NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases
NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases
NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
placed on probation prior to trial and prior to<br />
conviction or entry of a plea of guilty or admission<br />
to facts sufficient for a finding of guilty." Emphasis<br />
added. Emelio, supra at 1024. Also of significant<br />
importance is the fact that this Court concludedthat<br />
the distinction between G.L.c. 276, $ 87 and G.L.c.<br />
276, 3 58, had "no bearing on our resolution of this<br />
I1<br />
cnse. Emelio, supra at n. 3.<br />
Therefore, based on Raposo and Emelio, supra,<br />
as a matter of judicial precendence (stare decisis),<br />
the issue is now well settled thatapretrialdefendant<br />
cannot be required to wear a global positioning system<br />
(GPS) device (pursuant to G.L.c. 265, 471, whether<br />
he is released from custody on pretrial probation<br />
pursuant to G.L.G. 276, 5 87 (Raposo, supra a t 740),<br />
or bail pursuant to G.L.c. 276, 5 58 (Emelio, supra<br />
at n. 3). Moreover, as a matter of statutory inter-<br />
pretation, this Court concluded from the language<br />
and history of G.L.c. 265, s 47, "that the <strong>Mass</strong>-<br />
achusetts legislature intends a global positioning<br />
system requirement to apply only to convicted<br />
individuals." Raposo, supra at 748.<br />
Though both Raposo and Emelio were charged with<br />
sex offenses, as defined by G.L.c. 6, § 178C);<br />
however, Emelio was awaiting trial and had "not