Apartheid
Apartheid
Apartheid
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
133<br />
gas grenades (in size and color) were used by the IDF, causing long-term injuries and<br />
disabilities. Last but not least, syringes with unidentified contents were used on Palestinians<br />
during interrogation by the Israeli Authority, in addition to different acts of physical and<br />
psychological humiliation. 245<br />
Between December 1987 and September 1988, only two soldiers were found guilty of<br />
murder and manslaughter. One of the reasons why few trials take place is the lack of<br />
complaints because people fear the consequences of such complaints, both for the victims and<br />
the lawyers representing the victims. This is mainly the case with physical violence not<br />
resulting in death. Investigations into deaths are usually carried out by military police, and, on<br />
rare occasions, justice does prevail. The repeated abuses of human rights during the uprising<br />
serve as a reminder that these same abuses caused the rebellion to begin with.<br />
During the first Intifada, more than 100 internal investigations a year were opened by<br />
the Israeli military police. In the second major Intifada, which started in the year 2000, that<br />
number shrank considerably. At the end of 2001, a total of only 59 military police<br />
investigations, of which only 15 involved shooting incidents, had been opened since the start<br />
of the Second Intifada 15 months earlier. Three criminal indictments of Israeli soldiers had<br />
been handed down, but no one had been sentenced. By mid-2003, only 35 cases had made it<br />
to court. One might safely say that the Israeli state thus indirectly encourages its soldiers to<br />
commit crimes against humanity. At the same time, this was a much bloodier conflict than the<br />
previous Intifada, to a large extent precisely because of this new climate of impunity, in which<br />
Israeli soldiers felt free to shoot first and ask questions (if any) later. 246<br />
In what, at first, seems like an opposite development and a genuine improvement, the<br />
Israeli Supreme Court on September 6, 1999 outlawed methods of physical force that had<br />
been implemented legally and routinely in interrogations by Israel’s General Security Service<br />
(GSS). It meant the end of a unique and notorious distinction of the state of Israel. Until then,<br />
it had for some time been the only country in the world with legalized torture. The<br />
interrogation guidelines in effect until then included the use of ‘violent shaking, holding and<br />
tying the interrogee in painful positions, sleep deprivation, covering the interrogee’s head with<br />
a sack, and playing of loud music’. The decision thus ended legal torture of Palestinians in<br />
interrogation. But there were still powerful voices for an amended kind of legalized torture, as<br />
the following account, from an Israeli human rights group, bears witness.<br />
Israel was the only country in the world where torture was legally<br />
sanctioned; the guidelines allowing torture were drafted by a<br />
governmental commission headed by a former Supreme Court Justice<br />
245 Ibid: 37. A huge number of incidents and cases such as these remain unpublished and unnoticed<br />
internationally, a circumstance which further underscores the eventual need for a TRC in Palestine and presentday<br />
Israel. More on Israel’s unique legalized torture below.<br />
246 Wilkinson: Israeli Activists Urge Army to Probe Civilian Slayings, 2001; N.N.: Israel Soldier Made Woman<br />
Drink Cleaning Fluid-Court, June 23, 2003. In this particular case a soldier stood accused of forcing a Palestinian<br />
woman at a checkpoint in Gaza to drink cleaning liquid at gunpoint. The woman survived the poisoning after<br />
being treated at a Gaza hospital. Another incident involved five paramilitary border policemen who were charged<br />
with torturing two Palestinians suspected of wanting to enter Jerusalem illegally. The border guards took the<br />
Palestinians to an abandoned building and began to beat them, according to an indictment charging them with<br />
assault and abuse. A member of the squad then urinated in a bucket, the contents of which were then poured into<br />
the mouth of one of the detainees as a rifle was pressed to the Palestinian’s head. The guards also stubbed out<br />
cigarettes on the hands of both Palestinians before releasing them, the indictment said. See N.N.: Israeli Police<br />
Charged with Abusing Palestinians, September 28, 2004. In a further case, three Israeli paramilitary officers<br />
from a border police unit confessed to forcing two youths to eat gravel, kiss their shoes, and to severely beating<br />
the youths. N.N: Border Policemen Indicted for Abusing Palestinians, June 2, 2004. This indictment only came<br />
about after the results of the abuse had already been shown on television. Israeli human rights groups such as the<br />
Association for Civil Rights in Israel also report tacit approval by the Israeli army of Israeli killings of innocent<br />
Palestinian civilians, e.g. through use of them as human shields, and of other war crimes. See Heller, C.: Israeli<br />
Troops Violate Palestinian Rights -Report, 2003; Nasir: Israel Airstrike Kills 5; Hamas Challenges Abbas, 2006.