tax notes international - Tuck School of Business - Dartmouth College

B, neither Branch A nor Branch B will be treated as a
separate corporation. (See Figure 6.)
Same as in Example 3 (Figure 5 above), except B is 12%
tax. In addition, B and FS in Country country M together provide
demonstrably greater contribution than A.
FS
10%
A B
20%
Tested Mfg
Location
Figure 6
12%
No branch is a
separate corp.
7. Example 5 — Figure 7
The facts are the same as in Example 3 (5. above),
except that selling activities are also performed by
Branch D in Country D, where Country D imposes a
16 percent effective rate of tax on sales income. Also,
the activities of FS located in Country A and Country
M, considered together, provide a demonstrably greater
contribution to the manufacture of Product X than the
activities of employees of FS located in Country B.
The results for the remainder of FS are the same as
in Example 3: A is treated as a separate corporation.
These rules also must be applied regarding Branch
D because it performs selling activities for Product X.
Figure 7
Same as in Example 3 (Figure 5 above) except
Branch D sells.
FS
10% Sells
A B D
20% 24% Sells
16%
SPECIAL REPORTS
Thus, for purposes of that sales income, the location of
Branch D is the tested sales location. The location of
Branch B is the tested manufacturing location because
there is a tax rate disparity between Country D and
Country B, and Branch B is the only branch that
would be treated as a separate corporation. The manufacturing
activities performed in Country M by the remainder
of FS and the manufacturing activities performed
in Country A by Branch A will be included in
Branch D’s contribution to the manufacture of Product
X for purposes of determining the location of manufacture
of Product X regarding Branch D’s sales income.
Branch D, Branch A, and the remainder of FS,
considered together, provide a demonstrably greater
contribution to the manufacture of Product X than the
activities of Branch B. Therefore, the branch rules will
not apply to Branch D, and neither Branch A nor
Branch D will be treated as a separate corporation.
(See Figure 7.)
8. Example 6 — Figure 8
FS purchases from a related person raw materials
that are manufactured into Product X by an unrelated
contract manufacturer (CM). CM physically manufactures
the goods in Country C. Employees of FS located
in Country M sell Product X to unrelated persons
for use outside Country M.
Employees of FS located in Country M engage in
product design, manage the manufacturing costs and
capabilities for Product X, and direct the use of intellectual
property for purposes of manufacturing Product
X. Quality control and oversight and direction of the
manufacturing process are conducted in Country C by
employees of FS who are located in Country M but
who regularly travel to Country X. Branch A is the
only branch of FS. Product design for Product X conducted
by employees of FS located in Country A are
supplemental to the bulk of the design work, which is
done by employees of FS located in Country M. At all
times, employees of Branch A control the raw materials,
work-in-process, and finished goods. Employees of
FS located in Country A also control manufacturingrelated
logistics for Product X. Country M imposes an
effective rate of tax on sales income of 10 percent.
Country A imposes an effective rate of tax on sales
income of 20 percent. Neither the remainder of FS nor
Branch A independently satisfies the manufacturing
test, although FS as a whole provides a substantial
contribution to the manufactured Product X.
The tested sales location is Country M because the
remainder of FS performs the selling activities regarding
Product X. The tested manufacturing location is
the location of Branch A because there is a tax rate
disparity, and Branch A is the only branch that would
be treated as a separate corporation. Although the activities
of traveling employees are considered in determining
whether FS as a whole makes a substantial
contribution, the activities of the employees of FS that
TAX NOTES INTERNATIONAL FEBRUARY 2, 2009 • 457
(C) Tax Analysts 2009. All rights reserved. Tax Analysts does not claim copyright in any public domain or third party content.