Apartheid

Apartheid Apartheid

media.manila.at
from media.manila.at More from this publisher
21.07.2013 Views

122 latest. Israel, Britain and the USA were involved in the secret South African nuclear weapons program, which was considered or portrayed as defensive by the involved governments against a perceived Soviet threat against the anti-communist regime in Pretoria. After the introduction of US sanctions on South Africa in 1986, illegal clandestine assistance with arms deliveries and arms development came mainly from Israel, with unofficial US blessings. 211 The South African military’s secret chemical and biological weapons program, ‘Project Coast’, with a staff of around 70, produced weapons and poisons which were used to assassinate at least hundreds of ANC members and other enemies of apartheid in South Africa and abroad. The covert army ‘Medical Battalion’ behind the program produced lethal screw drivers, bicycle pumps, walking sticks, umbrellas and tear gas. It also produced ‘thallium in beer, salmonella in sugar, paraquat in whisky’ and had further programs, some of them probably implemented, to spread poisonous drugs and chemicals, cholera, botulism, anthrax, and HIV-tainted blood among southern African Black civilian populations to pacify, sterilize, incapacitate or kill them. 212 According to the testimony of a former state agent, there were also orders to spread cholera and yellow fever by contaminating drinking water at refugee camps in neighboring Namibia in 1988, prior to that country’s first democratic elections. 213 The leader of the ‘Medical Battalion’ was Wouter Basson, nicknamed ‘Dr. Death’, who has been compared to Nazi Germany’s infamous Josef Mengele. We shall return to Basson’s plight a little later. The genocidal parameters and mind-sets were certainly present in this unit. Dr. Mike Odendaal, a microbiologist on ‘Project Coast’, was quoted by The New Yorker magazine as saying: [O]ne of the major tenets of chemical warfare is that you don’t use these things on your own soil. . . .the cholera in the Eastern Cape [one of the regions most rebellious against both British colonial domination and apartheid] probably came from my lab, and it probably did kill old people and kids…I only read about it in the papers and then was confronted about it at the TRC. No details have 211 Saito (senior writer): The Road to the Abolition of Nuclear Weapons, 1999: 198. The nuclear arsenal of South Africa was scrapped on President F.W. de Klerk’s orders in 1993, a year before the introduction of democracy and black majority rule. See also Hounam & McQuillan: The Mini-Nuke Conspiracy: Mandela’s Nuclear Nightmare, 1995. 212 Lovell: South Africa Truth Body Opens Chemical Warfare Hearing, 1998; N.N.: Apartheid Weapons Boss Asked for HIV-Tainted Blood, May 24, 2000; The Truth and Reconciliation Commission Final Report, 1998, Vol. 2, Chapter 6c, Special Investigation into Project Coast: South Africa’s Chemical and Biological Warfare Programme. Some researchers have suggested that investigations should be carried out as to whether the plans to spread HIV among Blacks, in South Africa and in the surrounding countries, were actually implemented by the ‘Medical Battalion’ or some other clandestine state death squad. It could help to explain the extremely high incidence of HIV and AIDS infection in the southern African region, which is by far the highest in the world. Africa south of the Sahara accounted for an estimated 15 million of the world’s total 21.8 million AIDS-related deaths by 2001. Two years later, 29.4 million out of all 42 million people worldwide who were infected with HIV were Africans. South Africa itself has more people living with HIV-AIDS than any other single country, 5 out of 45 million South Africans, i.e. one in every nine is infected. In the seven southernmost countries of Africa at least one adult in five is now living with HIV, according to the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. Southern Africa is home to about 30 percent of people living with HIV/AIDS worldwide, yet the region has less than two percent of the global population. See N.N.: Factbox: Africa Ravaged by AIDS Epidemic, July 5, 2002; N.N.: South Africa – Economic Powerhouse Ravaged by AIDS, July 8, 2003; Reaney: World AIDS Deaths, Infections at New Highs, 2003. On these and related issues, see also Boateng: South Africa: ‘Dr. Death’ on Trial, 2001. The Israeli apartheid regime’s secret service and international assassination squad, the Mossad, has also been held responsible for spreading HIV/AIDS deliberately. 426 Libyan children were infected in 1999, when Libya was one of Israel’s main enemies. At the time of writing, one Palestinian doctor and five Bulgarian nurses stand accused of carrying out the task at a children’s hospital in Benghazi. The US counterpart to the Mossad, the CIA, has also been accused of the crime. See Brunwasser: Bulgarian Nurses’ Case in Libya Seems to Turn, 2006. 213 Swindells: South Africa Learns Secrets of “Dr Death”, 2000

come out but it was probably put in the water. That, again, is something you produce to use in enemy territory, not on your own people. And it doesn’t make any sense, if you want to make a dent in the black population, to poison a couple of hundred people, putting a strain on your own health services. You need to kill 10 million to make a difference. 214 123 Odendaal’s afterthought apparently makes it acceptable, even preferable, to kill ten million Blacks (to make a ‘dent’), rather than just a few hundred. Of course, Odendaal may also be speaking satirically here. But if he is, then there were other people close to him at the time who really thought this way. We will deal with the ubiquitous apartheid motivation and justification by means of ‘demographic necessity’ for mass killings, especially in South Africa and Israel, in the next section. The revelations of (some) details about the extensive chemical and biological weapons program, and indeed of its existence, are due to the TRC and could be considered one of its greatest victories. Without its amnesty provision the world might never have known anything at all about ‘Project Coast’ and the ‘Medical Battalion’. Aside from the TRC cases, there are many other examples that demonstrate the brutality and often illegality of physical violence practiced or condoned by the South African ruling minority. Between 1948 and 1954, 104 Africans were killed and more than 240 wounded by the police in cases related to political demonstrations alone. By 1960, the estimated number had risen to over 300 killed and 500 wounded, mainly by gunfire and beatings. Compared to the more than 1,000 Palestinians killed by the state of Israel similarly in 2002 alone, this is not a great number. It is, however, enough to warrant investigations, especially since victims are still paying the price for these crimes today. In the Soweto uprising, over 200 unarmed and peacefully demonstrating unarmed children and youths were killed by police and soldiers on June 17, 1976, the first day of the uprising. The police also injured hundreds of minors, arrested and imprisoned hundreds more, subjecting many to brutal torture. 215 In retrospect, it may be the greatest shortcoming of the TRC that it has concentrated so much on physical violence, and left a great deal of structural violence out of the picture. Nobody applied for amnesty, because none was needed, for condemning millions to poverty, a lower quality of life and a shorter life expectancy. This is all the more disturbing since it has been estimated that more than 1.5 million people were killed directly or indirectly (particularly in famines that broke out as results of the wars) by the South African apartheid (in the narrow sense) regime, but ‘only’ around 26,000 in South Africa itself during those 46 years. 216 At least 98 per cent of those killed were thus outside the country, particularly in Mozambique, Angola and Namibia. Many of these victims were of course South African freedom fighters in exile, but there were very large numbers of indigenous civilian and noncivilian victims in these countries as well. Partly because of the continued absence of an operational International Criminal Court, due to the active resistance from a few rogue states such as the USA, Israel, China, North Korea and Libya, nearly all of the crimes of South 214 Boateng 2001. Originally quoted by William Finnegan in The New Yorker magazine, January 15, 2001. On the so-called ‘health services’ for Blacks in South Africa under apartheid, which in fact consisted of twice as many family planning clinics as health clinics in 1991 and included forced sterilization, see Chapters II.2.2 and 6.2, below. 215 Mandela 3 1990 (1978): 125; Bonner & Segal: Soweto: A History, 1998: 88-93 216 See African National Congress: Statement to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, 1996, and Further Submissions and Responses by the African National Congress to Questions Raised by the Commission for Truth and Reconciliation, 1997. Chomsky puts the figure even higher: ‘During the Reagan years [1981-1989] alone…US/UK-backed South African attacks against the neighboring countries killed about a million and a half people and left 60 billion dollars in damage and countries destroyed.’ Chomsky: The New War Against Terror, 2001.

come out but it was probably put in the water. That, again, is<br />

something you produce to use in enemy territory, not on your own<br />

people. And it doesn’t make any sense, if you want to make a dent in<br />

the black population, to poison a couple of hundred people, putting a<br />

strain on your own health services. You need to kill 10 million to<br />

make a difference. 214<br />

123<br />

Odendaal’s afterthought apparently makes it acceptable, even preferable, to kill ten<br />

million Blacks (to make a ‘dent’), rather than just a few hundred. Of course, Odendaal may<br />

also be speaking satirically here. But if he is, then there were other people close to him at the<br />

time who really thought this way. We will deal with the ubiquitous apartheid motivation and<br />

justification by means of ‘demographic necessity’ for mass killings, especially in South Africa<br />

and Israel, in the next section.<br />

The revelations of (some) details about the extensive chemical and biological weapons<br />

program, and indeed of its existence, are due to the TRC and could be considered one of its<br />

greatest victories. Without its amnesty provision the world might never have known anything<br />

at all about ‘Project Coast’ and the ‘Medical Battalion’.<br />

Aside from the TRC cases, there are many other examples that demonstrate the<br />

brutality and often illegality of physical violence practiced or condoned by the South African<br />

ruling minority. Between 1948 and 1954, 104 Africans were killed and more than 240<br />

wounded by the police in cases related to political demonstrations alone. By 1960, the<br />

estimated number had risen to over 300 killed and 500 wounded, mainly by gunfire and<br />

beatings. Compared to the more than 1,000 Palestinians killed by the state of Israel similarly<br />

in 2002 alone, this is not a great number. It is, however, enough to warrant investigations,<br />

especially since victims are still paying the price for these crimes today. In the Soweto<br />

uprising, over 200 unarmed and peacefully demonstrating unarmed children and youths were<br />

killed by police and soldiers on June 17, 1976, the first day of the uprising. The police also<br />

injured hundreds of minors, arrested and imprisoned hundreds more, subjecting many to<br />

brutal torture. 215<br />

In retrospect, it may be the greatest shortcoming of the TRC that it has concentrated so<br />

much on physical violence, and left a great deal of structural violence out of the picture.<br />

Nobody applied for amnesty, because none was needed, for condemning millions to poverty, a<br />

lower quality of life and a shorter life expectancy. This is all the more disturbing since it has<br />

been estimated that more than 1.5 million people were killed directly or indirectly<br />

(particularly in famines that broke out as results of the wars) by the South African apartheid<br />

(in the narrow sense) regime, but ‘only’ around 26,000 in South Africa itself during those 46<br />

years. 216 At least 98 per cent of those killed were thus outside the country, particularly in<br />

Mozambique, Angola and Namibia. Many of these victims were of course South African<br />

freedom fighters in exile, but there were very large numbers of indigenous civilian and noncivilian<br />

victims in these countries as well. Partly because of the continued absence of an<br />

operational International Criminal Court, due to the active resistance from a few rogue states<br />

such as the USA, Israel, China, North Korea and Libya, nearly all of the crimes of South<br />

214 Boateng 2001. Originally quoted by William Finnegan in The New Yorker magazine, January 15, 2001. On<br />

the so-called ‘health services’ for Blacks in South Africa under apartheid, which in fact consisted of twice as<br />

many family planning clinics as health clinics in 1991 and included forced sterilization, see Chapters II.2.2 and<br />

6.2, below.<br />

215 Mandela 3 1990 (1978): 125; Bonner & Segal: Soweto: A History, 1998: 88-93<br />

216 See African National Congress: Statement to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, 1996, and Further<br />

Submissions and Responses by the African National Congress to Questions Raised by the Commission for Truth<br />

and Reconciliation, 1997. Chomsky puts the figure even higher: ‘During the Reagan years [1981-1989]<br />

alone…US/UK-backed South African attacks against the neighboring countries killed about a million and a half<br />

people and left 60 billion dollars in damage and countries destroyed.’ Chomsky: The New War Against Terror,<br />

2001.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!