Supreme Judicial Court - Mass Cases
Supreme Judicial Court - Mass Cases Supreme Judicial Court - Mass Cases
(Housiriy Appeals Cnmm., January 76, 20041 Statutes : G.L. c. 30A, s. 14 G.1,. C. 40B, s . 20-23 G.1,. c. 44, s . 53C Regulations: '760 CMH 30.07(4) 760 CMR 31.05(3) 760 CMR 31.06(3) 760 CMR 31.06(7) 760 CMR 31..06(9) 760 CMR 31.W/ (1) (f) V 12 passim passim 45,46, 4') 5,1R 19 6 7,8,13,17 -/, 11,12,18,21,36,37 7 11,1.4,30
Statement of Issues Presented for Review I. Did the Trial Court err in upholding t.he H ou f; ing Appca 1 s Conmi t t e e where D e i end ant. Htt i Lash Views, LLC hLlS failed to demonvLrate that. thc conditions jrnpos~ci by the Flajntiif Hoard of Appcals make the project. uneconomic'? Statement of the Case This is an appeal by Plaintiff Zoning Hoard of Appeals of .the Ci.ty of Kmesbury ("Board") from a Decision by t.he Superi.or Court denying its Motion for J;idg~ricnt on the Pl.eadings in an appeal under G. L. c. 30A from a dccisj.on of the Ilousinq Appea1.s Committee ("HAC" or "Committee") I Thc HAC: decision qraIiLed the re1 i ef sought by developer Attitash Views, LLC ("Attitash" ~nr "developer") in iLs appeal irom a decision by the Board grant; ng a comprehcr-isive permit wiLh conditions The HAC decision directed t.he Hoard issue ci comprehensive permit for fhe 40 clwclling units approved by the Board and, inter alia, ordered struck numerous condi t.ions imposcid by the Board. The Board respectfully requests that thl s Court reverse the Decision of thc Superior Court aid rule thal the IIAC's
- Page 1 and 2: ... COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS S
- Page 3 and 4: C. Ucfendant Attitash Views, W C fa
- Page 5: 0 0 r) I. * a 0 Simiuns v. Clcrk-Ma
- Page 9 and 10: Decision. Ttic Fresidj-nq Of fic.cr
- Page 11 and 12: I'roced~irc Act. See G.L.r: . 4I)D,
- Page 13 and 14: t.o decide this case hy summary dec
- Page 15 and 16: sucii hr>usi.ng uricconomj.r: 2nd w
- Page 17 and 18: cniirli tioris imposed by ?.he boar
- Page 19 and 20: (3 f c h Lhe HAC: in t.hat one at.
- Page 21 and 22: showing that 1) iC reqi.iested a wa
- Page 23 and 24: iiny such condiLion. The HAC is a h
- Page 25 and 26: 0 0 0 a 0 a comprehensive pcrmit. a
- Page 27 and 28: 'The HAC frames t.his care as prese
- Page 29 and 30: 'The board of appeals shall request
- Page 31 and 32: 111. The Trial CourL ... jmproperly
- Page 33 and 34: . . .. specific statute that. the L
- Page 35 and 36: e 0 rn a a rn 0 Conunittee on Urban
- Page 37 and 38: 0 and Reqiil atory Agreement. tc; b
- Page 39 and 40: document.s may be inconsi .?tent wi
- Page 41 and 42: for cost. certification arid sugges
- Page 43 and 44: 0 e e e e e 0 a Inat L c r s ; res
- Page 45 and 46: characterizing them as ":juperflwus
- Page 47 and 48: and the Tr;.al CourL erred in uphol
- Page 49 and 50: the Hoard WAS wilhj.n its aiuthoril
- Page 51 and 52: CommiLlee’s authority and the TT-
- Page 53 and 54: propriety of 53G iunds, tho SJC sta
(Housiriy Appeals Cnmm., January 76, 20041<br />
Statutes :<br />
G.L. c. 30A, s. 14<br />
G.1,. C. 40B, s . 20-23<br />
G.1,. c. 44, s . 53C<br />
Regulations:<br />
'760 CMH 30.07(4)<br />
760 CMR 31.05(3)<br />
760 CMR 31.06(3)<br />
760 CMR 31.06(7)<br />
760 CMR 31..06(9)<br />
760 CMR 31.W/ (1) (f)<br />
V<br />
12<br />
passim<br />
passim<br />
45,46, 4')<br />
5,1R 19<br />
6<br />
7,8,13,17<br />
-/, 11,12,18,21,36,37<br />
7<br />
11,1.4,30
Change language