20.07.2013 Views

NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases

NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases

NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The defendant then informed Ms. Marie Williams<br />

(owner of the cellular phone) about the telephone<br />

threats from a police officer, and Ms. Williams<br />

stated that she would get a copy of the METRO PCS<br />

cellular phone records as soon as possible. (R.A.<br />

"54-55").<br />

The defendant also contacted his legal assist-<br />

ant, Ms. Joe Younge, and informed her about the<br />

threatening phone call from a police officer, and<br />

Ms. Younge also advised the defendant to get a copy<br />

of the METRO PCS cellular phone records as proof<br />

before bringing the matter to the attention of the<br />

court (R.A. "56-57").<br />

The defendant had been leery about aggressively<br />

pursuing defense leads and questioning potential<br />

witnesses because of the GPS monitoring, tracking,<br />

and surveillance, and his reluctance was proven<br />

to have some merit as a result of the timing of<br />

the threatening phone call from a police officer<br />

shortly after leaving attorney Relanger's office,<br />

and a day before the start of trial. All of which<br />

was aimed at interfering and inlfuencing trial<br />

proceedings. While at the same time, the defen-<br />

dant had to endure constant harassment, ridicule,<br />

and ostracization by being mislablled as a sex<br />

offender wearing a GPS electronic bracelet.<br />

18<br />

.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!