Apartheid
Apartheid
Apartheid
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
222<br />
7. Education<br />
<strong>Apartheid</strong> education is…a crime against humanity.<br />
(Nelson Mandela) 499<br />
7.1. The Museum, the Gymnasia and the Definition of Writing<br />
Ptolemaic Egypt was very rich, most probably the richest country in the world at the<br />
time. Alexandria, the world’s largest city, boasted the largest library and research institute in<br />
the world, the Museum. The most famous scientists of the era, Euclid, Archimedes,<br />
Eratosthenes and others either lived there or came there to study or to do research. Yet,<br />
science and research in the modern sense were only secondary for the Museum. It was mainly<br />
a philological, and thus to a considerable extent an ideological center. Classic Greek literature,<br />
especially Homer and Hesiod, was the supreme subject of inquiry. The researchers were all<br />
appointed (and if unsatisfactory, dismissed) by the king or queen, and most of them studied<br />
Greek literature, poetry, and mythology. A second group studied astrology (which had been<br />
imported to Egypt by the Greeks from Asia), astronomy, and mathematics (including the<br />
famous Euclid), and the third largest group dealt with applied science, mainly military<br />
technology, but also physical anthropology – including vivisections of the bodies of convicts<br />
provided to the anatomist, Herophilus, from the prisons by royal decree – as well as biology<br />
and geography. There were no students, and no classes or courses were apparently offered at<br />
the Museum itself. 500<br />
All of the researchers that we know of were Greeks, with a single certain exception, an<br />
Egyptian priest called Manetho, from whom we still have a history of Dynastic Egypt with a<br />
list of all the dynasties, kings and queens in Egyptian history since the early third millennium<br />
BCE. It is in fact the most important single tool for our current understanding of the history of<br />
ancient Egypt.<br />
Manetho was active during the reign of the first three Macedonian kings of Egypt,<br />
Ptolemy I, II and III, and he seems to have been employed for the sole purpose of getting the<br />
Greeks acquainted with a necessary minimum of Egyptian culture. He even wrote his history<br />
of Egypt in Greek, and we only know his Greek name, not his original Egyptian one. Manetho<br />
is the last ancient Egyptian to have written a history of Egypt of which we still have fragments<br />
and reports. We do know of over fifty other ancient historians of Egypt, almost all of whom<br />
had Greek names and were Greek scholars. Their contributions have influenced the<br />
appreciation of Egypt and its dynastic history deeply. As a historian, Manetho has had a hard<br />
time gaining posthumous acceptance until now. Although present-day egyptology gives<br />
Manetho right in many of his scholarly disputes with famed Greek historians such as<br />
Herodotus, the 9 th century monk George Syncellus, for example, ‘vilified Manetho for<br />
presenting Egyptian history from a native Egyptian stance…’ This is just one example of<br />
many, opposed by Manetho’s reasonable chronology of over 3,000 years of almost<br />
uninterrupted indigenous Egyptian rule prior to Alexander’s conquest. This timeframe,<br />
however, burst the extremely narrow chronology of the Bible’s Genesis, which dates its<br />
account of a divine creation of the world as a more recent event than the first Egyptian king in<br />
499 See footnote 524.<br />
500 Clauss 2003: 95-110; Järv: Biblioteket i Alexandria, 1997: 86. In Roman times, however, there were probably<br />
classes held in auditoria near the library, as some recent finds seem to suggest. The auditoria might even have<br />
been in use under Greek rule already. See N.N.: Ancient University Classrooms Found in Alexandria, May 27,<br />
2004. Following Fraser 1972: 348, Clauss writes that Herophilus’ anatomical discoveries would have been the<br />
greatest product of Alexandria had they not been lost until recently (106). Some of his findings were in fact not<br />
paralleled until the late 19 th century CE. Perhaps it is worth considering whether World War II’s Nazi or<br />
Japanese anatomical experiments on live subjects were carried out or foreshadowed here, as well. The racisminduced<br />
lowering of thresholds of inhibition necessary for carrying ut such experiments may indeed have been<br />
present in Ptolemaic Alexandria.