20.07.2013 Views

NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases

NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases

NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

As a result of three months of constant GPS<br />

monitoring, tracking, and surveillance, which<br />

culminated in a threatening phone call from a<br />

police officer the day before trial, the Pro Se<br />

defendant has reason to be fearful and leery,<br />

The PKO se defendant changed his defense, and<br />

decided to not testify on his own behalf at trial.<br />

After closing arguments and jruy instructions,<br />

as the jury was leaving the courtroom for delibera-<br />

tion, the trial judge instructed the defendant to<br />

remain in the courtraom (the Pro Se defendant was<br />

preparing to leave the courtroom to call the<br />

missing witnesses). The trial judge (Muse, J.),<br />

then ordered that court officers to take the<br />

Pro Se defendant into custody. When the defendant<br />

asked the trial judge what was going on, the trial<br />

judge stated that he was revoking the dgfendant's<br />

bail. The defendant argued that he had not violated<br />

the conditions of his bail or the GPS consitions,<br />

and that the Commonwealth did not request that the<br />

defendant's bail be revoked. The trial judge stated<br />

that he was revoking the defendant's bail, "sua<br />

sponte. 1,<br />

Though the trial was still in progress, the Pro<br />

Se defmdant was taken into custody and placed in<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!