20.07.2013 Views

NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases

NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases

NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

placed on probation prior to trial and prior to<br />

conviction or entry of a plea of guilty or admission<br />

to facts sufficient for a finding of guilty." Emphasis<br />

added. Emelio, supra at 1024. Also of significant<br />

importance is the fact that this Court concludedthat<br />

the distinction between G.L.c. 276, $ 87 and G.L.c.<br />

276, 3 58, had "no bearing on our resolution of this<br />

I1<br />

cnse. Emelio, supra at n. 3.<br />

Therefore, based on Raposo and Emelio, supra,<br />

as a matter of judicial precendence (stare decisis),<br />

the issue is now well settled thatapretrialdefendant<br />

cannot be required to wear a global positioning system<br />

(GPS) device (pursuant to G.L.c. 265, 471, whether<br />

he is released from custody on pretrial probation<br />

pursuant to G.L.G. 276, 5 87 (Raposo, supra a t 740),<br />

or bail pursuant to G.L.c. 276, 5 58 (Emelio, supra<br />

at n. 3). Moreover, as a matter of statutory inter-<br />

pretation, this Court concluded from the language<br />

and history of G.L.c. 265, s 47, "that the <strong>Mass</strong>-<br />

achusetts legislature intends a global positioning<br />

system requirement to apply only to convicted<br />

individuals." Raposo, supra at 748.<br />

Though both Raposo and Emelio were charged with<br />

sex offenses, as defined by G.L.c. 6, § 178C);<br />

however, Emelio was awaiting trial and had "not

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!