SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT DIRK GKEINEDER - Mass Cases
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT DIRK GKEINEDER - Mass Cases SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT DIRK GKEINEDER - Mass Cases
Bradv v. Marvland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) . . . California v. Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970) < . Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925) . . TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Federal Cases 27, 28, 33, 33n. . . . . . . . 29 . . . . . . . 61 Chavman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 (1967) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 Coosan v. McCaushtrv, 958 F.2d 793 (7‘” Cir. 1991) Crawford v. washinston, 541 U.S. 36 (2004) . . . . . . . . . 29 . . . . . 11 Daubert v. Mesrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 DowLins v. United States, 493 U.S. 342 (1990) . . . Doyle v, Ohio, 426 U.S. 610 (1976) . . . Kimmelman v. orriso on, 477 U.S. 365 (1986) . . . KylPs v. Whitlev, 419 U.S. 419 (1995) . . . Larrison v. united States, 24 P.2d 82 (7th Cir. 1928) . . . . 21 . . . . 16 . . . 46 . . . 28 27, 21n., 32, 33 Mauu v. Ohio, 367 W.S. 643 (1961) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 Martin v. United States, 17 F.2d 973 (5th Cir. 1327) . . . Massachusetts v. Shermard, 468 U .S. 981 (1984) . . . . . . . vii 26, 21 . . 58
Miller v. Harvey, 566 F.2d 879 (4th Cir. 1977) . . . . . . . . . . 37n. Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1 (1999) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Owens v. United Stateu, 483 F.38 48 (lat Cir. 2007), on remand, 517 F.Supp. 2d 570 (D.Mass. 2007) . . . . 4, 5, 6, 6n. Parker v. Gladden, 385 U.S. 363 (1966) (per curiam) . . . . . . . . . 42 Press-Enterprise Co. v. Supprior Court of Cal., 464 U.S. 501 (1984) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Strickland v. Washinston, 466 W.S. 668 (1384) . . . . . . . . 45, 46 United States v. Aqurs, 427 U.S. 97 (1976) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 United States v. Antar, 38 F.3d 1348 (3d Cir. 1994) . . . . . 5 United States v. Baalev, 473 U.S. 667 (1985) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 United States v. Ferreras, 192 F.3d 5 (Ist Cir. 1999) . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 United Statea v. Lofton, 233 F.3d 313 (4kt‘ Cir. 2000) . . . . . United States v. Mevers, 484 F.2d 113 (3rd Cir. 1973) . , 2711. .... 27n. United States v. Nevell, 28 F.3d 109 (gth Cir. 1994) . . . . . . . . . . 3711. United States v. Sampson, 335 F.Supp.2d 166 (D.Mass. 2004) . . 65 United States v. Welch, 377 F.Supp. 367 (D.S.C. 1971) x3.c. 496 F.2d 861 (qL” Cir. 1973) . . . . 37n. a. United States v. Willis, 257 F.3d 636 (6t” Cir. 2001) . . . . 27 viii
- Page 1 and 2: NORFOLK. ss. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSAC
- Page 3 and 4: 3. Greineder's direct testimony. .
- Page 5 and 6: VI. VII. d. Greineder is entitled t
- Page 7: 4 . Counsel's failure to move to su
- Page 11 and 12: Commonwealth v. Carter, 39 Mass. Ap
- Page 13 and 14: Commonwealth v. Martinez, 425 Mass.
- Page 15 and 16: FitzDatrick v. Allen, 410 Mass. 791
- Page 17 and 18: STATEMENT OF THE CASE Dirk K. Grein
- Page 19 and 20: First of all, we are in Room 8. The
- Page 21 and 22: logistical reasons for closure.3 As
- Page 23 and 24: inculpatory DNA test results linkin
- Page 25 and 26: testified that Greineder could not
- Page 27 and 28: This Court held in Bmmonwealth v. N
- Page 29 and 30: of his Miranda rights. a. at 112-12
- Page 31 and 32: up Ms. Greineder . Greineder replie
- Page 33 and 34: waives that right and makes volunta
- Page 35 and 36: that Greineder had never mentioned
- Page 37 and 38: they render the trial fundamentally
- Page 39 and 40: Prior to trial, the Commonwealth ma
- Page 41 and 42: gets to that point [i.e., to commit
- Page 43 and 44: States, 17 F.2d 973, 976 (5th Cir.
- Page 45 and 46: 399 Mass. 17, 21 n.5 (1987). In Gal
- Page 47 and 48: 1. Rebeiro's trial testimony was fa
- Page 49 and 50: As noted above, many jurisdictions
- Page 51 and 52: deliberations. Judge Chernoff is co
- Page 53 and 54: where the jury had experimented wit
- Page 55 and 56: jury, if “a judge learns that a j
- Page 57 and 58: consideration of the factors outlin
Bradv v. Marvland,<br />
373 U.S. 83 (1963) . . .<br />
California v. Green,<br />
399 U.S. 149 (1970) < .<br />
Carroll v. United States,<br />
267 U.S. 132 (1925) . .<br />
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES<br />
Federal <strong>Cases</strong><br />
27, 28, 33, 33n.<br />
. . . . . . . 29<br />
. . . . . . . 61<br />
Chavman v. California,<br />
386 U.S. 18 (1967) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38<br />
Coosan v. McCaushtrv,<br />
958 F.2d 793 (7‘” Cir. 1991)<br />
Crawford v. washinston,<br />
541 U.S. 36 (2004) . . . .<br />
. . . . . 29<br />
. . . . . 11<br />
Daubert v. Mesrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,<br />
509 U.S. 579 (1993) . . . . . . . . . . . . 44<br />
DowLins v. United States,<br />
493 U.S. 342 (1990) . . .<br />
Doyle v, Ohio,<br />
426 U.S. 610 (1976) . . .<br />
Kimmelman v. orriso on,<br />
477 U.S. 365 (1986) . . .<br />
KylPs v. Whitlev,<br />
419 U.S. 419 (1995) . . .<br />
Larrison v. united States,<br />
24 P.2d 82 (7th Cir. 1928)<br />
. . . . 21<br />
. . . . 16<br />
. . . 46<br />
. . . 28<br />
27, 21n., 32, 33<br />
Mauu v. Ohio,<br />
367 W.S. 643 (1961) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59<br />
Martin v. United States,<br />
17 F.2d 973 (5th Cir. 1327) . . .<br />
<strong>Mass</strong>achusetts v. Shermard,<br />
468 U .S. 981 (1984) . . . . . . .<br />
vii<br />
26, 21<br />
. . 58