You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
t.o decide this case hy summary decision "since 't.heI-e<br />
is no qeniii.ne issue as to m y niaLeria1 LacL." R4<br />
Vol.1, 462, quoLiriy '760 CMR 30.0714). The HAC<br />
con L inucd :<br />
"In t.his case t.here j s. no di spiite with rreqard t.o<br />
what conditions were imposed by the Board since<br />
they appear clearly in the writicri decision<br />
rendered hy the L3oa1-d. LhaL in, Lhc Board's<br />
Decision or1 ApplicaLion for Comprehensive Permit<br />
. . . . . ThcrcIorc the most appropriat.e way to<br />
address khc developer's legal. chal 1 enqes t.o the<br />
conditions is by summary deci si on. " - 'I d.<br />
Such ruling was in error, where the IlAC<br />
improper1.y equates the "facts" oL Chis case wiLh Che<br />
"cunditi.ons" imposed by the Board. Although the HAC<br />
is correct that there is "no dispute wlth reqard t.o<br />
what conditions were imposed by the Hoard," t-his does<br />
riot mean that there is "no genuiric issue as to ariy<br />
material fact." See 760 CMR 30.07(4). The - LacLs . in<br />
this case extend bcyond the mere exi-stence of t.he<br />
coiiditions in thc Budrd* n Decision. Where Attitash has<br />
~ippealcd an approval with conditions, the issue before<br />
the HAC is whether such conditions "makc tiic<br />
construct.ion or operation of such housing unecorioriiic<br />
and whether t.hey are cnnsi.stent wi t.h 1 oca]. needs. "<br />
G.L. c. 40H, s. 2%. Thus, t.he "material. facts" j.n<br />
this case Lire those Lacts Chat .Lend Lo t;how that thc
Change language