HIGHLIGHTS Reported Accumulated Foreign Pr<strong>of</strong>its and Jobs Act Repatriations <strong>of</strong> 40 U.S. Multinational Corporations, 1996-2008 (millions <strong>of</strong> dollars) Jobs Act Repatria- Company Company Fiscal Year tion Amount 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1,200 General Electric - 62,000 47,000 36,000 29,000 21,000 15,000 * * * * * * 37,000 Pfizer - 60,000 41,000 27,000 51,600 38,000 29,000 18,000 14,000 8,200 6,500 4,500 3,900 - Exxon Mobil - 56,000 47,000 41,000 25,000 22,000 17,000 17,000 14,000 11,100 8,400 6,600 6,200 - American International Group - 21,200 17,600 13,800 7,000 6,500 5,100 4,500 3,500 3,100 3,300 2,900 3,100 3,200 Citigroup - 21,100 14,700 10,600 10,000 5,800 3,200 2,000 1,500 1,300 1,300 1,300 * - ChevronTexaco - 20,557 21,035 14,317 10,000 10,541 10,108 9,003 8,544 8,002 7,958 7,900 7,420 9,500 IBM - 18,800 14,200 10,100 19,644 18,120 16,631 16,851 15,472 14,900 13,165 12,511 12,111 15,900 Merck - 17,200 12,500 8,300 20,100 18,000 15,000 12,400 9,700 7,500 5,800 6,600 5,400 7,200 Procter & Gamble 21,000 17,000 16,000 10,300 16,750 14,021 10,698 9,231 8,828 7,764 6,739 6,108 5,078 1,200 Cisco Systems 21,900 16,300 11,100 6,800 4,300 2,500 1,200 707 411 133 * * * 7,500 PepsiCo - 14,700 10,800 7,500 11,900 8,800 7,500 * * * * * 4,000 9,000 Bristol-Myers- Squibb - 14,100 11,300 8,400 16,900 12,600 9,000 8,800 6,000 4,400 3,200 2,600 2,506 1,800 Merrill Lynch - 13,000 9,800 7,700 8,100 5,900 4,300 4,800 3,700 3,300 2,230 1,645 1,206 4,300 Abbott Laboratories - 12,330 7,320 5,800 7,900 5,194 4,304 4,681 2,432 1,980 1,818 1,549 1,312 2,700 Wyeth - 12,060 9,420 7,480 8,790 6,435 6,000 * * * * * * 6,100 Coca-Cola - 11,900 7,700 5,100 9,800 8,200 6,100 5,900 3,700 3,400 3,600 1,917 542 5,500 Altria Group - 11,000 11,000 9,300 11,800 8,600 7,100 5,600 4,700 5,800 3,400 3,000 4,200 9,100 DuPont - 9,644 7,866 7,031 13,865 13,464 10,320 9,106 8,865 6,666 5,996 7,007 5,928 8,000 Eli Lilly - 8,790 5,700 4,100 2,800 9,500 8,000 6,400 5,200 2,610 1,010 115 1,833 - Alcoa - 8,753 8,470 7,562 7,248 6,154 5,893 4,399 3,861 1,838 1,528 1,389 1,115 - Walmart Stores 10,700 8,700 6,800 5,300 4,000 2,141 1,000 722 * * * * * 4,100 Dell 10,800 7,900 5,700 2,900 5,100 4,100 711 492 541 263 127 97 70 14,500 Hewlett-Packard 12,900 7,700 3,100 1,200 15,000 14,400 14,500 13,200 11,500 9,000 7,100 5,200 3,800 - Xerox - 7,500 7,000 3,900 6,000 5,000 5,000 3,400 5,000 4,900 4,700 4,500 3,900 6,200 Intel - 6,300 4,900 3,700 7,900 7,000 6,300 5,500 4,200 2,200 2,200 1,505 992 780 Micros<strong>of</strong>t 7,500 6,100 n.a. 4,100 2,300 1,640 780 * * * * * * 9,400 Schering-Plough - 5,800 4,200 3,100 2,200 11,100 9,400 7,600 6,400 5,020 3,475 2,850 2,119 4,000 Morgan Stanley - 5,800 4,400 3,900 5,800 4,900 4,000 4,700 4,300 3,100 2,600 2,200 * - Goldman Sachs Group - 4,970 2,900 2,400 1,650 1,100 209 * * * * * * - American Express - 4,900 3,900 3,200 2,700 2,900 2,400 2,100 1,900 1,600 1,200 873 677 - Conoco Phillips - 4,381 3,597 2,773 2,091 2,046 2,171 1,687 1,661 Merger 2,700 Honeywell International - 4,100 2,900 2,100 3,900 3,300 2,200 2,000 2,100 1,600 552 355 326 4,600 Motorola - 4,100 4,000 2,800 5,600 6,100 7,600 7,100 7,900 * * * * 2,100 International Paper - 3,700 2,700 2,400 2,700 3,300 2,500 1,800 1,800 1,200 1,100 555 361 1,900 J.P. Morgan Chase Co. - 3,400 1,900 1,500 2,600 2,300 1,900 1,667 1,404 1,054 764 * 755 Apple 3,800 2,400 823 1,200 972 822 755 755 755 520 437 395 395 1,290 Texas Instruments - 1,620 1,290 1,010 2,034 1,604 1,293 * * * 620 870 760 - Viacom - 939 457 351 155 2,000 1,900 1,600 1,600 1,400 1,500 1,500 1,300 2,200 Verizon - 900 3,000 3,000 5,100 3,400 4,500 4,000 3,600 Merger 1,100 Weyerhaeuser - 357 828 1,300 1,700 1,300 1,100 972 1,259 993 789 827 792 Note: * indicates information not available. Source: Company annual reports. TAX NOTES INTERNATIONAL FEBRUARY 2, 2009 • 379 (C) Tax Analysts 2009. All rights reserved. Tax Analysts does not claim copyright in any public domain or third party content.
HIGHLIGHTS U.S. Widens Investigation <strong>of</strong> Swiss Bank by Randall Jackson U.S. prosecutors reportedly are expanding their investigation <strong>of</strong> the actions <strong>of</strong> UBS AG, the Swiss banking giant that has been accused <strong>of</strong> helping its U.S. clients conceal <strong>tax</strong>able assets. Officials are looking into the possibility that the bank helped tens <strong>of</strong> thousands <strong>of</strong> U.S. <strong>tax</strong>payers hide income in <strong>of</strong>fshore accounts. New evidence reportedly has led investigators to believe that the original estimate that UBS helped about 17,000 U.S. residents evade <strong>tax</strong>es may be too low and that thousands <strong>of</strong> previously unknown accounts may exist. Investigators now are looking into whether previously unidentified investment vehicles may have been used and whether divisions <strong>of</strong> the bank in addition to the previously targeted wealth management section may have been involved, according to a January 26 Wall Street Journal report. The talk <strong>of</strong> additional illegal activity comes close on the heels <strong>of</strong> a January 13 order declaring former UBS <strong>of</strong>ficial Raoul Weil a fugitive. Weil failed to surrender to U.S. authorities after the November 12, 2008, unsealing <strong>of</strong> an indictment charging him with conspiring to defraud the U.S. government. (For prior coverage, see Tax Notes Int’l, Jan. 26, 2009, p. 307, Doc 2009-856, or 2009 WTD 10-1.) Weil was head <strong>of</strong> the <strong>international</strong> portion <strong>of</strong> UBS’s wealth management division from 2002 to 2007 and was appointed chair and CEO <strong>of</strong> the bank’s global wealth management and business banking division on July 6, 2007. Peter Kurer, who was appointed chair <strong>of</strong> UBS on April 23, 2008, told investors in a January 15 presentation that the bank’s key goals for 2009 include reaching a settlement with the U.S. Justice Department and ensuring the ‘‘recovery <strong>of</strong> UBS’s reputation,’’ according to the Wall Street Journal report. UBS is at the center <strong>of</strong> both criminal and civil investigations in the United States and reportedly is hoping to avoid felony indictments through ongoing talks with the Justice Department. Unnamed sources close to the discussions say UBS <strong>of</strong>ficials have <strong>of</strong>fered to confess to criminal activity and pay a fine in the neighborhood <strong>of</strong> $1.2 billion as part <strong>of</strong> a deal. In the civil case, the Justice Department and the IRS reportedly are contemplating an additional, perhaps more comprehensive, summons aimed at forcing UBS to turn over the names <strong>of</strong> American account holders. On July 1, 2008, a federal judge in Miami issued a John Doe summons requiring the bank to disclose the U.S. account holders’ names. However, UBS has thus far failed to comply. Unnamed individuals involved in the case say UBS’s best hope appears to be a resolution <strong>of</strong> the criminal case while the civil case continues. Furthermore, any deal is likely to be between the U.S. government and UBS, and will not include the American <strong>tax</strong>payers allegedly involved. ‘‘It’s my impression that whatever the settlement is between the bank and the U.S. government, this will not legally impact the <strong>tax</strong>ability or non-<strong>tax</strong>ability <strong>of</strong> the bank’s customers,’’ William M. Sharp Sr., a Tampa <strong>tax</strong> attorney with UBS clients, said in the Journal report. The criminal case has proven particularly damaging to UBS as it tries to cope with the global financial crisis. In October 2008 the bank reportedly required a $60 billion bailout from the Swiss government to stay afloat. ♦ Randall Jackson is a legal reporter with Tax Notes International. E-mail: rjackson@<strong>tax</strong>.org 380 • FEBRUARY 2, 2009 TAX NOTES INTERNATIONAL (C) Tax Analysts 2009. All rights reserved. Tax Analysts does not claim copyright in any public domain or third party content.
- Page 1 and 2: tax notes international Volume 53,
- Page 3 and 4: ARGENTINA 387 Buenos Aires’ New S
- Page 5 and 6: President and Publisher: Christophe
- Page 7 and 8: HIGHLIGHTS from the tax accounts in
- Page 9 and 10: HIGHLIGHTS However, if the firm rec
- Page 11 and 12: HIGHLIGHTS NEWS ANALYSIS Multinatio
- Page 13: HIGHLIGHTS check by full tax on any
- Page 17 and 18: HIGHLIGHTS is required to withhold
- Page 19 and 20: HIGHLIGHTS by a Canadian taxpayer a
- Page 21 and 22: HIGHLIGHTS Personal Tax Measures Th
- Page 23 and 24: ARGENTINA the most significant exem
- Page 25 and 26: CHINA (P.R.C.) On December 16, 2008
- Page 27 and 28: EUROPEAN UNION ensure that there is
- Page 29 and 30: GERMANY confessed to his wrongdoing
- Page 31 and 32: INDIA Addressing the assessee’s d
- Page 33 and 34: INDONESIA As of January 1 and conti
- Page 35 and 36: JAPAN insistence that the bill incl
- Page 37 and 38: OECD OECD OECD Group Addresses CIVs
- Page 39 and 40: OECD Furthermore, a source country
- Page 41 and 42: PORTUGAL Extension of Portuguese Ho
- Page 43 and 44: SPAIN tax authorities interpret the
- Page 45 and 46: 410 • FEBRUARY 2, 2009 TAX NOTES
- Page 47 and 48: FEATURED PERSPECTIVES We, the taxpa
- Page 49 and 50: FEATURED PERSPECTIVES he has to pay
- Page 51 and 52: BOOK REVIEW smaller government. But
- Page 53 and 54: 418 • FEBRUARY 2, 2009 TAX NOTES
- Page 55 and 56: PRACTITIONERS’ CORNER for German
- Page 57 and 58: SPECIAL REPORTS reports were of the
- Page 59 and 60: SPECIAL REPORTS that either avoids
- Page 61 and 62: SPECIAL REPORTS U.S. Germany Switze
- Page 63 and 64: SPECIAL REPORTS The operations carr
- Page 65 and 66:
SPECIAL REPORTS the profits that ma
- Page 67 and 68:
SPECIAL REPORTS In essence, the fir
- Page 69 and 70:
SPECIAL REPORTS Figure 6. Single Ta
- Page 71 and 72:
SPECIAL REPORTS Table 1. Comparison
- Page 73 and 74:
SPECIAL REPORTS Singapore India pre
- Page 75 and 76:
SPECIAL REPORTS such a case, the tr
- Page 77 and 78:
SPECIAL REPORTS If the single taxpa
- Page 79 and 80:
SPECIAL REPORTS agent would be as i
- Page 81 and 82:
446 • FEBRUARY 2, 2009 TAX NOTES
- Page 83 and 84:
SPECIAL REPORTS create unintended b
- Page 85 and 86:
SPECIAL REPORTS country of organiza
- Page 87 and 88:
SPECIAL REPORTS regulations make cl
- Page 89 and 90:
SPECIAL REPORTS manufacturing is th
- Page 91 and 92:
SPECIAL REPORTS FS A B C Designs X
- Page 93 and 94:
SPECIAL REPORTS are performed in Co
- Page 95 and 96:
SPECIAL REPORTS the intangible deve
- Page 97 and 98:
SPECIAL REPORTS In Example 3, the f
- Page 99 and 100:
SPECIAL REPORTS The investor model
- Page 101 and 102:
SPECIAL REPORTS The licensing alter
- Page 103 and 104:
SPECIAL REPORTS The second exceptio
- Page 105 and 106:
SPECIAL REPORTS provides the most r
- Page 107 and 108:
SPECIAL REPORTS The taxpayer assert
- Page 109 and 110:
SPECIAL REPORTS the elimination of
- Page 111 and 112:
TAX CALENDAR financially distressed
- Page 113:
Africa: Zein Kebonang Albania: Adri