NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases
NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases
NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
several grounds, including the issue that he was<br />
being placed at a substantial disadvanatge by not<br />
being afforded the opportunity to interview the<br />
Commonwealth’s witnesses, especially where the<br />
Commonwealth filed an extensive witness list on<br />
the previous day (12/07/09). The trial judge (Muse,<br />
J.) again noted defendant’s objection, and denied<br />
the motion (R.A. “51”). After jury selection and<br />
enpanellrnent, the session was adjourned, and trial<br />
was to begin the next day.<br />
On December 8, 2009, later that afternoon,<br />
the defendant went to the office of attorney Lisa<br />
S. Belanger, i n Medford to discuss trial strategies<br />
and defenses. Attorney Belanger called the GPS<br />
monitoring center and requested additional time<br />
for the defendant to prepare for trial at her<br />
office; however, that request was denied. The<br />
defendant was instructed to step outside so that<br />
the GPS monitoring center could re-adjust their<br />
GPS tracking monitor.<br />
Shortly after the defendant left attorney<br />
Belanger’s office, the GPS tracking system<br />
recognized that the defendant was no longer at<br />
attorney Belanger’s office. While at Men’s Wear-<br />
house, the defendant received a phone call on his<br />
cellular phone from a Cambridge Police Officer,<br />
16