Apartheid
Apartheid Apartheid
100 sidedness, due to context, and I believe it is indeed a much-needed corrective. Furthermore, I am convinced that many more will be needed. Besides, there are, in my opinion, a great deal more bad aspects to the side that creates, defends and promotes apartheid and other crimes against humanity. I will return to these issues in the Conclusions. In summary of this first part of my investigation, apartheid is a structure that can be found under many different circumstances and conditions. But it always involves the undemocratic rule of an invading minority and its self-defined descendants. It also involves an important civilian element of this oppressive minority as well as a strong and independent state. As for the differences between apartheid societies: South Africa and Egypt, for instance, did not have a biased, all-important ‘peace-broker’ like Israel does in the USA. Yet, Britain and the USA did play a similar, though weaker, role for South Africa in the later stages of apartheid in the wide sense. As we shall see, Rome also played a similar role during the later history of the Ptolemaic state. Both Israel/Palestine and Graeco-Roman Egypt were ‘handed over’ from one set of occupying forces and ethnicist minority rulers to another. In Israel’s case, however, only part of what is now Israel, and an even smaller part of what is now under Israeli military and political control, was handed over to the de facto invaders by the UN. Palestine and Graeco-Roman Egypt also share not having to deal with disastrous disease epidemics being spread (inadvertently or not) by the new occupiers. Furthermore, also unlike South Africa, Palestine and Egypt were never slave-labor based economies under apartheid. On the other hand, Israel and South Africa were both propped up by NATO, the latter allegedly as an anti-Communist bulwark in the region, the former for no official reasons other than the right of the ‘Jewish state to exist’, unofficially though, for US and other NATO member countries’ strategic access to Middle East oil as well as fear of Islamic or Arab power coupled with very strong Zionist lobbying groups in the USA and beyond. 167 South Africa and Israel were no superpowers like the USA, the Soviet Union or the British Empire, respectively, at the height of their power. That also sets them apart from Ptolemaic Egypt, which was, for a while, the world’s leading military and political power. Yet the former two were (and Israel still is) among the four to ten (at the most) strongest military powers in the world. And, as I will try to show, the essential system of violence, oppression, and exploitation is the same in each of my three main examples of apartheid. In fact, it is glaringly similar in the two more current cases. Israel’s apartheid policies are based on the following elements: The exclusive claim of one group to a country at the exclusion of non-Jews accompanied by their attempt to physically separate from them; displacement of the indigenous Palestinian population and the seizure of their lands and properties, confining them to small enclaves and transforming them into a permanent underclass; formalization of unequal power relations through discriminatory laws and policies, enforced by political means as well as by the military and security services; and the formulation of a meta-narrative that supports the claims of the dominant group over the others, demonizing and excluding the ‘others’’ claims. . . . In the Gaza Strip, it means, among other things, that 500,000 Palestinian refugees will remain holed up in 3 square miles of derelict camps surrounded by barbed wire and patrolled 24 hours a day. While more than one million Palestinians in the Gaza Strip have access to only 60% of the land, 4,000 Israeli soldiers occupy 35%. The average Israeli settler has 146 times more living space than his Palestinian 167 Mearsheimer & Walt 2006; Albert: Interview with Chomsky, In Depth Discussion on Israel/Palestine, 2002. See also Wright: U.S. Isolated But Dominant at Middle East Talks, 2002; Plitnick 2003, and Chapter II.9.3, below.
counterpart. Thus, with the rapid shrinkage of Palestinian land even to bury their dead, the similarity with apartheid South Africa is all too self-evident. Under the latter system a 5% white minority appropriated 87% of the land. 168 101 I will attempt to show that there are even more and even closer parallels between the South African and Israeli apartheid systems in the following. First and foremost, apartheid is based upon the de facto invasion of a country or a region by an oppressive minority. The human rights violations that accompany and follow this invasion amount to a pattern or a structure, under which the indigenous majority is subjugated, exploited and otherwise victimized, often and essentially in a violent manner. Members of the ethnic elite are also victimized, both by other members of the same elite and by resistance fighters, but never to the large extent that the prime victims are. The pattern consists of nine holes, which are all plugged in an apartheid society, if it exists long enough. The holes are plugged, one by one, in different sequences and under different circumstances, in order to maximize control over and exploitation of natural and human resources in a conquered land. The first and most important one, however, is violence. The holes are interdependent, sometimes mutually reinforcing, sometimes rather balancing each other. Thus, if violence becomes rampant then apartheid thought is usually provoked and follows suit by becoming more extremist; but apartheid thought may also be weakened, take a vacation, as it were, when levels of violence rise. The process of apartheid oppression on a macro-level is fairly simple. It could also be crudely likened with the checking of items on a shopping list. I cannot determine to what extent this is carried out consciously, but I believe it gets more conscious with time. Today, Israeli apartheid has the most precedents, and it therefore probably exhibits the most consciously perpetrated, and the strategically, militarily, legally, and diplomatically most sophisticated form of apartheid. 169 Graeco-Roman Egypt, in sharp contrast, did not have the wealth of historical material that has been at the disposal of proponents of 20 th - and 21 st - century apartheid. For example, the Greek and Roman forms of ethnicist taxation, which was actually the main form of economic exploitation in Egypt – as opposed to slavery elsewhere in 168 El Fassed: Satyagraha to End Apartheid in Palestine, 2001. El Fassed might be referring to a five per cent minority of white land-owning families in South Africa, or to the class of land-owning Whites. During apartheid in the narrow sense the white population as a whole dropped from around 21 per cent to around 14 per cent of the total population. It has since slipped further, to under 11 per cent, due to white flight as well as to humanized immigration laws and practices, including the reintegration of South Africa into its continental economic, social, cultural and political contexts, among many other factors. See Chapter II.2.2, below. On Israeli disregard for – or provocation against – Islamic law, which requires that the dead be buried quickly, see Johnston: Palestinians Still Unable to Bury Rafah Dead, 2004. The Palestinians, however, have also desecrated Israeli corpses, for instance those of soldiers killed in Gaza by Palestinian freedom fighters, previous to the big-scale incursion into Rafah with its concomitant Israeli massacres of indigenous civilians. See Sagar: The Crash of Civilizations, 2004. On El Fassed’s call for ‘satyagraha’ in Palestine – Mahatma Gandhi’s concept of non-violent resistance which inspired both the civil rights movement in the USA and the resistance against South African apartheid – see also Tomasevic: Israel’s W.Bank Barrier Like Apartheid--Gandhi Kin, 2004, which describes how Gandhi’s grandson, Arun Gandhi, takes a firm stance against Israeli apartheid, and encourages further non-violent resistance by Palestinians and the international community. 169 A confidential 10-year forecast government report, prepared by Israel’s foreign ministry and then leaked by (or to?) the media, warns that ‘Israel could end up on a collision course with the European Union and face sanctions like apartheid-era South Africa...’ And as the expanding EU might grow more powerful and influential to the detriment of Israel’s main ally, the USA, the report cautions that ‘the Jewish state could become increasingly isolated internationally’. Spetalnick: Israel, Europe Could Be on Collision Course –Report, 2004. The quotes and the facts speak for themselves in this regard. In my opinion, Israel has every reason – good and bad – to learn from the South African apartheid experience, as opposed to Israel’s foes and victims. I believe that knowledge gathered from my own investigation can therefore be used, for human rights, reconciliation, and peace. But it could also be abused, in order to cover up and even to intensify crimes against humanity. It is therefore my hope that this investigation be used first and foremost by opponents and victims of apartheid rather than by perpetrators and apologists for it, unless of course the latter be converted to abandon their belief and role in or support of apartheid.
- Page 49 and 50: systematically by people who identi
- Page 51 and 52: white-ruled South Africa, linguisti
- Page 53 and 54: Indeed, only half a year lies betwe
- Page 55 and 56: involvement of strong First World n
- Page 57 and 58: world, both in extent and in intens
- Page 59 and 60: with South Africa is the presence o
- Page 61 and 62: exception, since only very few ‘E
- Page 63 and 64: essentially excuses for oppression,
- Page 65 and 66: school texts, have been found in th
- Page 67 and 68: closer to each other in an overall
- Page 69 and 70: This independence also has profound
- Page 71 and 72: Brazil. 91 There are of course exce
- Page 73 and 74: sovereignty and strength of the sta
- Page 75 and 76: especially Tasmania, Namibia under
- Page 77 and 78: colonies, which may also give rise
- Page 79 and 80: difficult method of turning themsel
- Page 81 and 82: under Byzantine rule was a continua
- Page 83 and 84: During the 19 th century, over 152,
- Page 85 and 86: Alex and Stephen Shalom: More than
- Page 87 and 88: Israel has constructed over 200 ill
- Page 89 and 90: eflection of how far propaganda can
- Page 91 and 92: Today’s volatile situation in Pal
- Page 93 and 94: In fact, as we shall see, every fou
- Page 95 and 96: were neutral as well as ignored cou
- Page 97 and 98: does not mean, however, that Europe
- Page 99: human rights violations, that they
- Page 103 and 104: II. A System of Gross Human Rights
- Page 105 and 106: 105 ‘Palestinians’, Israel has
- Page 107 and 108: 107 by orders or even laws from abo
- Page 109 and 110: 109 though it also saves lives and
- Page 111 and 112: 1. Violence 111 The use of physical
- Page 113 and 114: 113 In each of the three apartheid
- Page 115 and 116: 115 Later (and possibly earlier) le
- Page 117 and 118: 117 The first example of systematic
- Page 119 and 120: 119 1879. Only three years later, h
- Page 121 and 122: 121 handcuffed into the back of a p
- Page 123 and 124: come out but it was probably put in
- Page 125 and 126: 125 (UNITA in Angola) and Rhodesia
- Page 127 and 128: 127 the equality of rights have ero
- Page 129 and 130: 129 an entity capable of self-deter
- Page 131 and 132: 131 rights violations, especially o
- Page 133 and 134: 133 gas grenades (in size and color
- Page 135 and 136: 135 Palestinian children in Israeli
- Page 137 and 138: 137 Between 1987 and 2003, the IAEA
- Page 139 and 140: Times: ‘There is hardly a single
- Page 141 and 142: 141 were complete. Due to this, Whi
- Page 143 and 144: 143 the state of Israel’s in-vitr
- Page 145 and 146: 145 murders are thus often given fu
- Page 147 and 148: 147 as a majoritarian democracy is
- Page 149 and 150: 149 Authority, which does not prose
counterpart. Thus, with the rapid shrinkage of Palestinian land even to<br />
bury their dead, the similarity with apartheid South Africa is all too<br />
self-evident. Under the latter system a 5% white minority appropriated<br />
87% of the land. 168<br />
101<br />
I will attempt to show that there are even more and even closer parallels between the<br />
South African and Israeli apartheid systems in the following. First and foremost, apartheid is<br />
based upon the de facto invasion of a country or a region by an oppressive minority. The<br />
human rights violations that accompany and follow this invasion amount to a pattern or a<br />
structure, under which the indigenous majority is subjugated, exploited and otherwise<br />
victimized, often and essentially in a violent manner. Members of the ethnic elite are also<br />
victimized, both by other members of the same elite and by resistance fighters, but never to<br />
the large extent that the prime victims are. The pattern consists of nine holes, which are all<br />
plugged in an apartheid society, if it exists long enough. The holes are plugged, one by one, in<br />
different sequences and under different circumstances, in order to maximize control over and<br />
exploitation of natural and human resources in a conquered land. The first and most important<br />
one, however, is violence. The holes are interdependent, sometimes mutually reinforcing,<br />
sometimes rather balancing each other. Thus, if violence becomes rampant then apartheid<br />
thought is usually provoked and follows suit by becoming more extremist; but apartheid<br />
thought may also be weakened, take a vacation, as it were, when levels of violence rise.<br />
The process of apartheid oppression on a macro-level is fairly simple. It could also be<br />
crudely likened with the checking of items on a shopping list. I cannot determine to what<br />
extent this is carried out consciously, but I believe it gets more conscious with time. Today,<br />
Israeli apartheid has the most precedents, and it therefore probably exhibits the most<br />
consciously perpetrated, and the strategically, militarily, legally, and diplomatically most<br />
sophisticated form of apartheid. 169 Graeco-Roman Egypt, in sharp contrast, did not have the<br />
wealth of historical material that has been at the disposal of proponents of 20 th - and 21 st -<br />
century apartheid. For example, the Greek and Roman forms of ethnicist taxation, which was<br />
actually the main form of economic exploitation in Egypt – as opposed to slavery elsewhere in<br />
168 El Fassed: Satyagraha to End <strong>Apartheid</strong> in Palestine, 2001. El Fassed might be referring to a five per cent<br />
minority of white land-owning families in South Africa, or to the class of land-owning Whites. During apartheid<br />
in the narrow sense the white population as a whole dropped from around 21 per cent to around 14 per cent of<br />
the total population. It has since slipped further, to under 11 per cent, due to white flight as well as to humanized<br />
immigration laws and practices, including the reintegration of South Africa into its continental economic, social,<br />
cultural and political contexts, among many other factors. See Chapter II.2.2, below. On Israeli disregard for – or<br />
provocation against – Islamic law, which requires that the dead be buried quickly, see Johnston: Palestinians Still<br />
Unable to Bury Rafah Dead, 2004. The Palestinians, however, have also desecrated Israeli corpses, for instance<br />
those of soldiers killed in Gaza by Palestinian freedom fighters, previous to the big-scale incursion into Rafah<br />
with its concomitant Israeli massacres of indigenous civilians. See Sagar: The Crash of Civilizations, 2004. On<br />
El Fassed’s call for ‘satyagraha’ in Palestine – Mahatma Gandhi’s concept of non-violent resistance which<br />
inspired both the civil rights movement in the USA and the resistance against South African apartheid – see also<br />
Tomasevic: Israel’s W.Bank Barrier Like <strong>Apartheid</strong>--Gandhi Kin, 2004, which describes how Gandhi’s<br />
grandson, Arun Gandhi, takes a firm stance against Israeli apartheid, and encourages further non-violent<br />
resistance by Palestinians and the international community.<br />
169 A confidential 10-year forecast government report, prepared by Israel’s foreign ministry and then leaked by<br />
(or to?) the media, warns that ‘Israel could end up on a collision course with the European Union and face<br />
sanctions like apartheid-era South Africa...’ And as the expanding EU might grow more powerful and influential<br />
to the detriment of Israel’s main ally, the USA, the report cautions that ‘the Jewish state could become<br />
increasingly isolated internationally’. Spetalnick: Israel, Europe Could Be on Collision Course –Report, 2004.<br />
The quotes and the facts speak for themselves in this regard. In my opinion, Israel has every reason – good and<br />
bad – to learn from the South African apartheid experience, as opposed to Israel’s foes and victims. I believe that<br />
knowledge gathered from my own investigation can therefore be used, for human rights, reconciliation, and<br />
peace. But it could also be abused, in order to cover up and even to intensify crimes against humanity. It is<br />
therefore my hope that this investigation be used first and foremost by opponents and victims of apartheid rather<br />
than by perpetrators and apologists for it, unless of course the latter be converted to abandon their belief and role<br />
in or support of apartheid.