20.07.2013 Views

NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases

NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases

NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Pro Se defendant sent an email to the<br />

Commissioner of Probation complaining that the<br />

probation department did not have the authority<br />

to maintain probation supervision over the defendant<br />

through the use of GPS monitoring because the<br />

defendant was I_<br />

not a convicted sex offender. The<br />

defendant received a telephone call from someone<br />

from the Commissioner of Probation's office who<br />

advised the defendant that the probation dept.<br />

had hundreds of people on the GPS electronic<br />

bracelet, and that the defendant would have to<br />

petition the court to be taken off of the GPS<br />

electronic bracelet, otherwise a warrant would<br />

be issued for his arrest if he removed the GPS<br />

electronic bracelet on his own or failed to<br />

comply with the corresponding conditions.<br />

When the Pro Se defendant attempted to<br />

interview the Commonwealth's witnesses, he was<br />

met with fierce resistance from the prosecuting<br />

attorney, who continuously refused to comply with<br />

mandatory discovery and would not provide the Pro<br />

Se defendant with the names and address of the<br />

Commonwealth's witnesses. Standby counsel (Bruce<br />

Ferg) advised the Pro Se defendant not to attempt<br />

to contact any of the Commonwealth's witnesses<br />

. .<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!