privileged one in an apartheid state. Especially the small, indigenous class<br />
that has been selected as the favored allies of the oppressors, are sought out and worked upon.<br />
Although apartheid ideologues never even approached success in convincing an indigenous<br />
majority of its inherent inferiority, they have often proved successful with these favored<br />
groups, and also in severely limiting the self-respect, self-confidence, dignity and dynamism<br />
of the majority, by means of de-humanization and humiliation. That is why it, for example,<br />
became so important for the South African white elites to silence and eventually murder Steve<br />
Biko, the leader of the Black Consciousness Movement (see Chapter II.1.2.).<br />
Finally, apartheid ideology is directed at vital military, political and business partners<br />
abroad. With the indiscriminate way the mass media work, the not so vital partners and the<br />
numerous neutral or powerless parties are of course also subject to the propaganda. But if they<br />
were not so brainwashed, they probably would not be so neutral or powerless, either. I could<br />
have called this section ‘Propaganda’ or ‘Ideology’, but I believe the pervasiveness of<br />
apartheid manifests itself even more in this section than in the previous ones. <strong>Apartheid</strong><br />
thought seems to be something that can only be fully understood by those who suffer or<br />
perpetrate it, but I will attempt to decipher at least some of its essential characteristics in the<br />
chapters that follow.<br />
574 Quoted in Boyle: 27 Years On, S.Africa’s Slain Biko Sets a Standard, 2002. Also quoted by Barsamian in:<br />
Liberating the Mind from Orthodoxies, An Interview with Noam Chomsky, 2001. (The interviewer quotes Biko<br />
and Chomsky agrees with Biko.)<br />
575 See MacCann & Maddy: <strong>Apartheid</strong> and Racism in South African Children’s Literature, 1985-1995, 2001