Apartheid

Apartheid Apartheid

media.manila.at
from media.manila.at More from this publisher
21.07.2013 Views

214 Moreover, it often bred a lavish and parasitic way of life as well as a bitterness that was often taken out on their own employees. White women were excluded from most types of formal employment except secretarial and clerical work. While this exclusion was not legislated, many White women were denied access to employment by conservative ideas within Afrikaans and English communities about women’s place in society. Thus, White women’s employment patterns mirrored their role in the family. Furthermore, White women’s aspirations and opportunities were limited by the policies of banks that would not let married women take out loans or open accounts without the permission of their husbands; employers who fired women when they got pregnant; and an educational system that encouraged women to take courses in nursing or teaching rather than dentistry or higher education. This varied depending on class, and began to shift towards the 1980s as university enrolment evened out for White women and men, and as career opportunities began to open up in a number of non-traditional disciplines. However, broadly speaking, White women are still economically and politically disadvantaged in relation to White men... Black women participated in the workforce in significantly higher numbers than White women did. The most common employment of Black women was in the domestic sphere. Black female domestic workers subsidised the life-styles of White women under extremely exploitative conditions. 474 Not only is sexism a divide-and-rule strategy in apartheid societies. Racism is a divideand-rule strategy in patriarchal societies, as well. 6.3. Pass Laws, Closures, Bypass Roads, Water Theft and the Apartheid Wall On June 16, 2002, one day short of the 26 th anniversary of the beginning of the Soweto massacre, Israel ‘inaugurated’ work on a ‘security fence’ along its border with the occupied West Bank. The ‘fence’, which also includes systems of trenches, razor wire and electronic early warning and surveillance devices, is officially being erected in order to stop Palestinian suicide bombers from infiltrating Israel. The ‘fence’ – along vast stretches in fact a wall, three times as long as the Berlin Wall and twice as high – is largely being built on Palestinian land, at some stages going at least six kilometers into Palestinian territory. When finished, it will lead to Israel’s annexing approximately 10% of the West Bank, 57 Israeli settlements illegally built on seized Palestinian lands, 303,000 Israeli settlers and almost 290,000 Palestinians. It will cost US$ 220 million to build. It already stretched over 110 km in its first phase, which was finished in a year. A second phase of a 50 km long system of fences and barriers around Jerusalem was begun on June 30, 2002. By November 2003, due to the fence, 70,000 Palestinians had already become separated from markets, fields, schools, hospitals and other public services in the West Bank, where they still hoped to be allowed a Palestinian state by Israel and the USA. 65,000 Palestinian-owned olive trees had been uprooted by the Israeli occupiers to make way for the wall at this point. This fact and the restrictions on access to the fields led to estimates that the 2003 olive harvest, of immense importance to the crumbling Palestinian economy, would be halved due to the wall alone. The Israeli Defense Ministry said that 50 claims for losses had been made by this time, and that compensation had been granted for each one. Israel built 29 gates, through which Palestinians would sometimes be allowed to pass, along the first 150 km of the wall, but the gates are open only for brief 474 Msimang, Sisonke: Affirmative Action in the New South Africa: The Politics of Representation, Law and Equity, 2000

215 periods at varying times and are sometimes shut for days, officially due to ‘security reasons’. The entire length of the ‘fence’ was expected to be 680 km. The practical outcome of the wall, frequently referred to as Israel’s ‘Berlin Wall’ or ‘Apartheid Wall’, was cynically enforced ethnic segregation and discrimination, the main reasons behind the suicide attacks. For example, in the Palestinian village of Rumani, up to 90 per cent of male Palestinian workers found work in Israel before the apartheid wall, around half of them by slipping over the border illegally. On the whole, unemployment in the West Bank at this time was an estimated 60 per cent, and it was expected to rise sharply again due to the wall, according to the Ramallahbased UNSCO, the United Nations Special Coordinating Organization. An estimated 300,000 workers from Romania, Thailand, the Philippines, Turkey, China and other countries had replaced Palestinians for jobs in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories at this stage. 475 The Special Rapporteur for the UN Commission on Human Rights referred to the ‘security fence’ as a ‘creeping annexation’ of Palestinian territory and as ‘illegal’. The International Committee of the Red Cross said it violates international humanitarian law. Even the USA has criticized Israel for cutting off Palestinian farmers from their land with the wall. Yet when the international community, represented by the UN General Assembly, voted to refer the case of the illegality of the wall to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the USA (along with seven other nations) voted against the motion. The ICJ was already widely seen as likely to confirm the illegality of the wall. But Israel, the USA and the EU filed briefs with the ICJ trying to argue that it is not the ‘proper’ forum to decide the issue. (Non-existent peace negotiations between the Israelis and the Palestinians, with US ‘mediation’, were supposed to provide a better chance of solving the ‘dispute’. Interestingly, an opinion poll had recently revealed that EU citizens considered Israel and the USA the two biggest threats to world peace, so there is no doubt that the EU officials did not represent the will of the EU electorate in this case.) In a reaction to the UN vote, Israel, as usual, even accused the international community of ‘hypocrisy’, but Israel’s justice minister, Yosef Lapid, in turn accused the prime minister, Sharon, of seizing too much Palestinian land, of drawing US criticism and of stirring world opinion against Israel. The human rights group, Amnesty International, said of the wall that Palestinian communities are being split up intentionally and that Israeli restrictions on the movement of Palestinian people and goods have now reached an ‘unprecedented level’. According to Amnesty International, the ‘security barrier’ along with ‘[c]losures, blockades, checkpoints, roadblocks, curfews and other restrictions have..a disastrous impact on the lives of Palestinians’, and this amounts to collective punishment, which is a crime against humanity. 476 Along with its awful physical aspects, the barrier also has a disturbing symbolic character. Like the forts and fortified homesteads and ranches in the mythology of the Hollywood ‘Westerns’, the Israeli ‘security barrier’ inverts the relationship between the invaders and the invaded: Israel, the real invader, appears to be defending itself against illegitimate invasions. Israel’s Apartheid Wall is similar to the Berlin Wall, but it is designed to keep people locked out (the vast majority of Palestinians), as opposed to the Berlin Wall, which was built 475 Spetalnick: Israel Inaugurates West Bank Fence Project, 2002; Hauser: Palestinian Town Dreads Israel’s “Berlin Wall”, 2002; Robinson, A.: Israel’s Fence May Be Final Palestinian Economy Blow, 2002; N.N.: Israeli Security Cabinet Sets West Bank Fence Line, August 14, 2002; N.N.: LAW Files More Petitions against Israel’s Apartheid Wall, September 11, 2002; N.N.: 11,000 Palestinians Between Israel’s Apartheid Wall and Green Line, September 25, 2002; Apartheid Wall Saga Continues, October 15, 2002; Levy: Apartheid Wall, 2003; Heinrich: Israeli Barrier Cuts into Palestinian Olive Harvest, 2003; Amr, W.: Israeli Barrier Drives Palestinian Traders to Despair, 2004. A non-governmental organization called ‘Palestinian Grassroots Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign’ was formed soon after the wall started being erected. The website is www.StoptheWall.org. 476 N.N.: Israeli Security Fence Illegal-U.N. Investigator, March 27, 2003; Evans, R.: Israel Barrier Violates Humanitarian Law-Red Cross, 2004; Heller, C.: Amnesty Condemns Israel’s W. Bank Security Barrier, 2003; Goldin: Israel Attacks U.N. over West Bank Barrier Vote, 2003; N.N.: Factbox: Israel’s West Bank Barrier on Trial, February 9, 2004. See footnote 715 below on the EU opinion poll.

215<br />

periods at varying times and are sometimes shut for days, officially due to ‘security reasons’.<br />

The entire length of the ‘fence’ was expected to be 680 km. The practical outcome of the wall,<br />

frequently referred to as Israel’s ‘Berlin Wall’ or ‘<strong>Apartheid</strong> Wall’, was cynically enforced<br />

ethnic segregation and discrimination, the main reasons behind the suicide attacks. For<br />

example, in the Palestinian village of Rumani, up to 90 per cent of male Palestinian workers<br />

found work in Israel before the apartheid wall, around half of them by slipping over the border<br />

illegally. On the whole, unemployment in the West Bank at this time was an estimated 60 per<br />

cent, and it was expected to rise sharply again due to the wall, according to the Ramallahbased<br />

UNSCO, the United Nations Special Coordinating Organization. An estimated 300,000<br />

workers from Romania, Thailand, the Philippines, Turkey, China and other countries had<br />

replaced Palestinians for jobs in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories at this stage. 475<br />

The Special Rapporteur for the UN Commission on Human Rights referred to the<br />

‘security fence’ as a ‘creeping annexation’ of Palestinian territory and as ‘illegal’. The<br />

International Committee of the Red Cross said it violates international humanitarian law. Even<br />

the USA has criticized Israel for cutting off Palestinian farmers from their land with the wall.<br />

Yet when the international community, represented by the UN General Assembly, voted to<br />

refer the case of the illegality of the wall to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the USA<br />

(along with seven other nations) voted against the motion. The ICJ was already widely seen as<br />

likely to confirm the illegality of the wall. But Israel, the USA and the EU filed briefs with the<br />

ICJ trying to argue that it is not the ‘proper’ forum to decide the issue. (Non-existent peace<br />

negotiations between the Israelis and the Palestinians, with US ‘mediation’, were supposed to<br />

provide a better chance of solving the ‘dispute’. Interestingly, an opinion poll had recently<br />

revealed that EU citizens considered Israel and the USA the two biggest threats to world<br />

peace, so there is no doubt that the EU officials did not represent the will of the EU electorate<br />

in this case.) In a reaction to the UN vote, Israel, as usual, even accused the international<br />

community of ‘hypocrisy’, but Israel’s justice minister, Yosef Lapid, in turn accused the<br />

prime minister, Sharon, of seizing too much Palestinian land, of drawing US criticism and of<br />

stirring world opinion against Israel. The human rights group, Amnesty International, said of<br />

the wall that Palestinian communities are being split up intentionally and that Israeli<br />

restrictions on the movement of Palestinian people and goods have now reached an<br />

‘unprecedented level’. According to Amnesty International, the ‘security barrier’ along with<br />

‘[c]losures, blockades, checkpoints, roadblocks, curfews and other restrictions have..a<br />

disastrous impact on the lives of Palestinians’, and this amounts to collective punishment,<br />

which is a crime against humanity. 476<br />

Along with its awful physical aspects, the barrier also has a disturbing symbolic<br />

character. Like the forts and fortified homesteads and ranches in the mythology of the<br />

Hollywood ‘Westerns’, the Israeli ‘security barrier’ inverts the relationship between the<br />

invaders and the invaded: Israel, the real invader, appears to be defending itself against<br />

illegitimate invasions.<br />

Israel’s <strong>Apartheid</strong> Wall is similar to the Berlin Wall, but it is designed to keep people<br />

locked out (the vast majority of Palestinians), as opposed to the Berlin Wall, which was built<br />

475 Spetalnick: Israel Inaugurates West Bank Fence Project, 2002; Hauser: Palestinian Town Dreads Israel’s<br />

“Berlin Wall”, 2002; Robinson, A.: Israel’s Fence May Be Final Palestinian Economy Blow, 2002; N.N.: Israeli<br />

Security Cabinet Sets West Bank Fence Line, August 14, 2002; N.N.: LAW Files More Petitions against Israel’s<br />

<strong>Apartheid</strong> Wall, September 11, 2002; N.N.: 11,000 Palestinians Between Israel’s <strong>Apartheid</strong> Wall and Green<br />

Line, September 25, 2002; <strong>Apartheid</strong> Wall Saga Continues, October 15, 2002; Levy: <strong>Apartheid</strong> Wall, 2003;<br />

Heinrich: Israeli Barrier Cuts into Palestinian Olive Harvest, 2003; Amr, W.: Israeli Barrier Drives Palestinian<br />

Traders to Despair, 2004. A non-governmental organization called ‘Palestinian Grassroots Anti-<strong>Apartheid</strong> Wall<br />

Campaign’ was formed soon after the wall started being erected. The website is www.StoptheWall.org.<br />

476 N.N.: Israeli Security Fence Illegal-U.N. Investigator, March 27, 2003; Evans, R.: Israel Barrier Violates<br />

Humanitarian Law-Red Cross, 2004; Heller, C.: Amnesty Condemns Israel’s W. Bank Security Barrier, 2003;<br />

Goldin: Israel Attacks U.N. over West Bank Barrier Vote, 2003; N.N.: Factbox: Israel’s West Bank Barrier on<br />

Trial, February 9, 2004. See footnote 715 below on the EU opinion poll.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!