NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases

However, the defendant was not released until
the Middlesex Superior Court Probation Department
installed the GPS rnon'itoring base unit at defendant's
home, and attached the GPS ankle bracelet and trans-.
ponder to the defendant's person (R.A. "13", n. 164),
pursuant to G.L.c. 265, 5 47. -(Addendum, p. i)
The defendant,€iled numerous motions challenging
the imposition of the GPS monitoring, device as a
condition o€ his release, .pursuant to G.L.c. 276, 8
47 (R,A. "13", n. 163, 167, and 168; R.A. "25-30";
R.A. "33-35"; and B.A. "36-38"). And at all times,
the defendant objected t o the imposition of the
GPS monitoring device,, and complained to the court
that he was - not a convicted sex offender, as required
by G.L.c. 276, $47. Cf. Commonwealth v. Cory, 454
Mass. 559 (2009); Commonwealth v.. Vallejo, 455 Mass.
72 (2009): and Commonwealth v. Blake, 454 Mass. 267
(2009) (Adjudicated a sexual dangerous person).
The defendant endured constant harassment,
bullying, ridicule, humiliation, and ostracization
as being mislabeled as'an infamous "sex offender"
I,
and sexual predator" due to observations of the
GPS monitoring bracelet and transponder, Similarly,
this Court has said that the sex registry require-
ment "presents an importantly distinct kind of
30