20.07.2013 Views

464 Mass. 566 - Appellant Montoya Brief - Mass Cases

464 Mass. 566 - Appellant Montoya Brief - Mass Cases

464 Mass. 566 - Appellant Montoya Brief - Mass Cases

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

indicates t t person would not be free to leave<br />

without re to officer's inquiry is fun 1<br />

to seizure). The second and most crucial s on<br />

then is whether Trooper Saunders had probable cause to<br />

arrest the fendant at the moment that he ef<br />

the stop. Unfortunately, this issue is muddied by the<br />

somewhat ue testimony of Troopers Porter<br />

Saunders respectively concerning the radio<br />

transmissions that Trooper Saunders received<br />

Trooper Porter while he was following the de<br />

and which accounts do not ent ly mesh.<br />

Trooper Porter testified to sending just one<br />

radio transmission at this t , i. e. that the<br />

of the brown Toyota had just sold cocaine to<br />

driver of white pick-up. Trooper Saunders on<br />

other hand stified that the rst radio transmission<br />

that he re ved from Trooper Porter indicated<br />

Trooper Porter had found "product" but wit t<br />

providing details. MTSI 45-48. Trooper S rs<br />

testified that the second transmission that he<br />

received from Trooper Porter indicated that he<br />

(Trooper Porter) had observed the occupant of<br />

white pick-up truck as smoking something. MTSl 45-48.<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!