20.07.2013 Views

464 Mass. 566 - Appellant Montoya Brief - Mass Cases

464 Mass. 566 - Appellant Montoya Brief - Mass Cases

464 Mass. 566 - Appellant Montoya Brief - Mass Cases

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In his motion for a new t , the de also<br />

raised the issue of ineffect assistance of counsel.<br />

RA 59-60. As can be seen from affidavit sent<br />

'defense counsel submitted wi this motion, trial<br />

defense couns refused to provide any informat of<br />

his trial strategy in not obj ing to the admission<br />

of the drug ficates. RA 60-62.<br />

In view of the decision of the SJC in Vasquez<br />

decision rende after the ndant's motion r a<br />

new trial was led and the that the is<br />

entitled to harmless error analysis in this appeaT<br />

with respect to the drug analysis certificates, the<br />

issue of inef ive assistance of counsel in ling<br />

to object to r admission at trial is moot.<br />

However, re was one tant in the t where<br />

the conduct defense counsel was clearly cient<br />

and which is still before this Court. As scussed<br />

above at pp. 37-38 supra, there was no excuse for<br />

trial defense counsel in not obj ecting to t jury<br />

considering strip with t figure of 43.5 ams<br />

written on it and which strip was on t bag<br />

containing individual pa s of alleged cocaine<br />

in Exhib 5. This evidence was not only highly<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!