NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases
NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases
NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
As a result of three months of constant GPS<br />
monitoring, tracking, and surveillance, which<br />
culminated in a threatening phone call from a<br />
police officer the day before trial, the Pro Se<br />
defendant has reason to be fearful and leery,<br />
The PKO se defendant changed his defense, and<br />
decided to not testify on his own behalf at trial.<br />
After closing arguments and jruy instructions,<br />
as the jury was leaving the courtroom for delibera-<br />
tion, the trial judge instructed the defendant to<br />
remain in the courtraom (the Pro Se defendant was<br />
preparing to leave the courtroom to call the<br />
missing witnesses). The trial judge (Muse, J.),<br />
then ordered that court officers to take the<br />
Pro Se defendant into custody. When the defendant<br />
asked the trial judge what was going on, the trial<br />
judge stated that he was revoking the dgfendant's<br />
bail. The defendant argued that he had not violated<br />
the conditions of his bail or the GPS consitions,<br />
and that the Commonwealth did not request that the<br />
defendant's bail be revoked. The trial judge stated<br />
that he was revoking the defendant's bail, "sua<br />
sponte. 1,<br />
Though the trial was still in progress, the Pro<br />
Se defmdant was taken into custody and placed in<br />
19