21.07.2013 Views

Apartheid

Apartheid

Apartheid

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

189<br />

separate quarters for Greeks of different origins. The impoverished Egyptian quarter of<br />

Rhakotis was situated at the south-western end of the city, not unlike Soweto – an<br />

abbreviation for South West Township – in, or rather outside Johannesburg, a perversely<br />

populated city with one million inhabitants and three million in its main black suburb.<br />

Rhakotis was also the part of the city that was farthest away from the coast, i.e. from the<br />

center of commerce and trade, the harbor. In this regard, as in so many others, it is like the<br />

Black and Colored townships of Cape Town or the poor Black and Latino quarters of the large<br />

coastal cities in another country with oppressive ethnicist segregation, i.e. New York (Harlem<br />

and the Bronx), Chicago (South Side) and Los Angeles (East LA and South Central). They are<br />

all safely away from the coast. The widest street in Alexandria, 14 meters wide, separated the<br />

ethnic communities as a demarcation line, similar to the current ‘<strong>Apartheid</strong> Wall’ in Jerusalem<br />

(see Chapter II.6.3, below). The Egyptians in the southwest were kept at a maximum distance<br />

from the royal palace and from the rest of the Greeks in the northeast. And they were kept<br />

separated from the Jews, who lived in the east of the city. 390<br />

Just as in apartheid South Africa, or in the Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories, the<br />

rural population in apartheid Egypt was driven to find work in the cities. When the tax burden<br />

became unbearable, the peasants would try their luck there. However, Ptolemy VI introduced<br />

a measure that would become a notorious, and indeed a hated symbol of apartheid in South<br />

Africa, two millennia later. Peasants were only allowed into cities for 20 days. If they became<br />

involved in a court case during their stay in the city, Ptolemy decreed, the case would have to<br />

be concluded within five days. Moreover, judges were to oversee and further limit and<br />

regulate urbanization by administrative means, so that a sufficient number of peasants stayed<br />

in the countryside to work the land. 391<br />

Throughout the period and throughout the land, soldiers also seem to have been a<br />

constant nuisance to the indigenous. Aside from their main function in rural areas as a kind of<br />

feudal lord, they would simply confiscate and rearrange a house or parts of it whenever they<br />

saw fit and usually did not bother to reinstate its original arrangement once they were ready to<br />

leave, if they ever did leave. No form of compensation was ever paid to the Egyptians who<br />

suffered from this practice, which would sometimes also involve acts of physical violence<br />

against the original inhabitants.<br />

None of this was due to lawlessness but to a decree granting the soldiers these extreme<br />

freedoms. The law was introduced by one of the first two Ptolemies, who felt insecure about<br />

relying militarily on short-term contract mercenaries, as all rulers of Egypt – indigenous or not<br />

– had done since the 9 th century BCE. With this new decree, however, there would be many<br />

soldiers who stayed in service longer, and the amount of soldiers who stayed for good also<br />

increased. In addition, as the profession increasingly became hereditary, the mercenaries<br />

would gradually turn into a caste of aristocrats and landlords, largely loyal to the royals. 392<br />

390 Haas 1997: 2, 49, 165; Clauss 2003: 25. Alston states that during Roman times ‘...there is no evidence to<br />

suggest any notable division of areas between ethnic groups.’ Alston 2002: 153. His only positive example of<br />

mixing, however, is in a residential area which ‘appears’ to have been shared by Greeks and Egyptian priests<br />

(ibid.), who, as we know, made up the only privileged indigenous group under Greek and Roman rule. It can<br />

hardly be said to be a good argument for his hypothesis. Moreover, Alston almost contradicts himself by later<br />

stating that ‘There is some reason to believe that there was a measure of ethnic segregation in the cities of<br />

Roman Egypt.’ He then, however, dismisses it as a survival from Ptolemaic times, which only further begs the<br />

question (ibid: 172). In 262 CE, during a nearly full-blown civil war between the Egyptian south of Alexandria<br />

and the Greek north, the main street was referred to as more difficult to cross than the Sinai desert (Clauss 2003:<br />

209f.) On oppressive, ethnicist, residential segregation in US cities and an apparently unheeded warning of the<br />

subsequent LA riots, see Hamilton: <strong>Apartheid</strong> in an American City: The Case of the Black Community in Los<br />

Angeles, 1987.<br />

391 Huß 2001: 594<br />

392 Walbank 3 1992 (1981): 116f; Blomqvist 1997: 63f. A close parallel to this practice can be seen today in the<br />

Israeli army requisitioning, i.e. occupation, of civilian Palestinian houses on nominally Palestinian land. When<br />

their military use, if any, is no longer required, they are often left littered and partly damaged by the soldiers, for<br />

no apparent reason, and with no compensation or apology offered. Moreover, moveable, valuable Palestinian

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!