464 Mass. 566 - Appellant Montoya Brief - Mass Cases

464 Mass. 566 - Appellant Montoya Brief - Mass Cases 464 Mass. 566 - Appellant Montoya Brief - Mass Cases

masscases.com
from masscases.com More from this publisher
20.07.2013 Views

In applying less strict test of the creation a substantial sk of" miscarriage of justice, the st is whether erroneous adrniss of the label on the bag materially influenced verdict insofar as it hinged upon determination of the weight of alleged cont "The subst ial risk of a scarriage of justice standard has points of cornmonality with t more particulariz appellate standard of review governinq the legal fications a violation of constitutional confrontat rights . commonality between the standards involves late court's obI ion to assess materiality of e testimony that, in error, was not subject to confrontation by cross-examination, and to weigh the , effect of this erroneously admitted unconfronted imony against the st of the Cornmonwe th' s proof, notwithstanding the confrontation-related error." Commonwealth v. Brazie, 66 Mass. App. . 315, 319 (2006). defendant respect ly submits that ew of fact that the jury clearly had great difficulty wi the question of the weight of the alleged cant and, one cannot s with fair assurance 49 . ...f"

In applying less strict test of the creation<br />

a substantial sk of" miscarriage of justice, the<br />

st is whether erroneous adrniss of the label<br />

on the bag materially influenced verdict insofar<br />

as it hinged upon determination of the weight of<br />

alleged cont "The subst ial risk of a<br />

scarriage of justice standard has points of<br />

cornmonality with t more particulariz appellate<br />

standard of review governinq the legal fications<br />

a violation of constitutional confrontat rights .<br />

commonality between the standards involves<br />

late court's obI ion to assess materiality<br />

of e testimony that, in error, was not subject to<br />

confrontation by cross-examination, and to weigh the<br />

,<br />

effect of this erroneously admitted unconfronted<br />

imony against the st of the Cornmonwe th' s<br />

proof, notwithstanding the confrontation-related<br />

error." Commonwealth v. Brazie, 66 <strong>Mass</strong>. App. . 315,<br />

319 (2006).<br />

defendant respect ly submits that ew<br />

of fact that the jury clearly had great difficulty<br />

wi the question of the weight of the alleged<br />

cant and, one cannot s with fair assurance<br />

49<br />

. ...f"

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!