21.07.2013 Views

Apartheid

Apartheid

Apartheid

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

207<br />

corporate giants. Here we have a third form of it. The oppressors are indigenous, in relative<br />

terms, the victims are foreign ‘guest’ workers. An interesting feature appears at this point. The<br />

foreign workers are often being paid even less than the Palestinians are, or rather, than the<br />

Palestinians were, since Israelis hardly employ Palestinians any longer. This probably never<br />

happened on such a large scale before in an apartheid society: an imported work force is being<br />

paid less than the indigenous, in relative terms, and they are often being mistreated worse in<br />

other ways, too. Or are they? One could well argue that Palestinians, who are not getting jobs<br />

at all, are treated worse in a more general sense. And then we have the Israeli violence. Being<br />

beaten is bad enough, but being bombed or taken out by army snipers targeting civilians is<br />

worse. A neo-apartheid phenomenon thus exists in Israel, but it is not (yet) as severe as<br />

apartheid, not even close to it, in fact. Moreover, Palestinian labor is probably still cheaper for<br />

Israel than the imported work force is, in general economic terms. Although the latter are paid<br />

less, they first have to be imported, then acclimatized in both natural and cultural senses, for<br />

instance by being taught the language. Of course, it is impossible to confidently estimate such<br />

costs, but it certainly seems as if the Israeli decisions not to hire Palestinian workers are<br />

political (ethnicist) rather than economic.<br />

Palestinians in the Occupied Territories are not only isolated from Israel but from each<br />

other as well. Palestinian trade is severely limited between the different autonomous areas<br />

such as between Gaza and the West Bank, mainly due to pass limitations and the lack of direct<br />

routes to the destinations (of Palestinian goods deliveries). A UN report, released in 2003, said<br />

curfews were imposed on towns in the West Bank by the Israeli army 70 per cent of the time<br />

in the second half of 2002, halting about 75 per cent of domestic production. Defining poverty<br />

as living on less than $2 a day, the World Bank, in a companion report, said 21 per cent of<br />

Palestinians were poor when the Intifada broke out in September 2000, and the figure reached<br />

60 per cent in December 2002. The Israelis, of course, say that the Palestinians only have<br />

themselves to blame for this situation, by continuing to engage in violent activities. The<br />

Palestinians, on the other hand, say they did not start the violence and blame Israel for<br />

engaging in illegal, collective punishment. 462<br />

Palestinians with Israeli citizenship are also victims of severe discrimination. In almost<br />

every ministry and state company, the percentage of Palestinians hired is much lower than the<br />

percentage of Palestinians in the work force. Out of the 540 jobs in the Ministry of Trade and<br />

Industry, for example, only four have been given to Palestinian citizens of Israel, who make<br />

up 20 per cent of the work force. And then, out of the state money allocated to the ministry,<br />

only half a per cent goes to projects benefitting Palestinian citizens of Israel. 463<br />

Another example: Public institutions and many private companies make army service<br />

a condition of employment. Of course, this is not unheard-of in countries with compulsory<br />

military service. But Arabs, except for the Bedouin and the Druze Arabs, who are tiny<br />

minorities, are the only ethnicity barred from military service in Israel. Thus, nearly all Arabs<br />

are unable to fulfil a crucial condition of employment, simply because they are by law not<br />

allowed to do so.<br />

To stop this condition of employment was one of nine concrete steps demanded in<br />

2001 by the International Federation of Human Rights Leagues (FIDH) in order to end<br />

discrimination against Arabs in Israel. The other steps demanded by the FIDH included<br />

instituting a constitutional ban on discrimination, removing any reference to ethnicity on<br />

Israeli identity cards, allowing Arab political parties that do not ‘support the Jewish character<br />

of Israel’ to contest elections and extending Arab access to public funds and property rights.<br />

The FIDH said that Israel violates its international obligations by continuing discrimination<br />

and repression of its Arab citizens. 464<br />

462<br />

Heinrich: Conflict Throttling Palestinian Economy-World Bank, 2003<br />

463 2<br />

Bishara, M. 2002 (2001): 52<br />

464<br />

N.N.: Paris-Based Group Slams Israel on Arab Rights, July 4, 2001

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!