20.07.2013 Views

NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases

NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases

NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

several grounds, including the issue that he was<br />

being placed at a substantial disadvanatge by not<br />

being afforded the opportunity to interview the<br />

Commonwealth’s witnesses, especially where the<br />

Commonwealth filed an extensive witness list on<br />

the previous day (12/07/09). The trial judge (Muse,<br />

J.) again noted defendant’s objection, and denied<br />

the motion (R.A. “51”). After jury selection and<br />

enpanellrnent, the session was adjourned, and trial<br />

was to begin the next day.<br />

On December 8, 2009, later that afternoon,<br />

the defendant went to the office of attorney Lisa<br />

S. Belanger, i n Medford to discuss trial strategies<br />

and defenses. Attorney Belanger called the GPS<br />

monitoring center and requested additional time<br />

for the defendant to prepare for trial at her<br />

office; however, that request was denied. The<br />

defendant was instructed to step outside so that<br />

the GPS monitoring center could re-adjust their<br />

GPS tracking monitor.<br />

Shortly after the defendant left attorney<br />

Belanger’s office, the GPS tracking system<br />

recognized that the defendant was no longer at<br />

attorney Belanger’s office. While at Men’s Wear-<br />

house, the defendant received a phone call on his<br />

cellular phone from a Cambridge Police Officer,<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!