You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Statement of Issues Presented for Review<br />
I. Did the Trial <strong>Court</strong> err in upholding t.he<br />
H ou f; ing Appca 1 s Conmi t t e e where D e i end ant.<br />
Htt i Lash Views, LLC hLlS failed to<br />
demonvLrate that. thc conditions jrnpos~ci by<br />
the Flajntiif Hoard of Appcals make the<br />
project. uneconomic'?<br />
Statement of the Case<br />
This is an appeal by Plaintiff Zoning Hoard of<br />
Appeals of .the Ci.ty of Kmesbury ("Board") from a<br />
Decision by t.he Superi.or <strong>Court</strong> denying its Motion for<br />
J;idg~ricnt on the Pl.eadings in an appeal under G. L. c.<br />
30A from a dccisj.on of the Ilousinq Appea1.s Committee<br />
("HAC" or "Committee") I<br />
Thc<br />
HAC: decision qraIiLed the<br />
re1 i ef sought by developer Attitash Views, LLC<br />
("Attitash" ~nr "developer") in iLs appeal irom a<br />
decision by the Board grant; ng a comprehcr-isive permit<br />
wiLh conditions<br />
The HAC decision directed t.he Hoard issue ci<br />
comprehensive permit for fhe 40 clwclling units<br />
approved by the Board and, inter alia, ordered struck<br />
numerous condi t.ions imposcid by the Board. The Board<br />
respectfully requests that thl s <strong>Court</strong> reverse the<br />
Decision of thc Superior <strong>Court</strong> aid rule thal the IIAC's
Change language