NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases
NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases
NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The Pro Se defendant sent an email to the<br />
Commissioner of Probation complaining that the<br />
probation department did not have the authority<br />
to maintain probation supervision over the defendant<br />
through the use of GPS monitoring because the<br />
defendant was I_<br />
not a convicted sex offender. The<br />
defendant received a telephone call from someone<br />
from the Commissioner of Probation's office who<br />
advised the defendant that the probation dept.<br />
had hundreds of people on the GPS electronic<br />
bracelet, and that the defendant would have to<br />
petition the court to be taken off of the GPS<br />
electronic bracelet, otherwise a warrant would<br />
be issued for his arrest if he removed the GPS<br />
electronic bracelet on his own or failed to<br />
comply with the corresponding conditions.<br />
When the Pro Se defendant attempted to<br />
interview the Commonwealth's witnesses, he was<br />
met with fierce resistance from the prosecuting<br />
attorney, who continuously refused to comply with<br />
mandatory discovery and would not provide the Pro<br />
Se defendant with the names and address of the<br />
Commonwealth's witnesses. Standby counsel (Bruce<br />
Ferg) advised the Pro Se defendant not to attempt<br />
to contact any of the Commonwealth's witnesses<br />
. .<br />
12