21.07.2013 Views

I MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE SESSION j of - Michigan State ...

I MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE SESSION j of - Michigan State ...

I MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE SESSION j of - Michigan State ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Enrollment<br />

restrictions<br />

winter and<br />

spring terms<br />

1976 and fall<br />

term 1976<br />

approved<br />

D. O<strong>THE</strong>R ITEMS FOR ACTION, continued September 26, 1975<br />

Provost Cantlon explained that from 1969 through 1973 the University had maintained<br />

a steady enrollment rate <strong>of</strong> approximately 41,000 and in 1974 this rate,<br />

without any change in admissions, increased to 43,459. This increase is due to<br />

the returning rate <strong>of</strong> students who would, under normal economic conditions, be<br />

dropping out to take jobs. It is felt that this rising enrollment cannot be<br />

allowed to continue because the Legislature does not appropriate additional<br />

money for the additional students, the quality <strong>of</strong> education is diluted, and<br />

the physical facilities and support system <strong>of</strong> the University cannot withstand<br />

the added strain. It was recommended, therefore, that the Trustees direct the<br />

Administration to regulate for an enrollment objective as opposed to an admissions<br />

objective. It is anticipated that the enrollment on the 10th day <strong>of</strong><br />

classes fall term 1975 will be 44,522 students.<br />

The first <strong>of</strong> two proposals presented by Provost Cantlon was that the Admissions<br />

Office be given permission to reduce the input <strong>of</strong> new students during winter<br />

term and spring term 1976 by from 250 to 300 students.<br />

JMotion was made by Trustee Carrigan, seconded by Trustee Stevens to approve this<br />

"•NT^ "<br />

[proposal. Motion carried by a vote <strong>of</strong> 7 to 1, Trustee Huff voting ."No.<br />

The second proposal was that the fall 1976 enrollment be held to 43,500 students,<br />

(Motion was made by Trustee Stack, seconded by Trustee Carrigan to approve this pro-<br />

t!-\T ' IT<br />

iposal. Motion carried by a vote <strong>of</strong> 7 to 1, Trustee Huff voting "No,<br />

1975-76 budgets | 9. in accordance with the guidelines adopted at the August 20, 1975 Board meeting, the<br />

approved | following 1975-76 budgets are recommended for approval.<br />

a. UNIVERSITY GENERAL<br />

<strong>State</strong> Appropriation<br />

Federal Funds :<br />

Morrill-Nelson<br />

Estimated Revenues<br />

University Funds:<br />

Student Fees $41,057,607<br />

Application Fees 540,000<br />

Departmental Receipts 1,238,000<br />

Interest Income<br />

Recovery on Research<br />

1,400,000<br />

Contracts 4,700,000<br />

Equity 636,000<br />

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE<br />

Estimated Revenues<br />

Federal:<br />

Smith-Lever Amended<br />

(Requires matching) $ 4,237,699<br />

Federal Retirement 474,300<br />

Nutrition Education 1,505,209<br />

$ 88,635,893 Salaries<br />

250,000<br />

49,571,607<br />

Rural Development 42,727 $ 6,259,935<br />

<strong>State</strong> Appropriations 6,628,625<br />

Labor<br />

Estimated Expenditures<br />

Supplies & Services<br />

Equipment<br />

$97,168,709<br />

10,095,470<br />

28,629,810<br />

2,563,511<br />

$138,457,500 $138,457,500<br />

$ 12,888,560<br />

Estimated Expenditures<br />

Salaries $ 9,130,542<br />

Fringe Benefits 1,250,000 $ 10,380,542<br />

Travel &<br />

Maintenance 2,508,018<br />

$12,888,560<br />

•—continued—

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!