20.07.2013 Views

464 Mass. 566 - Appellant Montoya Brief - Mass Cases

464 Mass. 566 - Appellant Montoya Brief - Mass Cases

464 Mass. 566 - Appellant Montoya Brief - Mass Cases

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

However, this radio transmission had occurred after<br />

Trooper Saunders had already st d the defendant.<br />

MTS1/45-49. Moreover, Trooper Sau rs did not<br />

testi that he ard Trooper Porter say that the<br />

defendant had just sold some coca to the occupant<br />

the white pick-up. In s findings of fact, the<br />

motion judge found only that Trooper Saunders had<br />

received first radio transmission. He made no<br />

finding concerning the second radio transmission. RA<br />

Accordingly, the sum total of the combi<br />

observations of both of these lice officers up to<br />

the moment t the de ndant was st d, consisted<br />

of the drivers of the brown Toyota and the pick-up<br />

truck conversing with one another in a parking lot,<br />

driver of the brown Toyota handing some unknown<br />

obje to the dr of the ck-up truck, the brown<br />

Toyota departing the scene and t the driver of the<br />

6At the motion hearing, the judge found the testimony<br />

of Trooper Saunders at first to be vague and confusing<br />

as to when he rece d the two radio tran ssions<br />

from Trooper Porter. However, the judge intervened and<br />

was careful to pin down Trooper Saunders as to when he<br />

received the rst radio transmission from Trooper<br />

Porter and when received second. The second<br />

radio transmission from Trooper Porter was received<br />

after he already stopped the fendant. MTS1/48­<br />

49.<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!