Essential Guide to E-mail Marketing - Haymarket

Essential Guide to E-mail Marketing - Haymarket Essential Guide to E-mail Marketing - Haymarket

media.haymarketmedia.com
from media.haymarketmedia.com More from this publisher
21.07.2013 Views

I’M NOT SAYING REACHING ME ONLINE IS EASY. I’M SAYING IT’S THE ONLY WAY TO REACH ME. LET ACXIOM HELP YOU REACH MORE. EFFECTIVELY. When you try to connect with customers, do you actually reach them? If you’re not leveraging digital channels, then you’re missing your best opportunity. That’s where Acxiom can help. Our expertise in all aspects of digital marketing will help you make every communication count. Find out more about our digital capabilities at www.acxiom.com or 888-3ACXIOM. CUSTOMER DATA INTEGRATION ■ DATA ■ IT SERVICES ■ DIRECT MARKETING ■ DIGITAL ■ RISK MITIGATION ■ CONSULTING ©2007 Acxiom Corporation. All rights reserved. Acxiom is a registered trademark of Acxiom Corporation. “WE MAKE INFORMATION INTELLIGENT” is a trademark of Acxiom Corporation.

26 INFRASTRUCTURE DM News • E-Mail Marketing Guide 2007 to increase their open rates. It is especially important for small businesses to build reputation through consistent e-mail behavior and a good permission-based list. Negative results such as spam reports and bounce rates affect reputation and negatively impact deliverability. Your recipients’ behavior (whether or not they report your mail as spam) is important to your reputation with them and their ISPs. Anything out of the ordinary may convince recipients that they have been spammed: Even opt-in mail becomes spam if a recipient labels it as such. Therefore, small businesses need to make developing trust and recognition a priority. The first step is to organize your contact database. To ensure a good reputation, you should keep your distribution lists updated and your e-mail relevant. ■ All e-mail lists should be opt-in Ellen Siegel Constant Contact only. Let people know they can easily unsubscribe at any time and adhere to their requests. ■ Monitor your bounces and keep your list up to date. Mailing repeatedly to a bounced address can hurt your reputation with an ISP. The second step in building reputation is exhibiting consistent email behavior — make sure your recipients understand how often you’ll send them e-mail messages. Additional steps to increase successful delivery include the following: ■ Be sure recipients recognize you as the sender. The name next to your “from” address must be clearly identifiable to your subscribers, bearing in mind that in many cases your company’s name is more recognizable than those of your employees. Encourage recipients to put your “from address” in their address book, trusted sender list or approved sender list. ■ Content matters. Help ensure your recipients won’t delete or report your mail by making the subject line clear and relevant. Also avoid “spammy” words, excess capitalization or use of exclamation points that may trigger ISP content filters. ■ If you use an e-mail service provider, improve your reputation by making sure they have solid, long-standing relationships with the major ISPs. If they look good, you look good. Finally, follow industry best practices. Stand behind your e-mail and protect your brand by using e-mail authentication. Honor unsubscribe requests promptly. If you use an ESP, leverage its expertise and infrastructure in these areas. By taking these simple steps you will be well on your way to developing trusted relationships with your recipients and ensuring your e-mail communications not only make it to your intended contacts’ inboxes, but are also actually read. Ellen Siegel is the principal technologist at Constant Contact. She can be reached at esiegel@constantcontact.com. CAN-SPAM, four years on BY JEREMY SAIBIL In December of 2003, President Bush signed the CAN-SPAM Act into law. The CAN-SPAM Act set rules for sending commercial e-mail, including mandatory inclusion of an opt-out mech- anism, adding a physical address to the message and using a legitimate subject line. So four years later, what is the assessment of the CAN-SPAM Act? Government officials, Internet service providers (ISPs) and e-mail service providers (ESPs) generally agree that the law has had a positive effect. Genuine marketers are not seen as major contributors to the SPAM problem. Still, it is a criminal element that continues to be responsible for much of the harmful SPAM being sent today, and the US government still sees SPAM as a pressing issue and is focusing on enforcing the law, rather than changing it. The good, the bad and the evil Let’s start with evil: many experts agree that an increasing portion of SPAM is related to illegal activities. Some common examples: ■ Pump-and-dump stock scams ■ Identity theft and fraud ■ Scams (I am the widow of an African dictator…) Unfortunately, many people are still falling for these scams and fuelling the spammers’ fire. The good: ESPs and ISPs have worked well together to put in place standards and technology that prevent forged e-mail and better allow recipients to manage what mail they want to receive. In the past few years, the sender policy framework (SPF), sender ID and domain keys, (authentication protocols supported by such products as Campaigner) have been developed and are now widely adopted. In another example, ISPs have set up feedback loops with ESPs so that SPAM complaints can be transmitted to senders in real time. Strong authentication tools are needed to establish the reputation of individual senders. Eventually, like on eBay, recipients will be able to see a sender’s reputation before agreeing to engage in a relationship. As a marketer, it is important to start thinking of Jeremy Saibil Campaigner ESSENTIAL GUIDE your e-mail reputation, if you are not already. Many ISPs are already providing filtering tools to their users. AOL pioneered the “report spam” button in its mail client and others followed. Yahoo has a “this is not junk” button, and Hotmail is working on a way to let people unsubscribe using a tool in the Hotmail interface instead of the link in the message itself. The trend giving more control to recipients is one that will continue. This brings us to the bad. Some marketers are still not following all of the best practices put forward by the industry and rules required by law: Get permission, provide an opt-out, and include a physical address Another factor affecting your reputation is the relevance of your content. Despite having opt-in status, if you are sending offers that are only of interest to a segment of your list, you may be receiving complaints. So target your message to relevant segments and spare the rest. Take a common-sense approach and your reputation will be fine. Jeremy Saibil is director of deliverability at Campaigner. He can be reached at jsaibil@campaigner.com.

26 INFRASTRUCTURE DM News • E-Mail <strong>Marketing</strong> <strong>Guide</strong> 2007<br />

<strong>to</strong> increase their open rates.<br />

It is especially important for small businesses <strong>to</strong> build reputation<br />

through consistent e-<strong>mail</strong> behavior and a good permission-based<br />

list. Negative results such as spam reports and bounce rates affect<br />

reputation and negatively impact deliverability. Your recipients’<br />

behavior (whether or not they report your <strong>mail</strong> as spam) is important<br />

<strong>to</strong> your reputation with them and their ISPs. Anything out of<br />

the ordinary may convince recipients that they have been<br />

spammed: Even opt-in <strong>mail</strong><br />

becomes spam if a recipient labels<br />

it as such. Therefore, small businesses<br />

need <strong>to</strong> make developing<br />

trust and recognition a priority.<br />

The first step is <strong>to</strong> organize<br />

your contact database. To ensure<br />

a good reputation, you should<br />

keep your distribution lists updated<br />

and your e-<strong>mail</strong> relevant.<br />

■ All e-<strong>mail</strong> lists should be opt-in<br />

Ellen Siegel<br />

Constant Contact<br />

only. Let people know they can<br />

easily unsubscribe at any time<br />

and adhere <strong>to</strong> their requests.<br />

■ Moni<strong>to</strong>r your bounces and keep your list up <strong>to</strong> date. Mailing<br />

repeatedly <strong>to</strong> a bounced address can hurt your reputation with an ISP.<br />

The second step in building reputation is exhibiting consistent e<strong>mail</strong><br />

behavior — make sure your recipients understand how often<br />

you’ll send them e-<strong>mail</strong> messages. Additional steps <strong>to</strong> increase successful<br />

delivery include the following:<br />

■ Be sure recipients recognize you as the sender. The name next<br />

<strong>to</strong> your “from” address must be clearly identifiable <strong>to</strong> your subscribers,<br />

bearing in mind that in many cases your company’s<br />

name is more recognizable than those of your employees.<br />

Encourage recipients <strong>to</strong> put your “from address” in their address<br />

book, trusted sender list or approved sender list.<br />

■ Content matters. Help ensure your recipients won’t delete or<br />

report your <strong>mail</strong> by making the subject line clear and relevant.<br />

Also avoid “spammy” words, excess capitalization or use of exclamation<br />

points that may trigger ISP content filters.<br />

■ If you use an e-<strong>mail</strong> service provider, improve your reputation<br />

by making sure they have solid, long-standing relationships with<br />

the major ISPs. If they look good, you look good.<br />

Finally, follow industry best practices. Stand behind your e-<strong>mail</strong><br />

and protect your brand by using e-<strong>mail</strong> authentication. Honor<br />

unsubscribe requests promptly. If you use an ESP, leverage its<br />

expertise and infrastructure in these areas.<br />

By taking these simple steps you will be well on your way <strong>to</strong><br />

developing trusted relationships with your recipients and ensuring<br />

your e-<strong>mail</strong> communications not only make it <strong>to</strong> your intended<br />

contacts’ inboxes, but are also actually read.<br />

Ellen Siegel is the principal technologist at Constant Contact. She can be<br />

reached at esiegel@constantcontact.com.<br />

CAN-SPAM, four years on<br />

BY JEREMY SAIBIL<br />

In December of 2003, President Bush signed the CAN-SPAM<br />

Act in<strong>to</strong> law. The CAN-SPAM Act set rules for sending commercial<br />

e-<strong>mail</strong>, including manda<strong>to</strong>ry inclusion of an opt-out mech-<br />

anism, adding a physical address <strong>to</strong> the message and using a legitimate<br />

subject line.<br />

So four years later, what is the assessment of the CAN-SPAM<br />

Act? Government officials, Internet service providers (ISPs) and<br />

e-<strong>mail</strong> service providers (ESPs) generally agree that the law has<br />

had a positive effect.<br />

Genuine marketers are not seen as major contribu<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> the<br />

SPAM problem. Still, it is a criminal element that continues <strong>to</strong> be<br />

responsible for much of the harmful SPAM being sent <strong>to</strong>day, and<br />

the US government still sees SPAM as a pressing issue and is<br />

focusing on enforcing the law, rather than changing it.<br />

The good, the bad and the evil Let’s start with evil: many<br />

experts agree that an increasing portion of SPAM is related <strong>to</strong> illegal<br />

activities. Some common examples:<br />

■ Pump-and-dump s<strong>to</strong>ck scams<br />

■ Identity theft and fraud<br />

■ Scams (I am the widow of an African dicta<strong>to</strong>r…)<br />

Unfortunately, many people are still falling for these scams and<br />

fuelling the spammers’ fire.<br />

The good: ESPs and ISPs have worked well <strong>to</strong>gether <strong>to</strong> put in<br />

place standards and technology that prevent forged e-<strong>mail</strong> and better<br />

allow recipients <strong>to</strong> manage what <strong>mail</strong> they want <strong>to</strong> receive. In<br />

the past few years, the sender policy framework (SPF), sender ID<br />

and domain keys, (authentication pro<strong>to</strong>cols supported by such<br />

products as Campaigner) have been developed and are now widely<br />

adopted. In another example, ISPs have set up feedback loops with<br />

ESPs so that SPAM complaints<br />

can be transmitted <strong>to</strong> senders in<br />

real time.<br />

Strong authentication <strong>to</strong>ols are<br />

needed <strong>to</strong> establish the reputation<br />

of individual senders. Eventually,<br />

like on eBay, recipients will be<br />

able <strong>to</strong> see a sender’s reputation<br />

before agreeing <strong>to</strong> engage in a<br />

relationship. As a marketer, it is<br />

important <strong>to</strong> start thinking of<br />

Jeremy Saibil<br />

Campaigner<br />

ESSENTIAL GUIDE<br />

your e-<strong>mail</strong> reputation, if you are<br />

not already. Many ISPs are<br />

already providing filtering <strong>to</strong>ols <strong>to</strong><br />

their users. AOL pioneered the “report spam” but<strong>to</strong>n in its <strong>mail</strong><br />

client and others followed. Yahoo has a “this is not junk” but<strong>to</strong>n,<br />

and Hot<strong>mail</strong> is working on a way <strong>to</strong> let people unsubscribe using a<br />

<strong>to</strong>ol in the Hot<strong>mail</strong> interface instead of the link in the message<br />

itself. The trend giving more control <strong>to</strong> recipients is one that will<br />

continue.<br />

This brings us <strong>to</strong> the bad. Some marketers are still not following<br />

all of the best practices put forward by the industry and rules<br />

required by law: Get permission, provide an opt-out, and include a<br />

physical address<br />

Another fac<strong>to</strong>r affecting your reputation is the relevance of your<br />

content. Despite having opt-in status, if you are sending offers<br />

that are only of interest <strong>to</strong> a segment of your list, you may be<br />

receiving complaints. So target your message <strong>to</strong> relevant segments<br />

and spare the rest. Take a common-sense approach and your reputation<br />

will be fine.<br />

Jeremy Saibil is direc<strong>to</strong>r of deliverability at Campaigner. He can be reached at<br />

jsaibil@campaigner.com.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!