Apartheid

Apartheid Apartheid

media.manila.at
from media.manila.at More from this publisher
21.07.2013 Views

166 They refused to issue visas or passes to family members and, moreover, housed the workers adjacent to the mines and factories in hostels, in which men only were allowed to stay. Moreover, at the same time, they did exactly what the Ptolemies had done before them and what the Israelis would do simultaneously and later: try to entice Europeans to immigrate to the country out of a basic motivation of greed – a recipe for disaster in the long run. In Israel, the range of motivation might be somewhat wider, to include the self-styled pioneering adventurers and the religious zealots, none of which, by the way, make things any easier for the indigenous people. Obviously, the growth of a modern economy in South Africa made apartheid increasingly untenable under these long-term demographic conditions. Blacks were needed not only as menial labor, but increasingly also in more skilled occupations and even in managerial ones. As we will see, this meant that some Blacks would have to be allowed education, and that some of them would even have to be encouraged to become educated. In addition, the relentless spread of industrialized capitalism in the world made South African Blacks increasingly needed as consumers of mass-produced commodities. 325 Rapid and competitive population growth becomes normal in apartheid, causing increasingly severe conflicts over resources and space. Both the people, including the invading settlers, and the environment suffer tremendously under the strain. But of course the people who suffer the most are the indigenous. As with the initial invasion and all subsequent physical violence, the basic blame for the population race and its grave consequences must be placed squarely with the invading oppressive minority. The white South African elites saw racial mixing as the worst of evils. White-Black marriage and sexual intercourse had been outlawed in fits and starts since the first white settlements in the 17 th century. Sex between Black and White was again banned in 1927. With the 1950 Immorality Act, sex between White and Non-White was also prohibited. In 1957, finally, ‘intimacy’ between members of different races was outlawed. To kiss someone of the other race could now land one in jail. 326 This aspect of apartheid was brought to the extreme by the South African apartheid state, and I know of no legal parallel to this anywhere else. However, it is still a difference of degree rather than kind. In 1957, some of the powerful Whites with foresight already realized that they were fighting a losing battle with regard to the population race, and they took to such extreme measures to prolong their dominance as long as possible. We will return to this issue in the contexts of citizenship and work in apartheid South Africa. The apartheid immigration policies were detrimental to the country in every possible way, as the following brilliant analysis, comparison, and even personal connection with Israel explains: Immigration to South Africa worked contrary to the normal rules whereby host states can cream off the brightest and best from other countries and immigrants struggle against intense competition – and, not infrequently, prejudice – to make a place for themselves in their adopted countries. If you couldn’t cope with the competition at home, South Africa offered a warm welcome and sheltered employment – as long as you were white. This did no favours to the gene pool and skewed the society further against the forces of reform. In Palestine today, the words of war uttered in strong South African and American accents by Jewish settlers during the past turbulent months speak of a similar scenario. The law of return requires Israel to accept any Jewish person, regardless of their ethics or ability. As well as immigrants of 325 Ibid: 281f; N.N.: Statistics in Brief 1997, 1997; Reader 1998 (1997): 674 326 Lester 1996: 112. The Nazis banned extramarital interracial sex as well as intermarriage, but, as far as I know, not officially ‘intimacy’ between members of different races. See Fredrickson 2002: 124.

talent and principle this must include bigots and losers. The settlements in particular attract fanatics: the nobody from New Jersey who acquires an heroic new role in a narrative that puts him at the forefront of a biblical struggle. Israel and the old South Africa illustrate the dangers of the state based on ethnicity, where there is the notion of a particular ethnic group which prospers at the expense of the perceived lesser races. 327 167 Of course there is racism, structural and personal, in immigration bureaus around the world, but the unique features of apartheid South Africa and present-day Israel are their exceptionally strong structurally racist aspects and their preference towards, and active encouragement of immigrant racists, as long as the latter belong to or wish to and are able to belong to the privileged ethnic group. The healthy challenges to societies presented by normal immigration are thereby eliminated or at least minimized. 2.3. Statisticians, Gynecologists, and Settlers The state of Israel now has an 80 per cent Jewish majority. Yet, there are still almost twice as many Palestinians as there are Israeli Jews, most of the former now being classified by the United Nations as refugees. 328 That is the main reason why Israel does not (yet) qualify as genocidal, but remains an apartheid society, although the degree of ethnic cleansing achieved is very high by all standards. [H]ow did Palestinians become a minority in their homeland when, in 1900, the Jews constituted less than 10 percent of the population, and in 1947, on the eve of the establishment of the state of Israel, less than one-third[?] . . . [A]ll Jews are treated as de jure Israelis who enjoy a permanent ‘right of return to the land of Israel.’ Thus, the Israeli state has decreed that Jews, irrespective of their citizenship, are the legitimate claimants to historical Palestine, and deny this right to its indigenous inhabitants. 329 Beneath this tidy and cruel process of ethnic cleansing, however, is a demographic situation equivalent to that in Graeco-Roman Egypt and in white-ruled South Africa. The indigenous inside the conquered land multiply faster than the invaders and their descendants. There are now 5.1 million Jews and at least 4.8 million Palestinians in Israel and the Occupied Territories, and a Palestinian majority is expected by 2010. From 1967, Israel outlawed and often harassed and arrested Palestinians gathering population statistics. It recently put the number of Palestinians in Jerusalem at 180,000, about 30 per cent of the total 670,000 population of Jerusalem. Commenting on the first legal census carried out by Palestinians in 1997-1998 and released in June 2000, the senior PLO official Faisal Husseini said: ‘In 1967 there were 55,000 Palestinians in Jerusalem; now there are over 300,000. Israel underestimates the number of Palestinians in Jerusalem for political reasons’. After thus coming to a tally almost twice the size of the Israeli estimate, he also said: ‘all Israeli attempts to Judaise Jerusalem have failed and Palestinians’ resistance to being pushed out of the city are represented in the statistics.’ The next Palestinian census that was published claimed that there were 348,586 Palestinians in Jerusalem in 1999, twice as many as the Israelis admitted there were. Israel now appears increasingly desperate about this situation. Between 1967 and 1998, 5,768 residency permits of Palestinians were confiscated by Israel, 327 McGregor 2001 328 According to the Palestinian Census of 1997, there were an estimated 7,921,000 Palestinians worldwide in that year. That included a total of 3,711,000 inside Historic Palestine. See Palestinian Bureau for Statistics, no date. 329 Younis: Liberation and Democratization: The South African and Palestinian National Movements, 2000: 8f

166<br />

They refused to issue visas or passes to family members and, moreover, housed the workers<br />

adjacent to the mines and factories in hostels, in which men only were allowed to stay.<br />

Moreover, at the same time, they did exactly what the Ptolemies had done before them and<br />

what the Israelis would do simultaneously and later: try to entice Europeans to immigrate to<br />

the country out of a basic motivation of greed – a recipe for disaster in the long run. In Israel,<br />

the range of motivation might be somewhat wider, to include the self-styled pioneering<br />

adventurers and the religious zealots, none of which, by the way, make things any easier for<br />

the indigenous people.<br />

Obviously, the growth of a modern economy in South Africa made apartheid<br />

increasingly untenable under these long-term demographic conditions. Blacks were needed<br />

not only as menial labor, but increasingly also in more skilled occupations and even in<br />

managerial ones. As we will see, this meant that some Blacks would have to be allowed<br />

education, and that some of them would even have to be encouraged to become educated. In<br />

addition, the relentless spread of industrialized capitalism in the world made South African<br />

Blacks increasingly needed as consumers of mass-produced commodities. 325<br />

Rapid and competitive population growth becomes normal in apartheid, causing<br />

increasingly severe conflicts over resources and space. Both the people, including the<br />

invading settlers, and the environment suffer tremendously under the strain. But of course the<br />

people who suffer the most are the indigenous. As with the initial invasion and all subsequent<br />

physical violence, the basic blame for the population race and its grave consequences must be<br />

placed squarely with the invading oppressive minority.<br />

The white South African elites saw racial mixing as the worst of evils. White-Black<br />

marriage and sexual intercourse had been outlawed in fits and starts since the first white<br />

settlements in the 17 th century. Sex between Black and White was again banned in 1927. With<br />

the 1950 Immorality Act, sex between White and Non-White was also prohibited. In 1957,<br />

finally, ‘intimacy’ between members of different races was outlawed. To kiss someone of the<br />

other race could now land one in jail. 326<br />

This aspect of apartheid was brought to the extreme by the South African apartheid<br />

state, and I know of no legal parallel to this anywhere else. However, it is still a difference of<br />

degree rather than kind. In 1957, some of the powerful Whites with foresight already realized<br />

that they were fighting a losing battle with regard to the population race, and they took to such<br />

extreme measures to prolong their dominance as long as possible. We will return to this issue<br />

in the contexts of citizenship and work in apartheid South Africa.<br />

The apartheid immigration policies were detrimental to the country in every possible<br />

way, as the following brilliant analysis, comparison, and even personal connection with Israel<br />

explains:<br />

Immigration to South Africa worked contrary to the normal rules<br />

whereby host states can cream off the brightest and best from other<br />

countries and immigrants struggle against intense competition – and,<br />

not infrequently, prejudice – to make a place for themselves in their<br />

adopted countries. If you couldn’t cope with the competition at home,<br />

South Africa offered a warm welcome and sheltered employment – as<br />

long as you were white. This did no favours to the gene pool and<br />

skewed the society further against the forces of reform. In Palestine<br />

today, the words of war uttered in strong South African and American<br />

accents by Jewish settlers during the past turbulent months speak of a<br />

similar scenario. The law of return requires Israel to accept any Jewish<br />

person, regardless of their ethics or ability. As well as immigrants of<br />

325 Ibid: 281f; N.N.: Statistics in Brief 1997, 1997; Reader 1998 (1997): 674<br />

326 Lester 1996: 112. The Nazis banned extramarital interracial sex as well as intermarriage, but, as far as I know,<br />

not officially ‘intimacy’ between members of different races. See Fredrickson 2002: 124.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!