NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases
NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases
NO. SJC-10824 PURSUANT TO GLC 211, 5 3 FROM ... - Mass Cases
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
that he was - not a convicted sex offender, and<br />
that he was on bail for property related crimes.<br />
The defendant also argued that the government<br />
had an uLterior motive €or placing the Pro Se<br />
defendant an the GPS tracking device so as to<br />
monitor and conduct 24 hour surveillance on<br />
the defendant‘s movements as he prepared his<br />
case for trial. The hearing judge (Muse, J.),<br />
threatened to revoke defendant’s bail and have<br />
him placed back in custody i f the defendant<br />
persisted with his challenge to the conditions<br />
of bail that he wear a GPS bracelet, The motion<br />
was then denied (R.A. “13” , no. 168).<br />
The Pro Se defendant then complained to<br />
the Middlesex Superior Court Chief Frobation<br />
Officer (Joyce Coleman), that the Probation<br />
Department did not have the legal authority to<br />
maintain supervision over the defendant through<br />
the use of GFS monitoring because the defendant<br />
-<br />
was not a sex offender. The Chief Probation<br />
Officer agreed that there was a conflict, but<br />
that there was nothing she could do except to<br />
notify the Commissioner of Probation about the<br />
problem.<br />
11