Apartheid
Apartheid Apartheid
214 Moreover, it often bred a lavish and parasitic way of life as well as a bitterness that was often taken out on their own employees. White women were excluded from most types of formal employment except secretarial and clerical work. While this exclusion was not legislated, many White women were denied access to employment by conservative ideas within Afrikaans and English communities about women’s place in society. Thus, White women’s employment patterns mirrored their role in the family. Furthermore, White women’s aspirations and opportunities were limited by the policies of banks that would not let married women take out loans or open accounts without the permission of their husbands; employers who fired women when they got pregnant; and an educational system that encouraged women to take courses in nursing or teaching rather than dentistry or higher education. This varied depending on class, and began to shift towards the 1980s as university enrolment evened out for White women and men, and as career opportunities began to open up in a number of non-traditional disciplines. However, broadly speaking, White women are still economically and politically disadvantaged in relation to White men... Black women participated in the workforce in significantly higher numbers than White women did. The most common employment of Black women was in the domestic sphere. Black female domestic workers subsidised the life-styles of White women under extremely exploitative conditions. 474 Not only is sexism a divide-and-rule strategy in apartheid societies. Racism is a divideand-rule strategy in patriarchal societies, as well. 6.3. Pass Laws, Closures, Bypass Roads, Water Theft and the Apartheid Wall On June 16, 2002, one day short of the 26 th anniversary of the beginning of the Soweto massacre, Israel ‘inaugurated’ work on a ‘security fence’ along its border with the occupied West Bank. The ‘fence’, which also includes systems of trenches, razor wire and electronic early warning and surveillance devices, is officially being erected in order to stop Palestinian suicide bombers from infiltrating Israel. The ‘fence’ – along vast stretches in fact a wall, three times as long as the Berlin Wall and twice as high – is largely being built on Palestinian land, at some stages going at least six kilometers into Palestinian territory. When finished, it will lead to Israel’s annexing approximately 10% of the West Bank, 57 Israeli settlements illegally built on seized Palestinian lands, 303,000 Israeli settlers and almost 290,000 Palestinians. It will cost US$ 220 million to build. It already stretched over 110 km in its first phase, which was finished in a year. A second phase of a 50 km long system of fences and barriers around Jerusalem was begun on June 30, 2002. By November 2003, due to the fence, 70,000 Palestinians had already become separated from markets, fields, schools, hospitals and other public services in the West Bank, where they still hoped to be allowed a Palestinian state by Israel and the USA. 65,000 Palestinian-owned olive trees had been uprooted by the Israeli occupiers to make way for the wall at this point. This fact and the restrictions on access to the fields led to estimates that the 2003 olive harvest, of immense importance to the crumbling Palestinian economy, would be halved due to the wall alone. The Israeli Defense Ministry said that 50 claims for losses had been made by this time, and that compensation had been granted for each one. Israel built 29 gates, through which Palestinians would sometimes be allowed to pass, along the first 150 km of the wall, but the gates are open only for brief 474 Msimang, Sisonke: Affirmative Action in the New South Africa: The Politics of Representation, Law and Equity, 2000
215 periods at varying times and are sometimes shut for days, officially due to ‘security reasons’. The entire length of the ‘fence’ was expected to be 680 km. The practical outcome of the wall, frequently referred to as Israel’s ‘Berlin Wall’ or ‘Apartheid Wall’, was cynically enforced ethnic segregation and discrimination, the main reasons behind the suicide attacks. For example, in the Palestinian village of Rumani, up to 90 per cent of male Palestinian workers found work in Israel before the apartheid wall, around half of them by slipping over the border illegally. On the whole, unemployment in the West Bank at this time was an estimated 60 per cent, and it was expected to rise sharply again due to the wall, according to the Ramallahbased UNSCO, the United Nations Special Coordinating Organization. An estimated 300,000 workers from Romania, Thailand, the Philippines, Turkey, China and other countries had replaced Palestinians for jobs in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories at this stage. 475 The Special Rapporteur for the UN Commission on Human Rights referred to the ‘security fence’ as a ‘creeping annexation’ of Palestinian territory and as ‘illegal’. The International Committee of the Red Cross said it violates international humanitarian law. Even the USA has criticized Israel for cutting off Palestinian farmers from their land with the wall. Yet when the international community, represented by the UN General Assembly, voted to refer the case of the illegality of the wall to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the USA (along with seven other nations) voted against the motion. The ICJ was already widely seen as likely to confirm the illegality of the wall. But Israel, the USA and the EU filed briefs with the ICJ trying to argue that it is not the ‘proper’ forum to decide the issue. (Non-existent peace negotiations between the Israelis and the Palestinians, with US ‘mediation’, were supposed to provide a better chance of solving the ‘dispute’. Interestingly, an opinion poll had recently revealed that EU citizens considered Israel and the USA the two biggest threats to world peace, so there is no doubt that the EU officials did not represent the will of the EU electorate in this case.) In a reaction to the UN vote, Israel, as usual, even accused the international community of ‘hypocrisy’, but Israel’s justice minister, Yosef Lapid, in turn accused the prime minister, Sharon, of seizing too much Palestinian land, of drawing US criticism and of stirring world opinion against Israel. The human rights group, Amnesty International, said of the wall that Palestinian communities are being split up intentionally and that Israeli restrictions on the movement of Palestinian people and goods have now reached an ‘unprecedented level’. According to Amnesty International, the ‘security barrier’ along with ‘[c]losures, blockades, checkpoints, roadblocks, curfews and other restrictions have..a disastrous impact on the lives of Palestinians’, and this amounts to collective punishment, which is a crime against humanity. 476 Along with its awful physical aspects, the barrier also has a disturbing symbolic character. Like the forts and fortified homesteads and ranches in the mythology of the Hollywood ‘Westerns’, the Israeli ‘security barrier’ inverts the relationship between the invaders and the invaded: Israel, the real invader, appears to be defending itself against illegitimate invasions. Israel’s Apartheid Wall is similar to the Berlin Wall, but it is designed to keep people locked out (the vast majority of Palestinians), as opposed to the Berlin Wall, which was built 475 Spetalnick: Israel Inaugurates West Bank Fence Project, 2002; Hauser: Palestinian Town Dreads Israel’s “Berlin Wall”, 2002; Robinson, A.: Israel’s Fence May Be Final Palestinian Economy Blow, 2002; N.N.: Israeli Security Cabinet Sets West Bank Fence Line, August 14, 2002; N.N.: LAW Files More Petitions against Israel’s Apartheid Wall, September 11, 2002; N.N.: 11,000 Palestinians Between Israel’s Apartheid Wall and Green Line, September 25, 2002; Apartheid Wall Saga Continues, October 15, 2002; Levy: Apartheid Wall, 2003; Heinrich: Israeli Barrier Cuts into Palestinian Olive Harvest, 2003; Amr, W.: Israeli Barrier Drives Palestinian Traders to Despair, 2004. A non-governmental organization called ‘Palestinian Grassroots Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign’ was formed soon after the wall started being erected. The website is www.StoptheWall.org. 476 N.N.: Israeli Security Fence Illegal-U.N. Investigator, March 27, 2003; Evans, R.: Israel Barrier Violates Humanitarian Law-Red Cross, 2004; Heller, C.: Amnesty Condemns Israel’s W. Bank Security Barrier, 2003; Goldin: Israel Attacks U.N. over West Bank Barrier Vote, 2003; N.N.: Factbox: Israel’s West Bank Barrier on Trial, February 9, 2004. See footnote 715 below on the EU opinion poll.
- Page 163 and 164: 163 were quite obviously not to be
- Page 165 and 166: 165 Moreover, as we shall see in Ch
- Page 167 and 168: talent and principle this must incl
- Page 169 and 170: colonies within and around the city
- Page 171 and 172: 171 In the following year, the Isra
- Page 173 and 174: 173 employees by Israeli employers
- Page 175 and 176: 3. Citizenship 175 This is where th
- Page 177 and 178: 177 entailed by this system of citi
- Page 179 and 180: 179 whatsoever. Like the women in A
- Page 181 and 182: 181 KwaZulu comprised twenty-nine m
- Page 183 and 184: 183 Just as the Basic ‘Law of Ret
- Page 185 and 186: 185 health care and other rights, s
- Page 187 and 188: 4. Land 187 Land dispossession and
- Page 189 and 190: 189 separate quarters for Greeks of
- Page 191 and 192: 191 towns under the condition that
- Page 193 and 194: 193 settlements were being built th
- Page 195 and 196: 195 because when given self-rule in
- Page 197 and 198: order to enjoy elementary rights. W
- Page 199 and 200: 199 5.1. Tax unto Starvation Ptolem
- Page 201 and 202: 201 keeping such a brutal industry
- Page 203 and 204: 203 and often extremely unhealthy w
- Page 205 and 206: 205 In most cases, these passes are
- Page 207 and 208: 207 corporate giants. Here we have
- Page 209 and 210: 209 As elsewhere in the developing
- Page 211 and 212: 211 in and by itself apartheid in t
- Page 213: 213 near-psychotic state of mind of
- Page 217 and 218: 217 overcrowded. For example, Ramal
- Page 219 and 220: 219 that in the Palestinian territo
- Page 221 and 222: 221 Third World citizens or worse:
- Page 223 and 224: 223 Manetho’s account. 501 From M
- Page 225 and 226: From the second and third centuries
- Page 227 and 228: education is inferior and a crime a
- Page 229 and 230: 229 on the other hand, aid from the
- Page 231 and 232: 8. Language Who is to say that robb
- Page 233 and 234: 233 case in the Americas during the
- Page 235 and 236: therefore throws into high profile
- Page 237 and 238: 237 Today, there are still many tow
- Page 239 and 240: 239 Learning Hebrew, on the other h
- Page 241 and 242: 241 be overemphasized. The South Af
- Page 243 and 244: 243 It might seem vastly exaggerate
- Page 245 and 246: 245 and it continued throughout the
- Page 247 and 248: 247 A prime example of the classica
- Page 249 and 250: 249 greedy, cunning, unreliable and
- Page 251 and 252: 251 behind nuclear physics being su
- Page 253 and 254: 253 argued, already in the sixth ce
- Page 255 and 256: 255 at the end of the 19 th century
- Page 257 and 258: Inevitably, these racist stereotype
- Page 259 and 260: 259 edge of the sword’ (ibid: 6:2
- Page 261 and 262: 261 be denied access to or be expel
- Page 263 and 264: 263 ‘unified’ their countries d
215<br />
periods at varying times and are sometimes shut for days, officially due to ‘security reasons’.<br />
The entire length of the ‘fence’ was expected to be 680 km. The practical outcome of the wall,<br />
frequently referred to as Israel’s ‘Berlin Wall’ or ‘<strong>Apartheid</strong> Wall’, was cynically enforced<br />
ethnic segregation and discrimination, the main reasons behind the suicide attacks. For<br />
example, in the Palestinian village of Rumani, up to 90 per cent of male Palestinian workers<br />
found work in Israel before the apartheid wall, around half of them by slipping over the border<br />
illegally. On the whole, unemployment in the West Bank at this time was an estimated 60 per<br />
cent, and it was expected to rise sharply again due to the wall, according to the Ramallahbased<br />
UNSCO, the United Nations Special Coordinating Organization. An estimated 300,000<br />
workers from Romania, Thailand, the Philippines, Turkey, China and other countries had<br />
replaced Palestinians for jobs in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories at this stage. 475<br />
The Special Rapporteur for the UN Commission on Human Rights referred to the<br />
‘security fence’ as a ‘creeping annexation’ of Palestinian territory and as ‘illegal’. The<br />
International Committee of the Red Cross said it violates international humanitarian law. Even<br />
the USA has criticized Israel for cutting off Palestinian farmers from their land with the wall.<br />
Yet when the international community, represented by the UN General Assembly, voted to<br />
refer the case of the illegality of the wall to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the USA<br />
(along with seven other nations) voted against the motion. The ICJ was already widely seen as<br />
likely to confirm the illegality of the wall. But Israel, the USA and the EU filed briefs with the<br />
ICJ trying to argue that it is not the ‘proper’ forum to decide the issue. (Non-existent peace<br />
negotiations between the Israelis and the Palestinians, with US ‘mediation’, were supposed to<br />
provide a better chance of solving the ‘dispute’. Interestingly, an opinion poll had recently<br />
revealed that EU citizens considered Israel and the USA the two biggest threats to world<br />
peace, so there is no doubt that the EU officials did not represent the will of the EU electorate<br />
in this case.) In a reaction to the UN vote, Israel, as usual, even accused the international<br />
community of ‘hypocrisy’, but Israel’s justice minister, Yosef Lapid, in turn accused the<br />
prime minister, Sharon, of seizing too much Palestinian land, of drawing US criticism and of<br />
stirring world opinion against Israel. The human rights group, Amnesty International, said of<br />
the wall that Palestinian communities are being split up intentionally and that Israeli<br />
restrictions on the movement of Palestinian people and goods have now reached an<br />
‘unprecedented level’. According to Amnesty International, the ‘security barrier’ along with<br />
‘[c]losures, blockades, checkpoints, roadblocks, curfews and other restrictions have..a<br />
disastrous impact on the lives of Palestinians’, and this amounts to collective punishment,<br />
which is a crime against humanity. 476<br />
Along with its awful physical aspects, the barrier also has a disturbing symbolic<br />
character. Like the forts and fortified homesteads and ranches in the mythology of the<br />
Hollywood ‘Westerns’, the Israeli ‘security barrier’ inverts the relationship between the<br />
invaders and the invaded: Israel, the real invader, appears to be defending itself against<br />
illegitimate invasions.<br />
Israel’s <strong>Apartheid</strong> Wall is similar to the Berlin Wall, but it is designed to keep people<br />
locked out (the vast majority of Palestinians), as opposed to the Berlin Wall, which was built<br />
475 Spetalnick: Israel Inaugurates West Bank Fence Project, 2002; Hauser: Palestinian Town Dreads Israel’s<br />
“Berlin Wall”, 2002; Robinson, A.: Israel’s Fence May Be Final Palestinian Economy Blow, 2002; N.N.: Israeli<br />
Security Cabinet Sets West Bank Fence Line, August 14, 2002; N.N.: LAW Files More Petitions against Israel’s<br />
<strong>Apartheid</strong> Wall, September 11, 2002; N.N.: 11,000 Palestinians Between Israel’s <strong>Apartheid</strong> Wall and Green<br />
Line, September 25, 2002; <strong>Apartheid</strong> Wall Saga Continues, October 15, 2002; Levy: <strong>Apartheid</strong> Wall, 2003;<br />
Heinrich: Israeli Barrier Cuts into Palestinian Olive Harvest, 2003; Amr, W.: Israeli Barrier Drives Palestinian<br />
Traders to Despair, 2004. A non-governmental organization called ‘Palestinian Grassroots Anti-<strong>Apartheid</strong> Wall<br />
Campaign’ was formed soon after the wall started being erected. The website is www.StoptheWall.org.<br />
476 N.N.: Israeli Security Fence Illegal-U.N. Investigator, March 27, 2003; Evans, R.: Israel Barrier Violates<br />
Humanitarian Law-Red Cross, 2004; Heller, C.: Amnesty Condemns Israel’s W. Bank Security Barrier, 2003;<br />
Goldin: Israel Attacks U.N. over West Bank Barrier Vote, 2003; N.N.: Factbox: Israel’s West Bank Barrier on<br />
Trial, February 9, 2004. See footnote 715 below on the EU opinion poll.