21.07.2013 Views

tax notes international - Tuck School of Business - Dartmouth College

tax notes international - Tuck School of Business - Dartmouth College

tax notes international - Tuck School of Business - Dartmouth College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

dependent agent on behalf <strong>of</strong> the nonresident enterprise,<br />

together with sufficient capital to support those<br />

assets and risks. Therefore, the authorized OECD approach<br />

is the only one that leads to an outcome that is<br />

coherent with the fiction <strong>of</strong> independence provided in<br />

article 7(2).<br />

Furthermore, there is no reason why the attribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>its to an agency PE should be treated differently<br />

than the attribution <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>its to other types <strong>of</strong> PEs.<br />

The adoption <strong>of</strong> the single <strong>tax</strong>payer approach results in<br />

applying the OECD approach in different manners depending<br />

on what type <strong>of</strong> PE is involved, which is<br />

clearly unreasonable.<br />

Also, the adoption <strong>of</strong> the single <strong>tax</strong>payer approach<br />

would make article 5(5) <strong>of</strong> the OECD model superfluous,<br />

which is against one <strong>of</strong> the main principles that<br />

guides the legal interpretation process — that the law<br />

does not have useless words.<br />

Finally, considerations <strong>of</strong> a practical nature should<br />

not overcome a legal interpretation that is harmonious<br />

with the wording <strong>of</strong> the legal text, and is the reason<br />

why the authorized OECD approach should prevail<br />

over the single <strong>tax</strong>payer approach, even if the former<br />

may be a more difficult application in practice.<br />

SPECIAL REPORTS<br />

The analysis <strong>of</strong> the relevant case law shows that attribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>its to PEs is still a controversial issue,<br />

although a trend towards the adoption <strong>of</strong> the authorized<br />

OECD approach can be seen.<br />

Moreover, the criticisms <strong>of</strong> the application <strong>of</strong> the<br />

authorized OECD approach to treaties currently in<br />

force are somehow weakened as the OECD Committee<br />

on Fiscal Affairs adopted, at its meeting <strong>of</strong> June 24-25,<br />

2008, the revised commentary on the current article 7<br />

<strong>of</strong> the OECD model and included it in the 2008 update<br />

to the model.<br />

Tax practice shows that there will always be room<br />

to discuss the legal status <strong>of</strong> the OECD commentary<br />

as well as the historical debate between the static and<br />

ambulatory interpretation <strong>of</strong> the commentary.<br />

Therefore, the states that concluded OECDpatterned<br />

treaties should put all their efforts into implementing<br />

the necessary changes to adopt the authorized<br />

OECD approach because only a uniform interpretation<br />

<strong>of</strong> article 7 <strong>of</strong> the OECD model among the states can<br />

ensure that no double <strong>tax</strong>ation will arise, greatly benefiting<br />

cross-border trade. ◆<br />

TAX NOTES INTERNATIONAL FEBRUARY 2, 2009 • 445<br />

(C) Tax Analysts 2009. All rights reserved. Tax Analysts does not claim copyright in any public domain or third party content.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!