21.07.2013 Views

Apartheid

Apartheid

Apartheid

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

133<br />

gas grenades (in size and color) were used by the IDF, causing long-term injuries and<br />

disabilities. Last but not least, syringes with unidentified contents were used on Palestinians<br />

during interrogation by the Israeli Authority, in addition to different acts of physical and<br />

psychological humiliation. 245<br />

Between December 1987 and September 1988, only two soldiers were found guilty of<br />

murder and manslaughter. One of the reasons why few trials take place is the lack of<br />

complaints because people fear the consequences of such complaints, both for the victims and<br />

the lawyers representing the victims. This is mainly the case with physical violence not<br />

resulting in death. Investigations into deaths are usually carried out by military police, and, on<br />

rare occasions, justice does prevail. The repeated abuses of human rights during the uprising<br />

serve as a reminder that these same abuses caused the rebellion to begin with.<br />

During the first Intifada, more than 100 internal investigations a year were opened by<br />

the Israeli military police. In the second major Intifada, which started in the year 2000, that<br />

number shrank considerably. At the end of 2001, a total of only 59 military police<br />

investigations, of which only 15 involved shooting incidents, had been opened since the start<br />

of the Second Intifada 15 months earlier. Three criminal indictments of Israeli soldiers had<br />

been handed down, but no one had been sentenced. By mid-2003, only 35 cases had made it<br />

to court. One might safely say that the Israeli state thus indirectly encourages its soldiers to<br />

commit crimes against humanity. At the same time, this was a much bloodier conflict than the<br />

previous Intifada, to a large extent precisely because of this new climate of impunity, in which<br />

Israeli soldiers felt free to shoot first and ask questions (if any) later. 246<br />

In what, at first, seems like an opposite development and a genuine improvement, the<br />

Israeli Supreme Court on September 6, 1999 outlawed methods of physical force that had<br />

been implemented legally and routinely in interrogations by Israel’s General Security Service<br />

(GSS). It meant the end of a unique and notorious distinction of the state of Israel. Until then,<br />

it had for some time been the only country in the world with legalized torture. The<br />

interrogation guidelines in effect until then included the use of ‘violent shaking, holding and<br />

tying the interrogee in painful positions, sleep deprivation, covering the interrogee’s head with<br />

a sack, and playing of loud music’. The decision thus ended legal torture of Palestinians in<br />

interrogation. But there were still powerful voices for an amended kind of legalized torture, as<br />

the following account, from an Israeli human rights group, bears witness.<br />

Israel was the only country in the world where torture was legally<br />

sanctioned; the guidelines allowing torture were drafted by a<br />

governmental commission headed by a former Supreme Court Justice<br />

245 Ibid: 37. A huge number of incidents and cases such as these remain unpublished and unnoticed<br />

internationally, a circumstance which further underscores the eventual need for a TRC in Palestine and presentday<br />

Israel. More on Israel’s unique legalized torture below.<br />

246 Wilkinson: Israeli Activists Urge Army to Probe Civilian Slayings, 2001; N.N.: Israel Soldier Made Woman<br />

Drink Cleaning Fluid-Court, June 23, 2003. In this particular case a soldier stood accused of forcing a Palestinian<br />

woman at a checkpoint in Gaza to drink cleaning liquid at gunpoint. The woman survived the poisoning after<br />

being treated at a Gaza hospital. Another incident involved five paramilitary border policemen who were charged<br />

with torturing two Palestinians suspected of wanting to enter Jerusalem illegally. The border guards took the<br />

Palestinians to an abandoned building and began to beat them, according to an indictment charging them with<br />

assault and abuse. A member of the squad then urinated in a bucket, the contents of which were then poured into<br />

the mouth of one of the detainees as a rifle was pressed to the Palestinian’s head. The guards also stubbed out<br />

cigarettes on the hands of both Palestinians before releasing them, the indictment said. See N.N.: Israeli Police<br />

Charged with Abusing Palestinians, September 28, 2004. In a further case, three Israeli paramilitary officers<br />

from a border police unit confessed to forcing two youths to eat gravel, kiss their shoes, and to severely beating<br />

the youths. N.N: Border Policemen Indicted for Abusing Palestinians, June 2, 2004. This indictment only came<br />

about after the results of the abuse had already been shown on television. Israeli human rights groups such as the<br />

Association for Civil Rights in Israel also report tacit approval by the Israeli army of Israeli killings of innocent<br />

Palestinian civilians, e.g. through use of them as human shields, and of other war crimes. See Heller, C.: Israeli<br />

Troops Violate Palestinian Rights -Report, 2003; Nasir: Israel Airstrike Kills 5; Hamas Challenges Abbas, 2006.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!