20.07.2013 Views

Supreme Judicial Court - Mass Cases

Supreme Judicial Court - Mass Cases

Supreme Judicial Court - Mass Cases

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

characterizing them as ":juperflwus"; "attempt [ s] to<br />

interj cct the Board iritu thc review and compliance<br />

process" and "impropcrly iriLerfere linyi w i t h rnatLcr,3<br />

within the proviricc of the suhsidizirig aycricy. " RA<br />

Vol. 1, 466. The IlAC stated,. apparcnlly wiLhout. irony,<br />

thaL "[tlhere is no area of policy Ltiialyois or project<br />

review thaL is more squarely wit.lij.11 the expertise ui<br />

<strong>Mass</strong>lluusing than the financi.al analysis of each<br />

pro'ject for which i L provides furidiriy." RA Vol.3, 465.<br />

As discussed above (and miply documented by the<br />

Inspector Gener;il), as a resull of past. failures wiLh<br />

regard tu oversight obligaLions for New Enylarid Fund<br />

and Housing :;tarts projects, "rcpurled deve oper<br />

pr0fit.s were routinely and subslantiall y understated, "<br />

\I '<br />

rcsultj.nq 111 many cases . . . [in] profit windfalls<br />

to t.he developers which dcprived the respective<br />

muni cipalitics of the excess pr0fj.t.s that should have<br />

been paid t.o the 1riuriicipal.i ty uridcr Lhe regul.at.nry<br />

agreements. " R4 Vol .I, 233.<br />

Equally importantly, Lhc HAC'S assertions uf<br />

<strong>Mass</strong>Housiny' B supremacy arid preemptj-ve authority art-<br />

unLounded. Not.hinq iri C.L. c. 4UB or iippli.cab1.P<br />

regu1at.j ons prohibits the Hoard from imposinq<br />

cond

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!