20.07.2013 Views

"Chapter 1 - The Op Amp's Place in the World" - HTL Wien 10

"Chapter 1 - The Op Amp's Place in the World" - HTL Wien 10

"Chapter 1 - The Op Amp's Place in the World" - HTL Wien 10

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PCB Mechanical Construction<br />

17.2.2.3 Multi-Layer<br />

17-6<br />

Double-sided boards, <strong>in</strong> spite of <strong>the</strong>ir benefits, are not <strong>the</strong> best method of construction,<br />

especially for sensitive or high-speed designs. <strong>The</strong> most common board thickness is<br />

1.5 mm. This separation is too great for full realization of some of <strong>the</strong> benefits listed above.<br />

Distributed capacitance, for example, is very low due to <strong>the</strong> separation.<br />

Critical designs call for multi-layer boards. Some of <strong>the</strong> reasons are obvious:<br />

Better rout<strong>in</strong>g for power as well as ground connections. If <strong>the</strong> power is also on a<br />

plane, it is available to all po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> circuit simply by add<strong>in</strong>g vias.<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r layers are available for signal rout<strong>in</strong>g, mak<strong>in</strong>g rout<strong>in</strong>g easier.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re will be distributed capacitance between <strong>the</strong> power and ground planes,<br />

reduc<strong>in</strong>g high frequency noise.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are o<strong>the</strong>r reasons for multi-layer boards, however, that may not be obvious or <strong>in</strong>tuitive.<br />

Better EMI/RFI rejection. <strong>The</strong>re is due to <strong>the</strong> image plane effect, which has been<br />

known s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> time of Marconi. When a conductor is placed close to a parallel<br />

conductive surface, most of <strong>the</strong> high frequency currents will return directly under <strong>the</strong><br />

conductor, flow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> opposite direction. This mirror image of <strong>the</strong> conductor<br />

with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> plane creates a transmission l<strong>in</strong>e. S<strong>in</strong>ce currents are equal and opposite<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> transmission l<strong>in</strong>e, it is relatively immune to radiated noise. It also couples <strong>the</strong><br />

signal very efficiently. <strong>The</strong> image plane effect works equally well with ground and<br />

power planes, but <strong>the</strong>y must be cont<strong>in</strong>uous. Any gap or discont<strong>in</strong>uity causes <strong>the</strong><br />

beneficial effects to quickly vanish. <strong>The</strong>re is more on this <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

paragraphs.<br />

Reduced overall project cost for small production runs. Although multi-layer boards<br />

are more expensive to manufacture, EMI/RFI requirements from <strong>the</strong> FCC or o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

agencies may require expensive test<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> design. If <strong>the</strong>re are problems, it can<br />

force a complete redesign of <strong>the</strong> PCB, lead<strong>in</strong>g to additional rounds of test<strong>in</strong>g. A<br />

multi-layer PCB can have as much as 20-dB better EMI/RFI performance over a<br />

2-layer PCB. If production volumes are go<strong>in</strong>g to be small, it makes sense to make<br />

a better PCB to beg<strong>in</strong> with, than try to cut costs and take <strong>the</strong> risk of fail<strong>in</strong>g $25,000<br />

to $50,000 tests.<br />

17.2.3 Board Stack-Up — <strong>The</strong> Order of Layers<br />

<strong>The</strong>re has been a lot of confusion <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> past over what is <strong>the</strong> optimum order for PCB<br />

layers. Take, for example, a 4-layer board consist<strong>in</strong>g of two signal layers, a power plane,<br />

and a ground plane. Is it better to route <strong>the</strong> signal traces between <strong>the</strong> layers, thus provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

shield<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong> signal traces – or is it better to make <strong>the</strong> ground and power planes<br />

<strong>the</strong> two <strong>in</strong>ner planes?<br />

In consider<strong>in</strong>g this question, it is important to remember that no matter what is decided,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re will still be signals exposed on one or both of <strong>the</strong> top and bottom planes. <strong>The</strong> leads<br />

of <strong>the</strong> op amp PCB package, and <strong>the</strong> traces on <strong>the</strong> board lead<strong>in</strong>g to nearby passive com-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!