463 Mass. 353 - Appellee Commonwealth Brief - Mass Cases
463 Mass. 353 - Appellee Commonwealth Brief - Mass Cases
463 Mass. 353 - Appellee Commonwealth Brief - Mass Cases
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Blake, 413 <strong>Mass</strong>. 823, 828 (1992).<br />
Nexus<br />
The search warrant application also provided a<br />
sufficient nexus between drug activity and the Mendes<br />
apartment. The legal standards here are also well<br />
understood. Sufficient nexus between the crime and the<br />
location to be searched may be found in the type of<br />
crime, the nature of the items sought, the suspect's<br />
ability to conceal such items, and normal inferences as<br />
to where a defendant would hide these items.<br />
<strong>Commonwealth</strong> v. Cinelli, 389 <strong>Mass</strong>. 197, 213 (1983).<br />
Here, the affidavit stated that CSA personally<br />
observed the defendants conduct over twenty cocaine and<br />
marijuana sales within their apartment. (I.R.A. 6.)<br />
CSA saw that the defendants weighed and packaged the<br />
cocaine within the confines of their residence and<br />
provided information about where a digital scale was<br />
stored. (I.R.A. 7.) CSA also gave information about<br />
where the drugs would be found within the home, stating<br />
that Raymond Mendes stored cocaine in his bedroom<br />
closet, that Ronald Mendes stored marijuana inside of<br />
his bedroom, and that a large amount of cocaine was in<br />
the basement. (I.R.A. 6-7.) This information,<br />
together with the two police-observed controlled buys<br />
20