464 Mass. 566 - Appellant Montoya Brief - Mass Cases
464 Mass. 566 - Appellant Montoya Brief - Mass Cases 464 Mass. 566 - Appellant Montoya Brief - Mass Cases
In applying less strict test of the creation a substantial sk of" miscarriage of justice, the st is whether erroneous adrniss of the label on the bag materially influenced verdict insofar as it hinged upon determination of the weight of alleged cont "The subst ial risk of a scarriage of justice standard has points of cornmonality with t more particulariz appellate standard of review governinq the legal fications a violation of constitutional confrontat rights . commonality between the standards involves late court's obI ion to assess materiality of e testimony that, in error, was not subject to confrontation by cross-examination, and to weigh the , effect of this erroneously admitted unconfronted imony against the st of the Cornmonwe th' s proof, notwithstanding the confrontation-related error." Commonwealth v. Brazie, 66 Mass. App. . 315, 319 (2006). defendant respect ly submits that ew of fact that the jury clearly had great difficulty wi the question of the weight of the alleged cant and, one cannot s with fair assurance 49 . ...f"
- Page 6: Commonwealth v. Levy, 459 Mass. 101
- Page 11 and 12: into the jury room but on this bag
- Page 16 and 17: April 6, 2011, the defendant filed
- Page 19: anot r radio transmission from Troo
- Page 25: Corcoran was prob ly originally an
- Page 31 and 32: indicates t t person would not be f
- Page 34 and 35: the motion to suppress that Corcora
- Page 37: variable that differentiates the in
- Page 41 and 42: A. The Evidence Concerning The Weig
- Page 47: harmless beyond a reasonable doubt
- Page 52: focused on cribing street level dru
- Page 55: prejudi al but also inadmiss e hear
In applying less strict test of the creation<br />
a substantial sk of" miscarriage of justice, the<br />
st is whether erroneous adrniss of the label<br />
on the bag materially influenced verdict insofar<br />
as it hinged upon determination of the weight of<br />
alleged cont "The subst ial risk of a<br />
scarriage of justice standard has points of<br />
cornmonality with t more particulariz appellate<br />
standard of review governinq the legal fications<br />
a violation of constitutional confrontat rights .<br />
commonality between the standards involves<br />
late court's obI ion to assess materiality<br />
of e testimony that, in error, was not subject to<br />
confrontation by cross-examination, and to weigh the<br />
,<br />
effect of this erroneously admitted unconfronted<br />
imony against the st of the Cornmonwe th' s<br />
proof, notwithstanding the confrontation-related<br />
error." Commonwealth v. Brazie, 66 <strong>Mass</strong>. App. . 315,<br />
319 (2006).<br />
defendant respect ly submits that ew<br />
of fact that the jury clearly had great difficulty<br />
wi the question of the weight of the alleged<br />
cant and, one cannot s with fair assurance<br />
49<br />
. ...f"